Making virtual teams more effective: improving relational links

Purpose – To report on a study testing training methods to improve communications among virtual team members.Design/methodology/approach – Training methods for improving virtual team communications were developed and administered to 12 virtual teams. Surveys tracking cohesiveness, perceptions of the process and satisfaction with the outcomes were administered before, during and after teams working on a series of projects. These results were compared with similar teams working on the same projects who did not receive training.Findings – Results indicated that teams receiving training showed more cohesiveness, perceptions of the process and satisfaction. These factors have been shown to increase team members' ability to exchange information and to positively affect the group's performance.Practical implications – Relational link training seems beneficial for virtual teams as the teams in this study that had relational link training showed higher levels of group cohesiveness, satisfaction with their group's ...

[1]  J. Walther.  Group and Interpersonal Effects in International Computer-Mediated Collaboration , 1997 .

[2]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Distributed Work , 2002 .

[3]  J. F. Nunamaker,et al.  Experience with and future challenges in GDSS (group decision support systems): Preface , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[4]  S. Seashore.  Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group , 1955 .

[5]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Training to improve virtual team communication , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[6]  Morgan M. Shepherd,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Internet Testing: Lower Perceived Performance , 2004 .

[7]  J M Schraagen,et al.  Effects of two types of intra-team feedback on developing a shared mental model in Command & Control teams , 2000, Ergonomics.

[8]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Interactivity and Communication Mode Choice in Ongoing Management Groups , 1993, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  --Understanding Effects of Proximity on Collaboration : Implications for Technologies to Support Remote Collaborative Work , 2001 .

[10]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Using Two Different Electronic Meeting System Tools for the Same Task: An Experimental Comparison , 1990, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design/Manufacturing Interface , 1995 .

[12]  Deborah L. Duarte,et al.  Mastering Virtual Teams , 2000 .

[13]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[14]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Electronic meeting systems , 1991, CACM.

[15]  Kipling D. Williams,et al.  Interpersonal Relations and Group Processes Social Loafing: a Meta-analytic Review and Theoretical Integration , 2022 .

[16]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[17]  Edward A. Mabry,et al.  The dynamics of small group communication , 1980 .

[18]  Kregg Aytes,et al.  Do Some Things Change Faster than Others? The Dynamics of Behavioral Change in Computer-Supported Groups , 2002 .

[19]  C. R. Evans,et al.  Group Cohesion and Performance , 1991 .

[20]  J. Valacich,et al.  Idea Generation in Computer-Based Groups: A New Ending to an Old Story , 1994 .

[21]  R. Keller,et al.  Predictors of the Performance of Project Groups in R & D Organizations , 1986 .

[22]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Utilizing GDSS technology: Final report on a recent empirical study , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[23]  N. Melone.  A theoretical assessment of the user-satisfaction construct in information systems research , 1990 .

[24]  John W. Sweeney.  An experimental investigation of the free-rider problem , 1973 .

[25]  J. Walther.  Anticipated Ongoing Interaction Versus Channel Effects on Relational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1994 .

[26]  Fred Niederman,et al.  Issues and Concerns About Computer-Supported Meetings: The Facilitator's Perspective , 1996, MIS Q..

[27]  B. Fisher.  Small Group Decision Making: Communication and the Group Process , 1980 .

[28]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  1001 Unanswered Research Questions in GSS , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Developmental differences between distributed and face-to-face groups in electronically supported meeting environments: An exploratory investigation , 1995 .

[30]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[31]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Experience at IBM with group support systems: A field study , 1989, Decis. Support Syst..

[32]  Deborah H. Gruenfeld,et al.  Groups, Tasks, and Technology , 1993 .

[33]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[34]  J. Walther.  Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction , 1992 .

[35]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[36]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Virtual Teams versus Face-to-Face Teams: An Exploratory Study of a Web-based Conference System* , 1997 .

[37]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[38]  J. McGrath.  Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[39]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[40]  John Locke,et al.  Evolution of relational factors over time: a study of distributed and nondistributed meetings , 1995, Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[41]  S. R. Hiltz,et al.  Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. , 1986 .

[42]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[43]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups , 1996, MIS Q..

[44]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[45]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  A Short Form Measure of User Information Satisfaction: A Psychometric Evaluation and Notes on Use , 1987, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Blake Ives,et al.  The measurement of user information satisfaction , 1983, CACM.

[47]  Stephen Soldz,et al.  What is Cohesiveness? , 1993 .

[48]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[49]  Susan Rebstock Williams,et al.  Group Support Systems, Power, and Influence in an Organization: A Field Study , 1997 .

[50]  Robert J. McQueen,et al.  Using Groupware in Quality Management Programs , 1997, Inf. Syst. Manag..