New insights on the modeling of the molecular mechanisms underlying neural maps alignment in the midbrain

We previously identified and modeled a principle of visual map alignment in the midbrain involving the mapping of the retinal projections and concurrent transposition of retinal guidance cues into the superior colliculus providing positional information for the organization of cortical V1 projections onto the retinal map (Savier et al., 2017). This principle relies on mechanisms involving Epha/Efna signaling, correlated neuronal activity and axon competition. Here, using the 3-step map alignment computational model, we predict and validate in vivo the visual mapping defects in a well-characterized mouse model. Our results challenge previous hypotheses and provide an alternative, although complementary, explanation for the phenotype observed. In addition, we propose a new quantification method to assess the degree of alignment and organization between maps, allowing inter-model comparisons. This work generalizes the validity and robustness of the 3-step map alignment algorithm as a predictive tool and confirms the basic mechanisms of visual map organization.

[1]  Jianhua Cang,et al.  Visual Cortex Modulates the Magnitude but Not the Selectivity of Looming-Evoked Responses in the Superior Colliculus of Awake Mice , 2014, Neuron.

[2]  Jianhua Cang,et al.  New Model of Retinocollicular Mapping Predicts the Mechanisms of Axonal Competition and Explains the Role of Reverse Molecular Signaling during Development , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Hisao Honda,et al.  Competition between Retinal Ganglion Axons for Targets under the Servomechanism Model Explains Abnormal Retinocollicular Projection of Eph Receptor-Overexpressing or Ephrin-Lacking Mice , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  D. Sterratt,et al.  Retinocollicular mapping explained? , 2013, Visual Neuroscience.

[5]  David A Feldheim,et al.  Ephrin-As and Patterned Retinal Activity Act Together in the Development of Topographic Maps in the Primary Visual System , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  D. Aunis,et al.  Implication of neuropilin 2/semaphorin 3F in retinocollicular map formation , 2008, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[7]  The maturation of corticocollicular neurons in mice. , 1999, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[8]  Alexei A Koulakov,et al.  A stochastic model for retinocollicular map development , 2003, BMC Neuroscience.

[9]  Greg Lemke,et al.  A relative signalling model for the formation of a topographic neural map , 2004, Nature.

[10]  Jun Xu,et al.  The development of retinotectal maps: a review of models based on molecular gradients. , 2005, Network.

[11]  A. Litke,et al.  Corticothalamic Axons Are Essential for Retinal Ganglion Cell Axon Targeting to the Mouse Dorsal Lateral Geniculate Nucleus , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Alexei A. Koulakov,et al.  A unifying model for activity-dependent and activity-independent mechanisms predicts complete structure of topographic maps in ephrin-A deficient mice , 2005, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[13]  H. Honda Competitive interactions between retinal ganglion axons for tectal targets explain plasticity of retinotectal projection in the servomechanism model of retinotectal mapping , 2004, Development, growth & differentiation.

[14]  B Efron,et al.  Statistical Data Analysis in the Computer Age , 1991, Science.

[15]  M. Stryker,et al.  Ephrin-As Guide the Formation of Functional Maps in the Visual Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[16]  Michael P. Stryker,et al.  Retinal Input Instructs Alignment of Visual Topographic Maps , 2009, Cell.

[17]  John G. Flanagan,et al.  Genetic Analysis of Ephrin-A2 and Ephrin-A5 Shows Their Requirement in Multiple Aspects of Retinocollicular Mapping , 2000, Neuron.

[18]  F. Pfrieger,et al.  Regional variations in the glial influence on synapse development in the mouse CNS , 2006, Journal of Physiology.

[19]  Uwe Drescher,et al.  Target-Independent EphrinA/EphA-Mediated Axon-Axon Repulsion as a Novel Element in Retinocollicular Mapping , 2014, Neuron.

[20]  Dmitry Tsigankov,et al.  Sperry versus Hebb: Topographic mapping in Isl2/EphA3 mutant mice , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[21]  E. Savier,et al.  Visual Maps Development: Reconsidering the Role of Retinal Efnas and Basic Principle of Map Alignment , 2018, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[22]  C. Blobel,et al.  Adam Meets Eph: An ADAM Substrate Recognition Module Acts as a Molecular Switch for Ephrin Cleavage In trans , 2005, Cell.

[23]  David Willshaw Analysis of mouse EphA knockins and knockouts suggests that retinal axons programme target cells to form ordered retinotopic maps , 2006, Development.

[24]  Greg Lemke,et al.  Genetic Dissection of EphA Receptor Signaling Dynamics during Retinotopic Mapping , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  M. A. Basso,et al.  Circuits for Action and Cognition: A View from the Superior Colliculus. , 2017, Annual review of vision science.

[26]  David C. Sterratt,et al.  Analysis of Local and Global Topographic Order in Mouse Retinocollicular Maps , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  Ian D. Thompson,et al.  Opposing Gradients of Ephrin-As and EphA7 in the Superior Colliculus Are Essential for Topographic Mapping in the Mammalian Visual System , 2005, Neuron.

[28]  Brian Zingg,et al.  Sensory Cortical Control of a Visually Induced Arrest Behavior via Corticotectal Projections , 2015, Neuron.

[29]  Jianhua Cang,et al.  Developmental mechanisms of topographic map formation and alignment. , 2013, Annual review of neuroscience.

[30]  Alexander Sher,et al.  Competition is a driving force in topographic mapping , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Elise Savier,et al.  A molecular mechanism for the topographic alignment of convergent neural maps , 2017, eLife.

[32]  R. Mooney,et al.  Subcortical projections of area 17 in the anophthalmic mouse. , 1985, Brain research.

[33]  Paul A Yates,et al.  Topographic Mapping from the Retina to the Midbrain Is Controlled by Relative but Not Absolute Levels of EphA Receptor Signaling , 2000, Cell.

[34]  M. Stryker,et al.  Genetic mechanisms control the linear scaling between related cortical primary and higher order sensory areas , 2015, eLife.

[35]  Michael P. Stryker,et al.  Stochastic Interaction between Neural Activity and Molecular Cues in the Formation of Topographic Maps , 2015, Neuron.

[36]  F. Charron,et al.  Sonic Hedgehog Is a Remotely Produced Cue that Controls Axon Guidance Trans-axonally at a Midline Choice Point , 2018, Neuron.

[37]  H. Heussler,et al.  Sonic hedgehog , 2003, Molecular pathology : MP.

[38]  Geoffrey J. Goodhill,et al.  A simple model can unify a broad range of phenomena in retinotectal map development , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.

[39]  David C Sterratt,et al.  Quantitative assessment of computational models for retinotopic map formation , 2015, Developmental neurobiology.

[40]  Michael C Crair,et al.  Role of emergent neural activity in visual map development , 2014, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[41]  John G Flanagan,et al.  Topographic Guidance Labels in a Sensory Projection to the Forebrain , 1998, Neuron.