DNA variation and brain region-specific expression profiles exhibit different relationships between inbred mouse strains: implications for eQTL mapping studies

BackgroundExpression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) mapping is used to find loci that are responsible for the transcriptional activity of a particular gene. In recent eQTL studies, expression profiles were derived from either homogenized whole brain or collections of large brain regions. However, the brain is a very heterogeneous organ, and expression profiles of different brain regions vary significantly. Because of the importance and potential power of eQTL studies in identifying regulatory networks, we analyzed gene expression patterns in different brain regions from multiple inbred mouse strains and investigated the implications for the design and analysis of eQTL studies.ResultsGene expression profiles of five brain regions in six inbred mouse strains were studied. Few genes exhibited a significant strain-specific expression pattern, whereas a large number of genes exhibited brain region-specific patterns. We constructed phylogenetic trees based on the expression relationships between the strains and compared them with a DNA-level relationship tree. The trees based on the expression of strain-specific genes were constant across brain regions and mirrored DNA-level variation. However, the trees based on region-specific genes exhibited a different set of strain relationships, depending on the brain region. An eQTL analysis showed enrichment of cis-acting regulators among strain-specific genes, whereas brain region-specific genes appear to be mainly regulated by trans-acting elements.ConclusionOur results suggest that many regulatory networks are highly brain region specific and indicate the importance of conducting eQTL mapping studies using data from brain regions or tissues that are physiologically and phenotypically relevant to the trait of interest.

[1]  E. Petretto,et al.  Integrated transcriptional profiling and linkage analysis for identification of genes underlying disease , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[2]  Matthew A. Zapala,et al.  Adult mouse brain gene expression patterns bear an embryologic imprint. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  R. Nussbaum,et al.  The development of a highly informative mouse Simple Sequence Length Polymorphism (SSLP) marker set and construction of a mouse family tree using parsimony analysis. , 2003, Genome research.

[4]  Eric E. Schadt,et al.  Glyoxalase 1 and glutathione reductase 1 regulate anxiety in mice , 2005, Nature.

[5]  Serge Batalov,et al.  Use of a Dense Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Map for In Silico Mapping in the Mouse , 2004, PLoS biology.

[6]  John D. Storey,et al.  Statistical significance for genomewide studies , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  C. Molony,et al.  Genetic analysis of genome-wide variation in human gene expression , 2004, Nature.

[8]  Eric E Schadt,et al.  Integrating QTL and high-density SNP analyses in mice to identify Insig2 as a susceptibility gene for plasma cholesterol levels. , 2005, Genomics.

[9]  L. Kruglyak,et al.  Simultaneous genotyping, gene-expression measurement, and detection of allele-specific expression with oligonucleotide arrays. , 2005, Genome research.

[10]  Robert W. Williams,et al.  Complex trait analysis of gene expression uncovers polygenic and pleiotropic networks that modulate nervous system function , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[11]  R. Stoughton,et al.  Genetics of gene expression surveyed in maize, mouse and man , 2003, Nature.

[12]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[13]  L. Wodicka,et al.  Regional and strain-specific gene expression mapping in the adult mouse brain. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Matthew A. Zapala,et al.  Elevated gene expression levels distinguish human from non-human primate brains , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  L. Kruglyak,et al.  Genetic Dissection of Transcriptional Regulation in Budding Yeast , 2002, Science.

[16]  L. Wodicka,et al.  Genome-wide expression monitoring in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1997, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  W. Atchley,et al.  Genetic affinities of inbred mouse strains of uncertain origin. , 1993, Molecular biology and evolution.

[18]  Shigeo Yoshida,et al.  Mechanisms of aging in senescence-accelerated mice , 2005, Genome Biology.

[19]  Sudhir Kumar,et al.  MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment , 2004, Briefings Bioinform..

[20]  Janan T. Eppig,et al.  Genealogies of mouse inbred strains , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[21]  Detlef Weigel,et al.  Large-scale identification of single-feature polymorphisms in complex genomes. , 2003, Genome research.

[22]  E. Schadt,et al.  Genetic inheritance of gene expression in human cell lines. , 2004, American journal of human genetics.