EFFECT OF MUSCLES ACTIVATION ON HEAD-NECK COMPLEX UNDER SIMULATED EJECTION

A detailed three-dimensional head-neck (C0–C7) finite element (FE) model developed based on the actual geometry of an embalmed human cadaver specimen was exercised to dictate the motions of the cervical spine under dynamic loadings. The predicted results analyzed under vertex drop impact were compared against experimental study to validate the FE model. The validated C0–C7 FE model was then further analyzed to investigate the response of the whole head-neck complex under 10G-ejection condition. From the simulation of ejection process, obvious hyper-flexion of the head-neck complex could be found. The peak flexion angles of all the lower motion segments were beyond physiological tolerance indicating a potential injury in these regions. Furthermore, the stress values in the spine were also related to the magnitudes of rotation of the motion segments. During the acceleration onset stage, the maximum stresses in the bone components were low. After that, the stress values increased sharply into the dangerous range with increased rotational angles. The effect of muscles in alleviating the potential damage in the neck is significant. It was implied that it is important for pilots to stiffen the neck before ejection to avoid severe cervical injury.

[1]  J. Cholewicki,et al.  Mechanical Properties of the Human Cervical Spine as Shown by Three-Dimensional Load–Displacement Curves , 2001, Spine.

[2]  B S Myers,et al.  Surface friction in near-vertex head and neck impact increases risk of injury. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  M Nissan,et al.  A Study of Vertebra and Disc Geometric Relations of the Human Cervical and Lumbar Spine , 1986, Spine.

[4]  Vijay K. Goel,et al.  Impact Response of the Intervertebral Disc in a Finite-Element Model , 2000, Spine.

[5]  Roger W. Nightingale,et al.  The Effects of Padded Surfaces on the Risk for Cervical Spine Injury , 1997, Spine.

[6]  M. Panjabi Cervical Spine Models for Biomechanical Research , 1998, Spine.

[7]  W C Hayes,et al.  Load Sharing Between the Shell and Centrum in the Lumbar Vertebral Body , 1997, Spine.

[8]  A Linder,et al.  A new mathematical neck model for a low-velocity rear-end impact dummy: evaluation of components influencing head kinematics. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  W. Hayes,et al.  The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  Jiri Dvorak,et al.  Mechanism of whiplash injury. , 1998, Clinical Biomechanics.

[11]  V. Goel,et al.  Biomechanical rationale for the pathology of rheumatoid arthritis in the craniovertebral junction. , 2000, Spine.

[12]  E C Teo,et al.  First cervical vertebra (atlas) fracture mechanism studies using finite element method. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  W Goldsmith,et al.  Response of a human head/neck/upper-torso replica to dynamic loading--II. Analytical/numerical model. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  E. Teo,et al.  Nonlinear finite-element analysis of the lower cervical spine (C4-C6) under axial loading. , 2001, Journal of spinal disorders.

[15]  N. Yoganandan,et al.  Finite element applications in human cervical spine modeling. , 1996, Spine.

[16]  A. Race,et al.  Effect of loading rate and hydration on the mechanical properties of the disc. , 2000, Spine.

[17]  L. Gibson,et al.  Modeling the mechanical behavior of vertebral trabecular bone: effects of age-related changes in microstructure. , 1997, Bone.

[18]  T. Einhorn Bone strength: The bottom line , 1992, Calcified Tissue International.

[19]  V. Goel,et al.  Prediction of Load Sharing Among Spinal Components of a C5‐C6 Motion Segment Using the Finite Element Approach , 1998, Spine.