Driving neural oscillations with correlated spatial input and topographic feedback.

We consider how oscillatory activity in networks of excitable systems depends on spatial correlations of random inputs and the spatial range of feedback coupling. Analysis of a neural field model with topographic delayed recurrent feedback reveals how oscillations in certain frequency bands, including the gamma band, are enhanced by increases in the input correlation length. Further, the enhancement is maximal when this length exceeds the feedback coupling range. Suppression of oscillatory power occurs concomitantly in other bands. These effects depend solely on the ratio of input and feedback length scales. The precise positions of these bands are determined by the synaptic constants and the delays. The results agree with numerical simulations of the model and of a network of stochastic spiking neurons, and are expected for any noise-driven excitable element networks.

[1]  Stephen Coombes,et al.  Waves, bumps, and patterns in neural field theories , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  D. Hansel,et al.  Role of delays in shaping spatiotemporal dynamics of neuronal activity in large networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[3]  B. Ermentrout,et al.  Chemical and electrical synapses perform complementary roles in the synchronization of interneuronal networks. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  Hansel,et al.  Synchronization and computation in a chaotic neural network. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[5]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Theory of oscillatory firing induced by spatially correlated noise and delayed inhibitory feedback. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  L. Maler,et al.  Neural architecture of the electrosensory lateral line lobe: adaptations for coincidence detection, a sensory searchlight and frequency-dependent adaptive filtering , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[7]  Hilbert J. Kappen,et al.  Input-Driven Oscillations in Networks with Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons with Dynamic Synapses , 2007, Neural Computation.

[8]  Christoph Kayser,et al.  Stimulus locking and feature selectivity prevail in complementary frequency ranges of V1 local field potentials , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  J. Fermaglich Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG , 1982 .

[10]  Walter J. Freeman,et al.  Neurodynamics: An Exploration in Mesoscopic Brain Dynamics , 2000, Perspectives in Neural Computing.

[11]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks , 2004, Science.

[12]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Circuits for Local and Global Signal Integration in Primary Visual Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Inhibitory feedback required for network oscillatory responses to communication but not prey stimuli , 2003, Nature.

[14]  T. D. Frank,et al.  Critical Fluctuations and 1/fα-Activity of Neural Fields Involving Transmission Delays , 2005 .

[15]  Brent Doiron,et al.  Oscillatory activity in electrosensory neurons increases with the spatial correlation of the stochastic input stimulus. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[16]  Milos Dolnik,et al.  Oscillatory cluster patterns in a homogeneous chemical system with global feedback , 2000, Nature.

[17]  J. M. Sancho,et al.  Noise in spatially extended systems , 1999 .

[18]  J. Bechhoefer Feedback for physicists: A tutorial essay on control , 2005 .

[19]  宁北芳,et al.  疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]/Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A , 2005 .

[20]  W. Singer,et al.  Stimulus‐Dependent Neuronal Oscillations in Cat Visual Cortex: Receptive Field Properties and Feature Dependence , 1990, The European journal of neuroscience.

[21]  Thomas Wennekers,et al.  Pattern formation in intracortical neuronal fields , 2003, Network.

[22]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Filtering of Spatial Bias and Noise Inputs by Spatially Structured Neural Networks , 2007, Neural Computation.

[23]  E. Fortune,et al.  Global electrosensory oscillations enhance directional responses of midbrain neurons in eigenmannia. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  A. Angelucci,et al.  Contribution of feedforward, lateral and feedback connections to the classical receptive field center and extra-classical receptive field surround of primate V1 neurons. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[25]  M. Mattia,et al.  Population dynamics of interacting spiking neurons. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[26]  Bijan Pesaran,et al.  Temporal structure in neuronal activity during working memory in macaque parietal cortex , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  P. Bressloff,et al.  PHYSICS OF THE EXTENDED NEURON , 1997 .

[28]  André Longtin,et al.  Delayed excitatory and inhibitory feedback shape neural information transmission. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[30]  S. Hamann Blue genes: wiring the brain for depression , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  H. B. Barlow The neurologic of matching filters , 1999 .

[32]  K. Obermayer,et al.  The Role of Feedback in Shaping the Extra-Classical Receptive Field of Cortical Neurons: A Recurrent Network Model , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  Kazuyuki Aihara,et al.  Coding of Temporally Varying Signals in Networks of Spiking Neurons with Global Delayed Feedback , 2005, Neural Computation.

[34]  J. Bullier,et al.  The role of feedback connections in shaping the responses of visual cortical neurons. , 2001, Progress in brain research.

[35]  David Kleinfeld,et al.  Active sensation: insights from the rodent vibrissa sensorimotor system , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[36]  J K Chapin,et al.  A major direct GABAergic pathway from zona incerta to neocortex. , 1990, Science.