A Novel PF-LSSVR-based Framework for Failure Prognosis of Nonlinear Systems with Time-varying Parameters

Particle filtering (PF) is being applied successfully in nonlinear and/or non-Gaussian system failure prognosis. However, for failure prediction of many complex systems whose dynamic state evolution models involve time-varying parameters, the traditional PF-based prognosis framework will probably generate serious deviations in results since it implements prediction through iterative calculation using the state models. To address the problem, this paper develops a novel integrated PF-LSSVR framework based on PF and least squares support vector regression (LSSVR) for nonlinear system failure prognosis. This approach employs LSSVR for long-term observation series prediction and applies PF-based dual estimation to collaboratively estimate the values of system states and parameters of the corresponding future time instances. Meantime, the propagation of prediction uncertainty is emphatically taken into account. Therefore, PF-LSSVR avoids over-dependency on system state models in prediction phase. With a two-sided failure definition, the probability distribution of system remaining useful life (RUL) is accessed and the corresponding methods of calculating performance evaluation metrics are put forward. The PF-LSSVR framework is applied to a three-vessel water tank system failure prognosis and it has much higher prediction accuracy and confidence level than traditional PF-based framework.

[1]  Sankalita Saha,et al.  On Applying the Prognostic Performance Metrics , 2009 .

[2]  Neil J. Gordon,et al.  A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  LI Xun-ming Error prediction based on least squares support vector machines , 2009 .

[4]  Michael Pecht A Prognostics and Health Management Roadmap for Information and Electronics-Rich Systems , 2009 .

[5]  Rudolph van der Merwe,et al.  Dual Estimation and the Unscented Transformation , 1999, NIPS.

[6]  J. Berger Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis , 1988 .

[7]  Kristine L. Bell,et al.  A Tutorial on Particle Filters for Online Nonlinear/NonGaussian Bayesian Tracking , 2007 .

[8]  Hu Shou-song Nonlinear time series fault prediction based on clustering and support vector machines , 2007 .

[9]  Xin-Liang Zhang,et al.  Neural Network Model for the Dynamic Hysteresis Based on the Expanded Input Space: Neural Network Model for the Dynamic Hysteresis Based on the Expanded Input Space , 2009 .

[10]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Machine Condition Prediction Based on Adaptive Neuro–Fuzzy and High-Order Particle Filtering , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[11]  Donghua Zhou,et al.  Real-time Reliability Prediction for a Dynamic System Based on the Hidden Degradation Process Identification , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[12]  George Vachtsevanos,et al.  A Particle Filtering Framework for Failure Prognosis , 2005 .

[13]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Least Squares Support Vector Machines , 2002 .

[14]  Enrico Zio,et al.  Particle filtering prognostic estimation of the remaining useful life of nonlinear components , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  M Z Chen,et al.  PARTICLE FILTERING BASED FAULT PREDICTION OF NONLINEAR SYSTEMS , .

[16]  Bin Zhang,et al.  A Multi-Fault Modeling Approach for Fault Diagnosis and Failure Prognosis of Engineer ing Systems , 2009 .

[17]  Johan A. K. Suykens,et al.  Least Squares Support Vector Machines , 2002 .

[18]  Bhaskar Saha,et al.  Prognostics Methods for Battery Health Monitoring Using a Bayesian Framework , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.