Working in Noise with a Hearing Loss: Perceptions from Workers, Supervisors, and Hearing Conservation Program Managers

Objective: Workers with hearing loss face special problems, especially when working in noise. However, conventional hearing conservation practices do not distinguish between workers with normal hearing versus impaired hearing. This study collected information from workers with self-reported noise exposure and hearing loss, supervisors of such workers, and hearing conservation program managers through focus groups and in-depth interviews to evaluate their perspectives on the impact of hearing loss on safety and job performance, the use of hearing protection, and information needed to appropriately manage hearing-impaired workers who work in noisy environments. Results: Concerns about working in noise with a hearing loss could be grouped into the following 10 categories: impact on job performance, impact on job safety, impaired ability to hear warning signals, impaired ability to monitor equipment, interference with communication, stress and/or fatigue, impaired communication caused by hearing protector use, reduced ability to monitor the environment as the result of hearing protector use, concerns about future quality of life, and concerns about future employability. Mostly, there was an agreement between the perceptions of workers, supervisors, and hearing conservation program managers regarding difficulties associated with hearing loss and consequent needs. These findings suggest that noise-exposed workers with hearing loss face many of the same problems reported in the literature by noise-exposed workers with normal hearing, with additional concerns primarily about job safety as the result of a reduced ability to hear environmental sounds, warning signals, and so forth. Conclusions: The study outlines potential challenges regarding job safety and hearing conservation practices for noise-exposed, hearing-impaired workers. Awareness of these issues is a necessary first step toward providing appropriate protective measures for noise-exposed, hearing-impaired workers.

[1]  B. Rogers National Occupational Research Agenda , 1996, AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses.

[2]  Alice H Suter The Effects of Hearing Protectors on Speech Communication and the Perception of Warning Signals , 1989 .

[3]  Daniel J. Reschly,et al.  BOARD ON BEHAVIORAL, COGNITIVE, AND SENSORY SCIENCES , 2002 .

[4]  C. Giguere,et al.  Auditory perception with level-dependent hearing protectors. The effects of age and hearing loss. , 1993, Scandinavian audiology.

[5]  P. Geyer,et al.  Conditions Influencing the Availability of Accommodations for Workers Who Are Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing , 1999 .

[6]  S. Abel,et al.  Sound localization. The interaction of aging, hearing loss and hearing protection. , 1996, Scandinavian audiology.

[8]  P W Alberti,et al.  Speech intelligibility in noise: effects of fluency and hearing protector type. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Attitudes towards co-workers affected by occupational hearing loss. II: Focus groups interviews. , 1994, British journal of audiology.

[10]  Rena H. Glaser,et al.  Preventing Occupational Hearing Loss-A Practical Guide , 1997 .

[11]  R. Hetu,et al.  Can an inactivated hearing aid act as a hearing protector , 1992 .

[12]  P. Ries Prevalence and characteristics of persons with hearing trouble: United States, 1990-91. , 1994, Vital and health statistics. Series 10, Data from the National Health Survey.

[13]  G. Rösler Progression of hearing loss caused by occupational noise. , 1994, Scandinavian audiology.

[14]  H Kunov,et al.  Signal detection in industrial noise: effects of noise exposure history, hearing loss, and the use of ear protection. , 1985, Scandinavian audiology.

[15]  E. Krieg,et al.  Beliefs and attitudes among Swedish workers regarding the risk of hearing loss , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[16]  R. Hetu,et al.  The hearing aid as warning signal receiver in noisy workplaces , 1993 .

[17]  Robert A. Dobie,et al.  Hearing Loss: Determining Eligibility for Social Security Benefits , 2004 .

[18]  Carol Merry Stephenson,et al.  The contribution of focus groups in the evaluation of hearing conservation program (HCP) effectiveness. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[19]  Larry H. Royster,et al.  Chapter 5: Auditory and Nonauditory Effects of Noise , 2003 .

[20]  J. Haafkens,et al.  Building a self-management program for workers with a chronic somatic disease , 2012 .

[21]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Analyzing and Reporting Focus Group Results , 1997 .

[22]  Dayl L. Scherich Job Accommodations in the Workplace for Persons Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Current Practices and Recommendations , 1996 .

[23]  D. L. Spencer,et al.  Active noise reduction versus conventional hearing protection. Relative benefits for normal-hearing and impaired listeners. , 1997, Scandinavian audiology.

[24]  W. Noble Self-assessment of hearing and related functions , 1998 .

[25]  M. Fallsberg,et al.  Phenomenography as a qualitative approach in social pharmacy research. , 1991 .