Pipeline transport and simultaneous saccharification of corn stover.

Pipeline transport of corn stover delivered by truck from the field is evaluated against a range of truck transport costs. Corn stover transported by pipeline at 20% solids concentration (wet basis) or higher could directly enter an ethanol fermentation plant, and hence the investment in the pipeline inlet end processing facilities displaces comparable investment in the plant. At 20% solids, pipeline transport of corn stover costs less than trucking at capacities in excess of 1.4 M drytonnes/yr when compared to a mid range of truck transport cost (excluding any credit for economies of scale achieved in the ethanol fermentation plant from larger scale due to multiple pipelines). Pipelining of corn stover gives the opportunity to conduct simultaneous transport and saccharification (STS). If current enzymes are used, this would require elevated temperature. Heating of the slurry for STS, which in a fermentation plant is achieved from waste heat, is a significant cost element (more than 5 cents/l of ethanol) if done at the pipeline inlet unless waste heat is available, for example from an electric power plant located adjacent to the pipeline inlet. Heat loss in a 1.26 m pipeline carrying 2 M drytonnes/yr is about 5 degrees C at a distance of 400 km in typical prairie clay soils, and would not likely require insulation; smaller pipelines or different soil conditions might require insulation for STS. Saccharification in the pipeline would reduce the need for investment in the fermentation plant, saving about 0.2 cents/l of ethanol. Transport of corn stover in multiple pipelines offers the opportunity to develop a large ethanol fermentation plant, avoiding some of the diseconomies of scale that arise from smaller plants whose capacities are limited by issues of truck congestion.

[1]  Shahabaddine Sokhansanj,et al.  Engineering aspects of collecting corn stover for bioenergy , 2002 .

[2]  Kelly N. Ibsen,et al.  Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover , 2002 .

[3]  James S. Noble,et al.  Economic analysis of coal log pipeline transportation of coal , 1993 .

[4]  Amit Kumar,et al.  Pipeline transport of biomass , 2004, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[5]  Bryce J. Stokes,et al.  The transportation of fuelwood from forest to facility , 1995 .

[6]  A. Aden,et al.  Process Design Report for Stover Feedstock: Lignocellulosic Biomass to Ethanol Process Design and Economics Utilizing Co-Current Dilute Acid Prehydrolysis and Enzymatic Hydrolysis for Corn Stover , 2002 .

[7]  K. Kadam,et al.  Availability of corn stover as a sustainable feedstock for bioethanol production. , 2003, Bioresource technology.

[8]  D. Glassner,et al.  CORN STOVER COLLECTION PROJECT , 1998 .

[9]  K. Réczey,et al.  Pretreatment of corn stover using wet oxidation to enhance enzymatic digestibility , 2003, Applied biochemistry and biotechnology.

[10]  Bryan M. Jenkins,et al.  Equipment performance, costs and constraints in the commercial harvesting of rice straw for industrial applications , 2000 .

[11]  P. Flynn,et al.  Biomass power cost and optimum plant size in western Canada , 2003 .

[12]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Fuel supply strategies for large-scale bio-energy projects in developing countries. Electricity generation from agricultural and forest residues in Northeastern Thailand , 2001 .

[13]  H. Douglas Jose,et al.  NF96-310 Costs of Harvesting and Hauling Corn Stalks in Large Round Bales , 1996 .

[14]  J. R. Hettenhaus,et al.  Innovative Methods for Corn Stover Collecting, Handling, Storing and Transporting , 2004 .

[15]  Robert D. Perlack,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF OPTIONS FOR THE COLLECTION, HANDLING, AND TRANSPORT OF CORN STOVER , 2002 .