Effects of the 3D Geometry Reconstruction on the Estimation of 3D Porous Scaffold Permeability*

3D scaffolds for tissue engineering typically need to adopt a dynamic culture to foster cell distribution and survival throughout the scaffold. It is, therefore, crucial to know fluids' behavior inside the scaffold architecture, especially for complex porous ones. Here we report a comparison between simulated and measured permeability of a porous 3D scaffold, focusing on different modeling parameters. The scaffold features were extracted by microcomputed tomography (µCT) and representative volume elements were used for the computational fluid-dynamic analyses. The objective was to investigate the sensitivity of the model to the degree of detail of the µCT image and the elements of the mesh. These findings highlight the pros and cons of the modeling strategy adopted and the importance of such parameters in analyzing fluid behavior in 3D scaffolds.

[1]  S. Hofmann,et al.  A multiscale computational fluid dynamics approach to simulate the micro-fluidic environment within a tissue engineering scaffold with highly irregular pore geometry , 2019, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[2]  Sandra J Shefelbine,et al.  BoneJ: Free and extensible bone image analysis in ImageJ. , 2010, Bone.

[3]  Ivan Martin,et al.  The influence of the scaffold design on the distribution of adhering cells after perfusion cell seeding. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[4]  J. Schrooten,et al.  Spatial optimization in perfusion bioreactors improves bone tissue‐engineered construct quality attributes , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  Sundararajan V Madihally,et al.  Cell colonization in degradable 3D porous matrices , 2008, Cell adhesion & migration.

[6]  N. Otsu.  A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[7]  Davar Ali,et al.  Finite element analysis of mechanical behavior, permeability and fluid induced wall shear stress of high porosity scaffolds with gyroid and lattice-based architectures. , 2017, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[8]  I. Gerges,et al.  Exploring the potential of polyurethane-based soft foam as cell-free scaffold for soft tissue regeneration. , 2018, Acta biomaterialia.

[9]  S. Blanquer,et al.  Permeability and fluid flow-induced wall shear stress in bone scaffolds with TPMS and lattice architectures: A CFD analysis , 2020, European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids.

[10]  M. Malvè,et al.  Computational Methodology to Determine Fluid Related Parameters of Non Regular Three-Dimensional Scaffolds , 2013, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  A. Al-Munajjed,et al.  Influence of pore size on tensile strength, permeability and porosity of hyaluronan-collagen scaffolds , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[12]  M Browne,et al.  A prediction of cell differentiation and proliferation within a collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold subjected to mechanical strain and perfusive fluid flow. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Paolo Cignoni,et al.  MeshLab: an Open-Source Mesh Processing Tool , 2008, Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference.

[14]  H Van Oosterwyck,et al.  Prediction of permeability of regular scaffolds for skeletal tissue engineering: a combined computational and experimental study. , 2012, Acta biomaterialia.

[15]  M. D. Vlad,et al.  Design and properties of 3D scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[16]  Aldo R Boccaccini,et al.  Permeability evaluation of 45S5 Bioglass-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Wei Li,et al.  A permeability measurement system for tissue engineering scaffolds , 2006 .

[18]  D Lacroix,et al.  A finite element study of mechanical stimuli in scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  D J Mooney,et al.  Optimizing seeding and culture methods to engineer smooth muscle tissue on biodegradable polymer matrices. , 1998, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  T. Clyne,et al.  Cell structure, stiffness and permeability of freeze-dried collagen scaffolds in dry and hydrated states. , 2016, Acta biomaterialia.

[21]  Joo L. Ong,et al.  Diffusion in Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Design Issues Related to Porosity, Permeability, Architecture, and Nutrient Mixing , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[22]  C. Jungreuthmayer,et al.  Deformation simulation of cells seeded on a collagen-GAG scaffold in a flow perfusion bioreactor using a sequential 3D CFD-elastostatics model. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  I. Gerges,et al.  Combined Effects of Electrical Stimulation and Protein Coatings on Myotube Formation in a Soft Porous Scaffold , 2019, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  J. Davies,et al.  Engineering three-dimensional bone tissue in vitro using biodegradable scaffolds: investigating initial cell-seeding density and culture period. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[25]  Cheng Yan,et al.  Polyurethane (PU) scaffolds prepared by solvent casting/particulate leaching (SCPL) combined with centrifugation , 2010 .

[26]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.