Integrated Task Planning based on Mobility of Mobile Manipulator (M2) Platform

This paper presents an optimized integrated task planning and control approach for manipulating a nonholonomic robot by mobile manipulators. Then, we derive a kinematics model and a mobility of the mobile manipulator(M2) platform considering it as the combined system of the manipulator and the mobile robot. to improve task execution efficiency utilizing the redundancy, optimal trajectory of the mobile manipulator(M2) platform are maintained while it is moving to a new task point. A cost function for optimality can be defined as a combination of the square errors of the desired and actual configurations of the mobile robot and of the task robot. In the combination of the two square errors, a newly defined mobility of a mobile robot is utilized as a weighting index. With the aid of the gradient method, the cost function is minimized, so the path trajectory that the M2 platform generates is optimized. The simulation results of the 2 ink planar nonholonomic M2 platform are given to show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm.

[1]  Gilles Foulon,et al.  Planning point to point paths for nonholonomic mobile manipulators , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[2]  Dong Xu,et al.  Trajectory Tracking Control of Omnidirectional Wheeled Mobile Manipulators: Robust Neural Network-Based Sliding Mode Approach , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics).

[3]  Dug Hun Hong Note on Fuzzy Random Renewal Process and Renewal Rewards Process , 2009, Int. J. Fuzzy Log. Intell. Syst..

[4]  Keum-Shik Hong,et al.  Inverse kinematics of a reclaimer: Closed-form solution by exploiting geometric constraints , 1997 .

[5]  F. Abdessemed Trajectory generation for mobile manipulators using a learning method , 2007, 2007 Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation.

[6]  Matthew T. Mason,et al.  Compliance and Force Control for Computer Controlled Manipulators , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[7]  Stephen L. Chiu,et al.  Task Compatibility of Manipulator Postures , 1988, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[8]  James C. Alexander,et al.  Shortest distance paths for wheeled mobile robots , 1998, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[9]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Closed loop steering of unicycle like vehicles via Lyapunov techniques , 1995, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[10]  Myung Hwangbo,et al.  Motion planning for a mobile manipulator with imprecise locomotion , 2003, Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453).

[11]  Jang Myung Lee,et al.  Dynamic modeling and cooperative control of a redundant manipulator based on decomposition , 1998 .

[12]  Michael Beetz,et al.  Positioning mobile manipulators to perform constrained linear trajectories , 2008, 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Kostas J. Kyriakopoulos,et al.  Nonholonomic motion planning for mobile manipulators , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[14]  Zhen-Shu Mi,et al.  Intelligent 3D Obstacles Recognition Technique Based on Support Vector Machines for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles , 2009, Int. J. Fuzzy Log. Intell. Syst..

[15]  Dong Xu,et al.  Robust adaptive tracking control of omnidirecitonal wheeled mobile manipulators , 2007, 2007 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[16]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Robot dynamics and control , 1989 .