Generalizability of valuations on health states collected with the EuroQolc-questionnaire.

PROBLEM Non-response and non-usable response were found in population surveys on valuation of health states. If non-response is selective regarding valuations, then generalization of the resulting values to the whole survey population is not permitted. This could limit the use of empirical utility values in resource allocation in health care. METHODS Response behaviour of a sample of 1400 from the Dutch general population to the mailed EuroQolc-questionnaire was analyzed by four methods. I. Phoning resolute non-respondents; II. comparison of zip code characteristics of respondents and non-respondents (because individual data on background characteristics were not available for the non-respondents); III. analysis of response over time (wave-analysis); IV: comparison of background variables of successful (less than two valuations missing) and unsuccessful respondents, combined with analysis of the effect of these background variables on valuations. RESULTS No indications for selective non-response were found, although the phenomenon appeared hard to investigate. The successful response came from a slightly younger and better educated subsample. However, a general influence of age and educational level on valuations could not be shown. This finding is consistent with the literature. CONCLUSION Although the existence of selective non-response cannot be excluded, its relevance can be considered to be small. This finding is encouraging for the use of empirical utility values in allocative decisions.

[1]  R L Kane,et al.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--IV: Progress and a research agenda. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[2]  M. Drummond,et al.  Health Care Technology: Effectiveness, Efficiency and Public Policy@@@Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes , 1988 .

[3]  A. Williams EuroQol : a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life , 1990 .

[4]  D. Hadorn The role of public values in setting health care priorities. , 1991, Social science & medicine.

[5]  D. Leeuw,et al.  Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face Surveys. , 1992 .

[6]  G. Bonsel,et al.  Valuation of health states by the general public: feasibility of a standardized measurement procedure. , 1990, Social science & medicine.

[7]  R L Kane,et al.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--III: Population and context effects. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  E. Nord,et al.  EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Valuations of health states by the general public in Norway. , 1991, Health policy.

[9]  R L Kane,et al.  Methodology for measuring health-state preferences--I: Measurement strategies. , 1989, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  R. Hays,et al.  Multitrait-Multimethod Analysis of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measures , 1991, Medical care.

[11]  R. Brooks,et al.  EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Results of the Swedish questionnaire exercise. , 1991, Health policy.

[12]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .