Explicit Kinetic Heterogeneity: Mathematical Models for Interpretation of Deuterium Labeling of Heterogeneous Cell Populations

Estimation of division and death rates of lymphocytes in different conditions is vital for quantitative understanding of the immune system. Deuterium, in the form of deuterated glucose or heavy water, can be used to measure rates of proliferation and death of lymphocytes in vivo. Inferring these rates from labeling and delabeling curves has been subject to considerable debate with different groups suggesting different mathematical models for that purpose. We show that the three most common models, which are based on quite different biological assumptions, actually predict mathematically identical labeling curves with one parameter for the exponential up and down slope, and one parameter defining the maximum labeling level. By extending these previous models, we here propose a novel approach for the analysis of data from deuterium labeling experiments. We construct a model of “kinetic heterogeneity” in which the total cell population consists of many sub-populations with different rates of cell turnover. In this model, for a given distribution of the rates of turnover, the predicted fraction of labeled DNA accumulated and lost can be calculated. Our model reproduces several previously made experimental observations, such as a negative correlation between the length of the labeling period and the rate at which labeled DNA is lost after label cessation. We demonstrate the reliability of the new explicit kinetic heterogeneity model by applying it to artificially generated datasets, and illustrate its usefulness by fitting experimental data. In contrast to previous models, the explicit kinetic heterogeneity model 1) provides a novel way of interpreting labeling data; 2) allows for a non-exponential loss of labeled cells during delabeling, and 3) can be used to describe data with variable labeling length.

[1]  José A. M. Borghans,et al.  Sparse production but preferential incorporation of recently produced naïve T cells in the human peripheral pool , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  Quantification of Cell Turnover Kinetics Using 5-Bromo-2′-deoxyuridine1 , 2000, The Journal of Immunology.

[3]  Z. Grossman,et al.  T Cell Turnover in SIV Infection , 1999, Science.

[4]  Dirk Homann,et al.  Differential regulation of antiviral T-cell immunity results in stable CD8+ but declining CD4+ T-cell memory , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[5]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  In vivo dynamics of T cell activation, proliferation, and death in HIV-1 infection: Why are CD4+ but not CD8+ T cells depleted? , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  R. D. de Boer,et al.  Do Most Lymphocytes in Humans Really Reside in the Gut? , 2022 .

[7]  Ronald B. Herberman,et al.  T Cell Turnover in SIV Infection , 1999 .

[8]  M. Hellerstein,et al.  Measurement of T-cell kinetics: recent methodologic advances. , 1999, Immunology today.

[9]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  Modeling deuterated glucose labeling of T-lymphocytes , 2002, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[10]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  Kinetics of Virus-Specific CD8+ T Cells and the Control of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection , 2004, Journal of Virology.

[11]  Martin Meier-Schellersheim,et al.  Pathogenesis of HIV infection: what the virus spares is as important as what it destroys , 2006, Nature Medicine.

[12]  J. Borghans,et al.  Lymphocyte kinetics in health and disease. , 2009, Trends in immunology.

[13]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[14]  Douglas M. Bates,et al.  Nonlinear Regression Analysis and Its Applications , 1988 .

[15]  Rustom Antia,et al.  The role of models in understanding CD8+ T-cell memory , 2005, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[16]  DAVID G. KENDALL,et al.  Introduction to Mathematical Statistics , 1947, Nature.

[17]  Becca Asquith,et al.  Lymphocyte kinetics: the interpretation of labelling data. , 2002, Trends in immunology.

[18]  J. Guardiola,et al.  Kinetics of In Vivo Proliferation and Death of Memory and Naive CD8 T Cells: Parameter Estimation Based on 5-Bromo-2′-Deoxyuridine Incorporation in Spleen, Lymph Nodes, and Bone Marrow 1 , 2008, The Journal of Immunology.

[19]  Steven G. Deeks,et al.  Directly measured kinetics of circulating T lymphocytes in normal and HIV-1-infected humans , 1999, Nature Medicine.

[20]  J. Altman,et al.  Counting antigen-specific CD8 T cells: a reevaluation of bystander activation during viral infection. , 1998, Immunity.

[21]  M. Hellerstein,et al.  Measurement of cell proliferation by labeling of DNA with stable isotope-labeled glucose: studies in vitro, in animals, and in humans. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  Estimating average cellular turnover from 5–bromo–2'–deoxyuridine (BrdU) measurements , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  Alan S. Perelson,et al.  Increased Turnover of T Lymphocytes in HIV-1 Infection and Its Reduction by Antiretroviral Therapy , 2001, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[24]  J. Borghans,et al.  Quantification of T‐cell dynamics: from telomeres to DNA labeling , 2007, Immunological reviews.

[25]  M. Hellerstein,et al.  Advances in the stable isotope-mass spectrometric measurement of DNA synthesis and cell proliferation. , 2001, Analytical biochemistry.