Comparing collaborative co-located and distributed design processes in digital and traditional sketching environments: A protocol study using the function-behaviour-structure coding scheme

This study compares the design processes of designers in both digital and traditional sketching environments, where the digital environment emulates the traditional face-to-face, pen-and-paper environment. The design processes were empirically examined through protocol analysis using a coding scheme based on the function–behaviour–structure ontology. The distributions of the different types of segments, and their transitions in the two environments were quantitatively compared using Chi-Square tests and Paired-T tests. The results indicate that the design processes in the two environments were not statistically different in terms of their distributions and transitions. The higher-level cognitive activities were not affected by the change of medium. Some implications for design computing and design practice are discussed.

[1]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[2]  Peter F. Patel-Schneider,et al.  Term Subsumption Languages in Knowledge Representation , 1990, AI Mag..

[3]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  The designer as a team o f one , 1995 .

[4]  V. Goel.  "Ill-Structured Representations" for Ill-Structured Problems , 1992 .

[5]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  What architects see in their sketches: implications for design tools , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[6]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[7]  Daniel M. Herbert,et al.  Study Drawings in Architectural Design: Their Properties as a Graphic Medium , 1988 .

[8]  Halime Demirkan,et al.  An insight on designers’ sketching activities in traditional versus digital media , 2003 .

[9]  V. Goel.  Sketches of thought , 1995 .

[10]  Kees Dorst,et al.  Comparing paradigms for describing design activity , 1995 .

[11]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[12]  John S. Gero,et al.  To sketch or not to sketch? That is the question , 2006 .

[13]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Macroscopic analysis of design processes based on a scheme for coding designers' cognitive actions , 1998 .

[14]  Ben Jonson,et al.  Design ideation: the conceptual sketch in the digital age , 2005 .

[15]  John S. Gero,et al.  An ontological account of donald schön's reflection in designing , 2008 .

[16]  John S. Gero,et al.  The Situated Function - Behaviour - Structure Framework , 2002, AID.

[17]  Ac Rianne Valkenburg,et al.  The reflective practice of design teams , 1998 .

[18]  PENG-WHAI Won.  THE COMPARISON BETWEEN VISUAL THINKING USING COMPUTER AND CONVENTIONAL MEDIA IN THE CONCEPT GENERATION STAGES OF DESIGN , 2001 .

[19]  Donald A. Sch.  The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action , 1983 .

[20]  Gabriela Goldschmidt.  Serial sketching: visual problem solving in designing , 1992 .

[21]  Casper G.C. van Dijk.  New insights in computer-aided conceptual design , 1995 .

[22]  John S. Gero,et al.  Understanding conceptual electronic design using protocol analysis , 1998 .

[23]  John S. Gero,et al.  An approach to the analysis of design protocols , 1998 .

[24]  G. Goldschmidt.  The dialectics of sketching , 1991 .

[25]  R. Michel.  Design research now : essays and selected projects , 2007 .

[26]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[27]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity , 2001 .

[28]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature , 2008 .

[29]  N. Cross.  Designerly ways of knowing , 2006 .

[30]  John S. Gero,et al.  Building Envelope Design Using Design Prototypes , 1990 .

[31]  Ch Kees Dorst,et al.  On the conceptual framework of John Gero's FBS-model and the prescriptive aims of design methodology , 2007 .

[32]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  What do architects and students perceive in their design sketches? A protocol analysis , 1997 .

[33]  Maarten van Someren,et al.  The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes , 1994 .

[34]  John S. Gero,et al.  Acquiring information from linkography in protocol studies of designing , 2008 .

[35]  R. Hamel,et al.  Creative discovery in imagery and perception: combining is relatively easy, restructuring takes a sketch. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[36]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design Prototypes: A Knowledge Representation Schema for Design , 1990, AI Mag..

[37]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[38]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[39]  Bryan Lawson,et al.  Computers, words and pictures , 1997 .

[40]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[41]  Philippe Kruchten,et al.  Casting software design in the function-behavior-structure framework , 2005, IEEE Software.

[42]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  Linkography : Assessing Design Productivity , 1990 .

[43]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Distributed Work , 2002 .

[44]  Beryl Plimmer,et al.  Computer-Aided Sketching to Capture Preliminary Design , 2002, AUIC.

[45]  W. Newstetter,et al.  Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education , 2001 .

[46]  Gabriela Goldschmidt,et al.  On visual design thinking: the vis kids of architecture , 1994 .

[47]  Jeff W. T. Kan,et al.  The Effect of Computer Mediation on Collaborative Designing , 2009, CAADRIA proceedings.

[48]  M. Prensky.  Do They Really Think Differently , 2001 .

[49]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design Computing and Cognition ’04 , 2011, Springer Netherlands.

[50]  John S. Gero,et al.  Drawings and the design process , 1998 .

[51]  Ellen Yi-Luen Do,et al.  Three R’s of Drawing and Design Computation , 2004 .

[52]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Analysing design activity , 1996 .

[53]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  A Room of Your Own: What Do We Learn about Support of Teamwork from Assessing Teams in Dedicated Project Rooms? , 1998, CoBuild.

[54]  Weiming Shen,et al.  Collaborative conceptual design - state of the art and future trends , 2002, Comput. Aided Des..

[55]  Robert Trappl,et al.  Cybernetics and systems '86 : proceedings of the Eighth European Meeting on Cybernetics and Systems Research , 1986 .

[56]  N. Chater,et al.  Proceedings of the fourteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society , 1992 .