Weak interactions, omnivory and emergent food-web properties

Empirical studies have shown that, in real ecosystems, species–interaction strengths are generally skewed in their distribution towards weak interactions. Some theoretical work also suggests that weak interactions, especially in omnivorous links, are important for the local stability of a community at equilibrium. However, the majority of theoretical studies use uniform distributions of interaction strengths to generate artificial communities for study. We investigate the effects of the underlying interaction–strength distribution upon the return time, permanence and feasibility of simple Lotka–Volterra equilibrium communities. We show that a skew towards weak interactions promotes local and global stability only when omnivory is present. It is found that skewed interaction strengths are an emergent property of stable omnivorous communities, and that this skew towards weak interactions creates a dynamic constraint maintaining omnivory. Omnivory is more likely to occur when omnivorous interactions are skewed towards weak interactions. However, a skew towards weak interactions increases the return time to equilibrium, delays the recovery of ecosystems and hence decreases the stability of a community. When no skew is imposed, the set of stable omnivorous communities shows an emergent distribution of skewed interaction strengths. Our results apply to both local and global concepts of stability and are robust to the definition of a feasible community. These results are discussed in the light of empirical data and other theoretical studies, in conjunction with their broader implications for community assembly.

[1]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  Community Food Webs: Data and Theory , 1990 .

[2]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Stability of feasible predator-prey systems , 1975, Nature.

[3]  V. Jansen,et al.  Variability in interaction strength and implications for biodiversity , 2002 .

[4]  Philip H. Warren,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation in the structure of a freshwater food web , 1989 .

[5]  W. Jansen,et al.  A permanence theorem for replicator and Lotka-Volterra systems , 1987 .

[6]  J. Timothy Wootton,et al.  THEORETICAL CONCEPTS AND EMPIRICAL APPROACHES TO MEASURING INTERACTION STRENGTH , 1998 .

[7]  E. Berlow,et al.  The Keystone Species Concept: Variation in Interaction Strength in a Rocky Intertidal Habitat , 1994 .

[8]  Richard Law,et al.  PERMANENCE AND THE ASSEMBLY OF ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITIES , 1996 .

[9]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[10]  F. Briand,et al.  Environmental Control of Food Web Structure , 1983 .

[11]  Josef Hofbauer,et al.  Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics , 1998 .

[12]  W. Fagan,et al.  Omnivory as a Stabilizing Feature of Natural Communities , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[13]  Sears,et al.  When is a trophic cascade a trophic cascade? , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  William R. Thomas,et al.  Feasibility and Stability in Community Dynamics , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[15]  Robert M. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  Joel E. Cohen,et al.  A stochastic theory of community food webs. III. Predicted and observed lengths of food chains , 1986, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[17]  Mark Huxham,et al.  Parasites and food web patterns , 1995 .

[18]  J. Castilla,et al.  Experimental determination of predation intensity in an intertidal predator guild: dominant versus subordinate prey , 2003 .

[19]  R. Paine,et al.  Food-web analysis through field measurement of per capita interaction strength , 1992, Nature.

[20]  R. Arditi,et al.  Logistic Theory of Food Web Dynamics , 1995 .

[21]  R. A. Beaver,et al.  On the Trophic Relations of Insects: A Food-Web Approach , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[22]  J. Lawton,et al.  Number of trophic levels in ecological communities , 1977, Nature.

[23]  V. Jansen,et al.  Complexity and stability revisited , 2003 .

[24]  Charles C. Elton,et al.  The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. , 1959 .

[25]  D. Haydon MAXIMALLY STABLE MODEL ECOSYSTEMS CAN BE HIGHLY CONNECTED , 2000 .

[26]  G. Polis,et al.  Time, Space, and Life History: Influences on Food Webs , 1996 .

[27]  B. Drossel,et al.  The influence of predator--prey population dynamics on the long-term evolution of food web structure. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[28]  K. Winemiller Spatial and Temporal Variation in Tropical Fish Trophic Networks , 1990 .

[29]  H. F. Nijhout,et al.  Stability in Real Food Webs: Weak Links in Long Loops , 2002 .

[30]  M. Emmerson,et al.  Predator–prey body size, interaction strength and the stability of a real food web , 2004 .

[31]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Predators, parasitoids and pathogens: species richness, trophic generality and body sizes in a natural food web , 2000 .

[32]  ALAN ROBERTS,et al.  The stability of a feasible random ecosystem , 1974, Nature.

[33]  Jónsson,et al.  Effects of Predator-prey Body Size Ratios on the Stability of Food Chains. , 1998, Journal of Theoretical Biology.

[34]  W. Fagan,et al.  Hatch Density Variation of a Generalist Arthropod Predator: Population Consequenes and Community Impact , 1994 .

[35]  Sanford,et al.  Regulation of keystone predation by small changes in ocean temperature , 1999, Science.

[36]  Jerry C. Blackford,et al.  Self-assembling food webs : a global viewpoint of coexistence of species in Lotka-Volterra communities , 1992 .

[37]  T. Schoener,et al.  Long-term variation in the effect of lizards on spider density is linked to rainfall , 1995, Oecologia.

[38]  R. May Food webs. , 1983, Science.

[39]  J. Lawton,et al.  On feeding on more than one trophic level , 1978, Nature.

[40]  Peter J. Morin,et al.  Food Web Architecture and Population Dynamics in Laboratory Microcosms of Protists , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[41]  R. Peters The Ecological Implications of Body Size , 1983 .

[42]  J. Fox,et al.  Stability and complexity in microcosm communities , 2002 .

[43]  B. Menge,et al.  Benthic-pelagic links and rocky intertidal communities: bottom-up effects on top-down control? , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  J. Wootton,et al.  ESTIMATES AND TESTS OF PER CAPITA INTERACTION STRENGTH: DIET, ABUNDANCE, AND IMPACT OF INTERTIDALLY FORAGING BIRDS , 1997 .

[45]  Stephen J. G. Hall,et al.  Assessing the Relative Importance of Trophic Links in Food Webs , 1996 .

[46]  A. Hastings,et al.  Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature , 1998, Nature.

[47]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Re–evaluating the omnivory–stability relationship in food webs , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[48]  V. Hutson,et al.  On the Conditions for Permanence of Species in Ecological Communities , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[49]  G. Polis,et al.  Complex Trophic Interactions in Deserts: An Empirical Critique of Food-Web Theory , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[50]  M. Holyoak,et al.  Omnivory and the stability of simple food webs , 1998, Oecologia.

[51]  B. Roitberg,et al.  Plant-feeding by arthropod predators contributes to the stability of predator-prey population dynamics , 1999 .

[52]  Guy Woodward,et al.  Invasion of a stream food web by a new top predator , 2001 .

[53]  A. Neutel,et al.  Energetics, Patterns of Interaction Strengths, and Stability in Real Ecosystems , 1995, Science.

[54]  S. Pimm The Balance of Nature?: Ecological Issues in the Conservation of Species and Communities , 1992 .

[55]  R. Macarthur Fluctuations of Animal Populations and a Measure of Community Stability , 1955 .

[56]  E. Berlow,et al.  QUANTIFYING VARIATION IN THE STRENGTHS OF SPECIES INTERACTIONS , 1999 .

[57]  Robert W. Sterner,et al.  THE ENIGMA OF FOOD CHAIN LENGTH: ABSENCE OF THEORETICAL EVIDENCE FOR DYNAMIC CONSTRAINTS , 1997 .

[58]  P. Yodzis,et al.  The stability of real ecosystems , 1981, Nature.