Evolutionary truss layout optimization using the vectorized structure approach

A new method called vectorized structure approach (VSA) is proposed for truss layout optimization, which allows effective changes to the truss structure by iteratively adding or removing nodes. This approach generalizes topology optimization to shape optimization, which is based on geometric construction rules. The VSA can generate structures containing a basic set of the required nodes and other nodes that may be critical for finding the optimal structure. The Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) is employed for VSA-based truss optimization. Numerical results show that the VSA-based CMA-ES is successful in finding optimal truss layouts and some of the found solutions are better than the best known topologies reported thus far in the literature.

[1]  P. Hajela,et al.  Genetic algorithms in truss topological optimization , 1995 .

[2]  A. Michell LVIII. The limits of economy of material in frame-structures , 1904 .

[3]  G. I. N. Rozvany,et al.  Difficulties in truss topology optimization with stress, local buckling and system stability constraints , 1996 .

[4]  Ali Kaveh,et al.  Truss optimization with natural frequency constraints using a hybridized CSS-BBBC algorithm with trap recognition capability , 2012 .

[5]  Harvey J. Greenberg,et al.  Automatic design of optimal structures , 1964 .

[6]  Nikolaus Hansen,et al.  Evaluating the CMA Evolution Strategy on Multimodal Test Functions , 2004, PPSN.

[7]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Topology Optimization: "Theory, Methods, And Applications" , 2011 .

[8]  Ali Kaveh,et al.  A hybrid evolutionary graph-based multi-objective algorithm for layout optimization of truss structures , 2013 .

[9]  Frank Ching,et al.  A Visual Dictionary of Architecture , 1995 .

[10]  Herbert Martins Gomes,et al.  Truss optimization with dynamic constraints using a particle swarm algorithm , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[11]  D. Wang,et al.  Truss Optimization on Shape and Sizing with Frequency Constraints , 2004 .

[12]  Meng Guang,et al.  Truss optimization on shape and sizing with frequency constraints based on genetic algorithm , 2005 .

[13]  S. Rajeev,et al.  Discrete Optimization of Structures Using Genetic Algorithms , 1992 .

[14]  P. Fourie,et al.  The particle swarm optimization algorithm in size and shape optimization , 2002 .

[15]  P. B. Thanedar,et al.  Computational methods for optimum design of large complex systems , 1986 .

[16]  G. Cheng,et al.  ε-relaxed approach in structural topology optimization , 1997 .

[17]  J. Ho Optimal design of multi-stage structures: a nested decomposition approach , 1975 .

[18]  L. Gil,et al.  Shape and cross-section optimisation of a truss structure , 2001 .

[19]  Ali Kaveh,et al.  SHAPE AND SIZE OPTIMIZATION OF TRUSS STRUCTURES WITH FREQUENCY CONSTRAINTS USING ENHANCED CHARGED SYSTEM SEARCH ALGORITHM , 2011 .

[20]  Anne Auger,et al.  Real-Parameter Black-Box Optimization Benchmarking 2009: Noiseless Functions Definitions , 2009 .

[21]  B. H. V. Topping,et al.  Shape Optimization of Skeletal Structures: A Review , 1983 .

[22]  Alan Shu Khen Kwan,et al.  An evolutionary approach for layout optimization of a three-dimensional truss , 2002 .

[23]  Bernhard Sendhoff,et al.  A systems approach to evolutionary multiobjective structural optimization and beyond , 2009, IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

[24]  M. Krejsa,et al.  Structural Mechanics , 2001 .

[25]  Fan Zijie,et al.  Truss Topology Optimization Using Genetic Algorithm with Individual Identification Technique , 2009 .

[26]  M. Stolpe,et al.  Truss topology optimization with discrete design variables—Guaranteed global optimality and benchmark examples , 2007 .

[27]  Nikolaus Hansen,et al.  Completely Derandomized Self-Adaptation in Evolution Strategies , 2001, Evolutionary Computation.

[28]  Mary Frecker,et al.  Hinged Beam Elements for the Topology Design of Compliant Mechanisms Using the Ground Structure Approach , 2006 .

[29]  I. A. Azid,et al.  A GA‐based technique for layout optimization of truss with stress and displacement constraints , 2002 .

[30]  Leandro Fleck Fadel Miguel,et al.  Shape and size optimization of truss structures considering dynamic constraints through modern metaheuristic algorithms , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[31]  Ke Tang,et al.  A Study on Scalable Representations for Evolutionary Optimization of Ground Structures , 2012, Evolutionary Computation.

[32]  N. Katoh,et al.  Topology optimization of trusses with stress and local constraints on nodal stability and member intersection , 2005 .

[33]  Subramaniam Rajan,et al.  Sizing, Shape, and Topology Design Optimization of Trusses Using Genetic Algorithm , 1995 .

[34]  Prabhat Hajela,et al.  Topological optimization of rotorcraft subfloor structures for crashworthiness considerations , 1997 .

[35]  Bernhard Sendhoff,et al.  A framework for evolutionary optimization with approximate fitness functions , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[36]  C. Fleury,et al.  Dual methods and approximation concepts in structural synthesis , 1980 .