Graded size sensitivity of object-exemplar-evoked activity patterns within human LOC subregions.

A central issue for understanding visual object recognition is how the cortical hierarchy represents incoming sensory information and transforms it across successive processing stages. The format of object representation in the human brain has thus far mostly been studied using adaptation paradigms because the neuronal layout of object selectivities was thought to be beyond the resolution of conventional functional MRI (fMRI). Recently, however, multivariate pattern recognition succeeded in discriminating fMRI responses of object-selective cortex to different object exemplars within a given category. Here, we use increased spatial fMRI resolution to explore size sensitivity and tolerance to size change of response patterns evoked by object exemplars across a range of three sizes. Results from Support Vector Classification on responses of the human lateral occipital complex (LOC) show that discrimination of size (for a given object) and discrimination of objects across changes in size depended on the amount of size difference. Even across the largest amount of size change, accuracy for generalization was still significant in LOC, whereas the same comparison was at chance performance in early visual (calcarine) cortex. Analyzing subregions, we further found an anterior-posterior gradient in the degree of size sensitivity and size generalization within the posterior-dorsal and anterior-ventral parts of LOC. These results speak against fully size-invariant representation of object information in human LOC and are hence congruent with findings in monkeys showing object identity and size information in population activity of inferotemporal cortex. Moreover, these results provide evidence for a fine-grained functional heterogeneity within human LOC beyond the commonly used LO/fusiform subdivision.

[1]  Minami Ito,et al.  Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 1992, Nature.

[2]  R. Desimone,et al.  Inferior temporal mechanisms for invariant object recognition. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Minami Ito,et al.  Size and position invariance of neuronal responses in monkey inferotemporal cortex. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.

[5]  A. Dale,et al.  New images from human visual cortex , 1996, Trends in Neurosciences.

[6]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[7]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[8]  Vladimir N. Vapnik,et al.  The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory , 2000, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[9]  R. Vogels,et al.  Spatial sensitivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[10]  T. Poggio,et al.  Neural mechanisms of object recognition , 2002, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[11]  R. Malach,et al.  The topography of high-order human object areas , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  R. Savoy Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) , 2002 .

[13]  R. Henson,et al.  Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  David D. Cox,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) “brain reading”: detecting and classifying distributed patterns of fMRI activity in human visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[15]  K. Grill-Spector The neural basis of object perception , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[16]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  The human visual cortex. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  F. Tong,et al.  Decoding the visual and subjective contents of the human brain , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Svetlana S. Georgieva,et al.  Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Adaptation and Size Invariance of Shape Processing by Humans and Monkeys , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Fast Readout of Object Identity from Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2005, Science.

[20]  Thomas Fevens,et al.  Toward Automatic Computer Aided Dental X-ray Analysis Using Level Set Method , 2005, MICCAI.

[21]  Janaina Mourão Miranda,et al.  Classifying brain states and determining the discriminating activation patterns: Support Vector Machine on functional MRI data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[22]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  G. Rees,et al.  Neuroimaging: Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  Sean M. Polyn,et al.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  D. Heeger,et al.  Two Retinotopic Visual Areas in Human Lateral Occipital Cortex , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  B. Wandell,et al.  Visual Field Maps in Human Cortex , 2007, Neuron.

[27]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Analyzing for information, not activation, to exploit high-resolution fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[28]  David D. Cox,et al.  Untangling invariant object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Only some spatial patterns of fMRI response are read out in task performance , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Lars Muckli,et al.  Time-dependent effects of hyperoxia on the BOLD fMRI signal in primate visual cortex and LGN , 2007, NeuroImage.

[31]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  fMRI Activity Patterns in Human LOC Carry Information about Object Exemplars within Category , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.