Local negotiation and alignment of expectations and transfer of lessons in niche development trajectories : meta analysis of 22 new energy projects in Europe

This paper examines the tension between the need to maintain diversity and the need to support path creation in the promotion of emerging sustainable technologies. The analysis is framed within the niche development literature and in particular the dynamics of socio-cognitive technology evolution as elaborated by Geels and Raven (2006). This literature offers a framework for analyzing the relation between individual projects in local contexts and the transfer of local experiences into generally applicable rules on the ‘global niche level’. We address this question by examining two case studies drawn from a meta-analysis of 22 new energy projects throughout Europe. These two case studies, both pertaining to biogas projects for local municipalities, illustrate the diversity of applications introduced into a generic technology through processes of local variation and selection. We examine the diversity of expectations, and the negotiation and alignment of these expectations, underlying the diversity of local solutions. Moreover, we identify the types of generally applicable rules that the projects produced for the ‘global niche level’, and suggest that the transfer of lessons from individual local experiments can follow different pathways, but always requires due attention to the social and cultural limits to the transferability of solutions.

[1]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Transforming technological regimes for sustainable development: A role for alternative technology niches? , 2003 .

[2]  Theocharis Tsoutsos,et al.  The sustainable diffusion of renewable energy technologies as an example of an innovation-focused policy , 2005 .

[3]  Johan Schot,et al.  Experimenting for Sustainable Transport: The Approach of Strategic Niche Management , 2002 .

[4]  G. Rowe,et al.  Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda , 2004 .

[5]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[6]  G. Rowe,et al.  A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms , 2005 .

[7]  Bernhard Truffer,et al.  The coupling of viewing and doing: strategic niche management and the electrification of individual transport , 2002 .

[8]  Arie Rip,et al.  Constructing Transition Paths Through the Management of Niches , 2001 .

[9]  Jamil Khan The importance of local context in the planning of environmental projects: examples from two biogas cases , 2005 .

[10]  B. Brohmann,et al.  Factors influencing the societal acceptance of new energy technologies: Meta-analysis of recent european projects , 2007 .

[11]  The Coupling of Viewing and Doing , 2002 .

[12]  Jamil Khan,et al.  Local Politics of Renewable Energy: Project Planning, Siting Conflicts and Citizen Participation , 2004 .

[13]  Jamil Khan Siting conflicts in renewable energy projects in Sweden: a biogas case study , 2004 .

[14]  Adrian Smith Green Niches in Sustainable Development: The Case of Organic Food in the United Kingdom , 2006 .

[15]  Mike Hodson,et al.  Technological Transitions and Public Engagement: Competing Visions of a Hydrogen Fuel Station , 2007 .

[16]  Robin Williams,et al.  Social Shaping of Technology: Frameworks, Findings and Implications for Policy, with Glossary of Social Shaping Concepts , 2002 .

[17]  M. Hodson,et al.  Cities Mediating Technological Transitions: The Adaptability of Infrastructure and Infrastructures of Adaptability? , 2007 .

[18]  Mads Borup,et al.  The sociology of expectations in science and technology , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[19]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .