UNDERSTANDING INSURGENCY BY USING AGENT-BASED COMPUTATIONAL EXPERIMENTATION: CASE STUDY OF INDONESIA

Intra-state conflict is becoming an endemic feature of the post-Cold-War era, increasingly challenging international stability and security. Specifically, protracted violent conflict in the form of insurgency is being predicted as the most likely form of future warfare. This highlights the necessity of understanding the conditions under which tensions emerge within a state and converge toward violent conflict. In this paper, we use agent-based modeling as an integrative tool to understand the conditions that favor the emergence, duration, and intensity of insurgency. We present a Virtual International System developed in the Synthetic Environment for Analysis and Simulation (SEAS-VIS) to analyze insurgency in a strife-torn region of the world. SEAS-VIS provides an environment in which to conduct computational experimentation as a way to begin to understand the largely qualitative aspects of insurgency. The theoretical models used in building SEAS-VIS agents are calibrated from open-source data and validated against published real-world incidents. We then use the validated SEAS-VIS to analyze dynamic interrelationships among grievances, level of resources, and organizational capacity to mobilize members toward social action.

[1]  T. Gurr,et al.  Why Men Rebel. , 1970 .

[2]  J. D. McCarthy,et al.  Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[3]  C. Tilly From mobilization to revolution , 1978 .

[4]  J. Craig Jenkins,et al.  Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements , 1983 .

[5]  Bert Klandermans,et al.  MOBILIZATION AND PARTICIPATION: SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGICAL EXPANSIONS OF RESOURCE MOBILIZATION THEORY* , 1984 .

[6]  Dirk Oegema,et al.  POTENTIALS, NETWORKS, MOTIVATIONS, AND BARRIERS: STEPS TOWARDS PARTICIPATION IN SOCIAL MOVEMENTS * , 1987 .

[7]  Robert D. Benford,et al.  Master-frames and cycles of protest , 1992 .

[8]  Ed Diener,et al.  The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute? , 1993 .

[9]  S. Tarrow,et al.  Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics , 1994 .

[10]  E. Diener,et al.  Resources, personal strivings, and subjective well-being: a nomothetic and idiographic approach. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  Blue Dreams: Korean Americans and the Los Angeles Riots , 1995 .

[12]  M. Lichbach The Rebel's Dilemma , 1995 .

[13]  Eunkook M. Suh,et al.  Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events matter. , 1996 .

[14]  Paul R. Brass,et al.  Theft of an Idol: Text and Context in the Representation of Collective Violence , 1997, The Journal of Asian Studies.

[15]  Robert Axelrod Advancing the art of simulation in the social sciences , 1997 .

[16]  Ed Diener,et al.  Subjective well-being and age: An international analysis. , 1998 .

[17]  Ravi Bhavnani,et al.  Localized Ethnic Conflict and Genocide , 2000 .

[18]  P. Collier,et al.  Greed and Grievance in Civil War , 1999 .

[19]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Subjective Weil-Being: Three Decades of Progress , 2004 .

[20]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Well-being : the foundations of hedonic psychology , 1999 .

[21]  Joshua M. Epstein,et al.  Modeling civil violence: An agent-based computational approach , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  S. Murshed,et al.  Conflict in Africa : The Cost of Peaceful Behaviour , 2002 .

[23]  Luis Almeida Costa,et al.  Towards an Organizational Model of Attitude Change , 2002, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[24]  Claire Wagner,et al.  The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  A. Krueger,et al.  Education, Poverty, Political Violence and Terrorism: Is There a Causal Connection? , 2002 .

[26]  S. Gates,et al.  The Geography of Civil War , 2002 .

[27]  Ross A. Hammond,et al.  The Evolution of Ethnocentric Behavior , 2003 .

[28]  J. Fearon,et al.  Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War , 2003, American Political Science Review.

[29]  J. Post,et al.  The terrorists in their own words: Interviews with 35 incarcerated Middle Eastern terrorists**This research was conducted with the support of the Smith Richardson Foundation. , 2003 .

[30]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Artificial Societies , 2003 .

[31]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Reexamining adaptation and the set point model of happiness: reactions to changes in marital status. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  Armano Srbljinovic,et al.  An Agent-Based Model of Ethnic Mobilisation , 2003, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[33]  Michael L. Ross,et al.  How Do Natural Resources Influence Civil War? Evidence from Thirteen Cases , 2004, International Organization.

[34]  Support and Nonsupport for Nationalist Rebellion: A Prospect Theory Approach , 2004 .

[35]  N. Boudriga,et al.  Intelligent agents on the Web: a review , 2004, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[36]  Ian S. Lustick,et al.  Secessionism in Multicultural States: Does Sharing Power Prevent or Encourage It? , 2004, American Political Science Review.

[37]  J. Fearon Why Do Some Civil Wars Last So Much Longer than Others? , 2004 .

[38]  Macartan Humphreys,et al.  Natural Resources, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution , 2005 .

[39]  Daniel R. Dolk,et al.  Agent-based simulation for computational experimentation: Developing an artificial labor market , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[40]  Nils Petter Gleditsch,et al.  A Diamond Curse? , 2005 .

[41]  Patrick M. Regan,et al.  Greed, Grievance, and Mobilization in Civil Wars , 2005 .

[42]  J. Victoroff The Mind of the Terrorist , 2005 .

[43]  S. Lyubomirsky,et al.  Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change , 2005 .

[44]  Marie Besançon Relative Resources: Inequality in Ethnic Wars, Revolutions, and Genocides , 2005 .