Perspective changes everything: managing ecosystems from the inside out

In the past, environmental managers could behave as if they were managing a “natural” system to which they were external; criteria for successful management could be derived from historical data or from current pristine systems elsewhere in the world. With a few localized exceptions, this approach is no longer viable. Most of the ecosystems for which critical and urgent decisions need to be made are best seen as complex ecosocial systems, with people firmly embedded as an integral element. We can no longer manage ecosystems per se, but rather we must learn to manage our interactions within our ecological context. This view, which incorporates notions of multiple, interacting, nested hierarchies, feedback loops across space and time, and radical uncertainty with regard to prediction of system behavior, requires rethinking. How should we now think about science and science-based management? Post-normal science, complex systems theories, and the creation of collective narratives offer the best hope for making progress in this field. We use several ecosystem management and community health programs in Peru, Kenya, and Nepal to demonstrate the characteristics necessary for this kind of “inside-out” approach.

[1]  James J. Kay,et al.  ------------------------------------------------------------------------Embracing Complexity : The Challenge of the Ecosystem Approach , 1994 .

[2]  James J. Kay,et al.  An ecosystem approach for sustainability: addressing the challenge of complexity , 1999 .

[3]  Arthur Koestler,et al.  Janus: A Summing Up , 1978 .

[4]  R. Chambers,et al.  Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century , 1992 .

[5]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  EMERGENT COMPLEX SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[6]  I. Scoones Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis , 1998 .

[7]  D Waltner-Toews,et al.  Emergent perplexity: in search of post-normal questions for community and agroecosystem health. , 1997, Social science & medicine.

[8]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  Risk management and governance:: a post-normal science approach , 1999 .

[9]  David Waltner-Toews,et al.  Adaptive Methodology for Ecosystem Sustainability and Health (AMESH): An Introduction , 2004 .

[10]  E. D. Schneider,et al.  Complexity and thermodynamics: Towards a new ecology , 1994 .

[11]  J. Ravetz Experiencing the future , 1999 .

[12]  T. Allen,et al.  Dragnet Ecology—“Just the Facts, Ma'am”: The Privilege of Science in a Postmodern World , 2001 .

[13]  T. Allen,et al.  Toward a Unified Ecology. , 1994 .

[14]  Peter Checkland New maps of knowledge some animadversions (friendly) on: science (reductionist), social science (hermeneutic), research (unmanageable) and universities (unmanaged) , 2000 .

[15]  S. Funtowicz,et al.  Science for the Post-Normal Age , 1993, Commonplace.

[16]  B. V. D. Meulen The impact of foresight on environmental science and technology policy in the Netherlands , 1999 .

[17]  Robert Costanza,et al.  Ecosystem Health New Goals for Environmental Management , 1992 .