Model fitting of PET time activity curves (TACs) is typically accomplished according to the least squares (LS) criterion, which is optimal for data with Gaussian distributed errors, but not robust in the presence of outliers (e.g., head motion). In contrast, quantile regression (QR) is an alternative for robust fitting that provides estimates not heavily influenced by outliers only losing a little efficiency, relative to LS, when no outliers are present. A data adaptive (DA) approach, relying on the rationale that QR should be used when outliers are present and LS otherwise, chooses LS or QR based solely on the observed TAC by measuring the influentiality of each TAC point and using QR when the maximum influentiality among the TAC points is higher than a given threshold. We first compare the results of applying DA to those using LS on a group of 24 healthy controls studied with [11C]-DASB to investigate whether DA improves the accuracy of parameter estimates. We also studied the application of DA to a test-retest data set of 11 controls to determine whether DA improves test-retest reproducibility. DA decreases the standard deviation (SD) of the radioligand distribution volume (VT) (relative improvement range: 0.12% -2.59%), while keeping the within-group average VT values almost unchanged. This ~2.5% decrease in SD would result in a ~5% decrease in the number of subjects needed to maintain the same statistical power when doing group comparisons. For the test-retest data, DA reduces the VT percent difference (PD) by 0.01% - 4.39% in 63% of the regions for the majority of test-retest pairs. The practical import of this reduction in the SD and PD, achievable by simply implementing a different fitting approach, is smaller required sample size to detect differences between groups and enhanced test-retest experiments reproducibility (i.e. improved sensitivity in occupancy studies).
[1]
S. Weisberg,et al.
Residuals and Influence in Regression
,
1982
.
[2]
Chung Chang,et al.
Robust fitting for neuroreceptor mapping
,
2009,
Statistics in medicine.
[3]
D E Kuhl,et al.
Quantification of Muscarinic Cholinergic Receptors with [11C]NMPB and Positron Emission Tomography: Method Development and Differentiation of Tracer Delivery from Receptor Binding
,
1998,
Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.
[4]
R. Ogden,et al.
In vivo quantification of serotonin transporters using [C-11]DASB and positron emission tomography in humans: modeling considerations (vol 27, pg 205, 2007)
,
2007
.
[5]
R. Koenker,et al.
An interior point algorithm for nonlinear quantile regression
,
1996
.
[6]
R. V. Van Heertum,et al.
Metabolite considerations in the in vivo quantification of serotonin transporters using 11C-DASB and PET in humans.
,
2006,
Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[7]
B. Ripley,et al.
Robust Statistics
,
2018,
Encyclopedia of Mathematical Geosciences.
[8]
Marie-José Bélanger,et al.
Biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of [11C]DASB in baboons.
,
2004,
Nuclear medicine and biology.