Davis and Sacramento, California Primary myocardial diseases have traditionally been classified into congestive, hypertrophlc and restrictive varieties. M mode echocardiography has proved extremely valuable in distinguishing congestive cardiomyopathy with major ventricular dilation and poor contractile performance from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with predominant left ventricular hypertrophy (septum greater than posterior wall) and normal pump performance, and restrictive disorders with symmetric ventricular wall thickening and normal or dlminished contractile function. The contributions of two dimensional echocardiography to the evaluation of patients with congestive or restrictive cardiomyopathy have been limited to certain specific situations, such as the recognition of left ventricular mural thrombi. Twenty-five patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were studied to assess two dimensional echocardiography in the evaluation of patients with this disorder, Two dimensional echocardiography indicated that hypertrophy of the interventricular septum is not uniform from apex to base in all patients but may be greatest in the apical, mid or basal third. In addition, the anterior free wall of the left ventricle was involved in the hypertrophic process in approximately 50 percent of patients. Two dimenslonal echocardkqraphy documented that the location of systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is most often at the junction of the mitral valve leaflets and chordae tendineae, although the chordae themselves and even the papillary muscles may be involved in thls movement. The heterogeneity of these characteristics may enable patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy to be classified into subsets of patients in whom meaningful therapeutic and prognostic implications may be derived. Finally, data derived from two dimensional echocardiography have shown that, although the left ventricle in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy conforms in some degree to the configuration of a catenoid, this geometric conformation is unlikely to account for the genesis of this disorder.
[1]
J. French,et al.
Idiopathic Hypertrophic Subaortic Stenosis Viewed by Wide-Angle, Phased-Array Echocardiography
,
1979,
Circulation.
[2]
G. Hutchins,et al.
Catenoid Shape of the Interventricular Septum: Possible Cause of Idiopathic Hypertrophic Subaortic Stenosis
,
1978,
Circulation.
[3]
W. Henry,et al.
Echocardiographic observations in patients with systemic infiltrative disease involving the heart.
,
1977,
The American journal of cardiology.
[4]
R. Macalpin,et al.
Echocardiographic manifestations of infiltrative cardiomyopathy. A report of seven cases due to amyloid.
,
1976,
Chest.
[5]
J. Gehrke.
Proceedings: New observations on systolic anterior motion of mitral valve leaflets in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
,
1976,
British heart journal.
[6]
J. Griffith,et al.
Mechanism of left ventricular outlfow obstruction in patients with obstructive asymmetric septal hypertrophy (idiopathic hypertrophic subaortic stenosis).
,
1975,
The American journal of cardiology.
[7]
R. Popp,et al.
Echocardiographic Criteria in the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Hypertrophic Subaortic Stenosis
,
1974,
Circulation.
[8]
R. Chahine,et al.
Ultrasound in the diagnosis of primary congestive cardiomyopathy.
,
1973,
Chest.
[9]
W. Henry,et al.
Asymmetric Septal Hypertrophy: Echocardiographic Identification of the Pathognomonic Anatomic Abnormality of IHSS
,
1973,
Circulation.
[10]
R. Macalpin,et al.
Echocardiographic Diagnosis of Idiopathic Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy without Outflow Obstruction
,
1972,
Circulation.
[11]
Goodwin Je.
Clarification of the cardiomyopathies.
,
1972
.
[12]
J. Goodwin.
Congestive and hypertrophic cardiomyopathies. A decade of study.
,
1970,
Lancet.
[13]
D TEARE,et al.
ASYMMETRICAL HYPERTROPHY OF THE HEART IN YOUNG ADULTS
,
1958,
British heart journal.