Averaging and Metropolis Iterations For Positron Emission Tomography

Iterative positron emission tomography (PET) reconstruction computes projections between the voxel space and the lines of response (LOR) space, which are mathematically equivalent to the evaluation of multi-dimensional integrals. The dimension of the integration domain can be very high if scattering needs to be compensated. Monte Carlo (MC) quadrature is a straightforward method to approximate high-dimensional integrals. As the numbers of voxels and LORs can be in the order of hundred millions and the projection also depends on the measured object, the quadratures cannot be precomputed, but Monte Carlo simulation should take place on-the-fly during the iterative reconstruction process. This paper presents modifications of the maximum likelihood, expectation maximization (ML-EM) iteration scheme to reduce the reconstruction error due to the on-the-fly MC approximations of forward and back projections. If the MC sample locations are the same in every iteration step of the ML-EM scheme, then the approximation error will lead to a modified reconstruction result. However, when random estimates are statistically independent in different iteration steps, then the iteration may either diverge or fluctuate around the solution. Our goal is to increase the accuracy and the stability of the iterative solution while keeping the number of random samples and therefore the reconstruction time low. We first analyze the error behavior of ML-EM iteration with on-the-fly MC projections, then propose two solutions: averaging iteration and Metropolis iteration. Averaging iteration averages forward projection estimates during the iteration sequence. Metropolis iteration rejects those forward projection estimates that would compromise the reconstruction and also guarantees the unbiasedness of the tracer density estimate. We demonstrate that these techniques allow a significant reduction of the required number of samples and thus the reconstruction time. The proposed methods are built into the Teratomo system.

[1]  R. Leahy,et al.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  C Lartizien,et al.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  M. Rafecas,et al.  Use of a Monte Carlo-based probability matrix for 3-D iterative reconstruction of MADPET-II data , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[4]  P. Joseph An Improved Algorithm for Reprojecting Rays through Pixel Images , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  H. Zaidi,et al.  Advances in PET Image Reconstruction. , 2007, PET clinics.

[6]  László Szirmay-Kalos,et al.  Filtered sampling for PET , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[7]  G. Patay,et al.  Detector Modeling Techniques for Pre-Clinical 3 D PET Reconstruction on the GPU , 2010 .

[8]  Balazs Toth,et al.  Higher order scattering estimation for PET , 2012, 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[9]  R. Siddon Fast calculation of the exact radiological path for a three-dimensional CT array. , 1985, Medical physics.

[10]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Rik Van de Walle,et al.  Monte Carlo simulation in PET and SPECT instrumentation using GATE , 2004 .

[12]  László Szirmay-Kalos,et al.  Scatter Estimation for PET Reconstruction , 2010, NMA.

[13]  A. Cserkaszky,et al.  Implementation of 3D Monte Carlo PET reconstruction algorithm on GPU , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[14]  Vladimir Y. Panin,et al.  Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  László Szirmay-Kalos,et al.  Free Path Sampling in High Resolution Inhomogeneous Participating Media , 2011, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[16]  Jeih-San Liow,et al.  Design of a motion-compensation OSEM list-mode algorithm for resolution-recovery reconstruction for the HRRT , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[17]  Gianluigi Zanetti,et al.  Multi-ray-based system matrix generation for 3D PET reconstruction , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  D. Newport,et al.  A Single Scatter Simulation Technique for Scatter Correction in 3D PET , 1996 .

[19]  Guillem Pratx,et al.  Online detector response calculations for high-resolution PET image reconstruction , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[21]  I Buvat,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations in SPET and PET. , 2002, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[22]  J. Lantos,et al.  Detector response function of the NanoPET™/CT system , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[23]  Magdalena Rafecas,et al.  Comparison of basis functions for 3D PET reconstruction using a Monte Carlo system matrix , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  Fully 3D iterative scatter-corrected OSEM for HRRT PET using a GPU. , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.