Should Waste Separation Be Mandatory? A Study on Public’s Response to the Policies in China

The implementation of effective waste separation policy is an important pathway to guide the public to actively participate in the waste separation action. This study focused on exploring the Chinese public’s response to the rigid and flexible waste separation policies from the perspectives of understanding, willingness to support, and willingness to implement. We used a big data mining technique to obtain 10,057 entries of the Chinese public’s response to the mandatory waste separation policy. The results showed that “public’s understanding–support willingness-implement willingness” regarding mandatory waste separation policy was characterized by a U-shaped response. Specifically, the public’s understanding and willingness to implement the rigid waste separation policy were relatively high in the short term, but their willingness to support this policy was relatively low and became increasingly low over time. Particularly, “troublesome” implementation was deemed to the main reason for the public’s low willingness to support the rigid waste separation policy. In addition, we further obtained the sample data of the Chinese public regarding the flexible waste separation policy through the situational survey. Contrary to the response characteristics of mandatory waste separation policy, the results showed that “public’s understanding-support willingness-implement willingness” regarding flexible waste separation policy was characterized by an inverted U-shaped response, and the Chinese public showed more positive sentiment regarding the willingness to support and implement. The results have important implications for guiding the public to actively participate in the waste separation action.

[1]  Lukumon O. Oyedele,et al.  Benchmarks for energy access: Policy vagueness and incoherence as barriers to sustainable electrification of the global south , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[2]  KimGang-Hoon,et al.  Big-data applications in the government sector , 2014 .

[3]  Xiang Zhang,et al.  Is subsidized electric vehicles adoption sustainable: Consumers’ perceptions and motivation toward incentive policies, environmental benefits, and risks , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[4]  S. Breckler.  Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  V. Li,et al.  Stakeholder concerns of air pollution in Hong Kong and policy implications: A big-data computational text analysis approach , 2019, Environmental Science & Policy.

[6]  A. M. Basu,et al.  Participation in solid waste management: Lessons from the Advanced Locality Management (ALM) programme of Mumbai , 2020 .

[7]  P. Bi,et al.  Perception, Attitude and Behavior in Relation to Climate Change: a Survey among CDC Health Professionals in Shanxi Province, China , 2014 .

[8]  Arezu Shafiei,et al.  Pro-environmental behavior of university students: Application of protection motivation theory , 2020 .

[9]  N. Potrafke,et al.  Compulsory voting and political participation: Empirical evidence from Austria , 2020, Regional Science and Urban Economics.

[10]  Robert N. Stavins,et al.  Crafting the Next Generation of Market-Based Environmental Tools , 1997 .

[11]  Christopher M. Danforth,et al.  Twitter reciprocal reply networks exhibit assortativity with respect to happiness , 2011, J. Comput. Sci..

[12]  S. Cooke,et al.  Environmental studies and environmental science today: inevitable mission creep and integration in action-oriented transdisciplinary areas of inquiry, training and practice , 2015, Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences.

[13]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  An Integrated Model of Waste Management Behavior , 1995 .

[14]  A. Clarke,et al.  Governments and Citizens Getting to Know Each Other? Open, Closed, and Big Data in Public Management Reform , 2014 .

[15]  Martin Binder,et al.  Environmental concerns, volunteering and subjective well-being: Antecedents and outcomes of environmental activism in Germany , 2016 .

[16]  Toshi H. Arimura,et al.  Political Economy of Voluntary Approaches: A Lesson from Environmental Policies in Japan , 2016 .

[17]  Jinhe Zhang,et al.  The influence of environmental background on tourists' environmentally responsible behaviour. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  David Popp,et al.  Energy, the Environment, and Technological Change , 2009 .

[19]  Kun Zhang,et al.  The door-to-door recycling scheme of household solid wastes in urban areas: a case study from Nagoya, Japan , 2017 .

[20]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  A Brief Inventory of Values , 1998 .

[21]  Malin Song,et al.  How would big data support societal development and environmental sustainability? Insights and practices , 2017 .

[22]  Johan Jansson,et al.  Public responses to an environmental transport policy in Sweden: Differentiating between acceptance and support for conventional and alternative fuel vehicles , 2019, Energy Research & Social Science.

[23]  Yue‐Jun Zhang,et al.  Direct energy rebound effect for road passenger transport in China: A dynamic panel quantile regression approach , 2015 .

[24]  Guangqing Huang,et al.  Residents’ Waste Separation Behaviors at the Source: Using SEM with the Theory of Planned Behavior in Guangzhou, China , 2015, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[25]  Feiyu Chen,et al.  Individual Preference Framework or Group Preference Framework? Which Will Regulate the Impact Path of Product Facilities on Residents’ Waste-Sorting Behavior Better , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[26]  Agusti Solanas,et al.  E-Government Interoperability: Linking Open and Smart Government , 2014, Computer.

[27]  Silvana Trimi,et al.  Big-data applications in the government sector , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[28]  S. Schwartz.  Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values , 1994 .

[29]  Qiyong Liu,et al.  Perception, attitude and behavior in relation to climate change: a survey among CDC health professionals in Shanxi province, China. , 2014, Environmental research.

[30]  Jing Feng-jie.  Model Research on Urban Residents’ Low-carbon Purchasing Behavior Base on the Survey Data in Five Cities , 2012 .

[31]  Baolong Yuan,et al.  Flexible environmental policy, technological innovation and sustainable development of China’s industry: The moderating effect of environment regulatory enforcement , 2020 .

[32]  Rui Fan,et al.  An agent-based model for emotion contagion and competition in online social media , 2017, ArXiv.

[33]  S. O'Neill,et al.  Public engagement with carbon and climate change: To what extent is the public ‘carbon capable’? , 2011 .

[34]  K. Shadan,et al.  Available online: , 2012 .

[35]  Hong Chen,et al.  Urban residents' response to and evaluation of low-carbon travel policies: Evidence from a survey of five eastern cities in China. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[36]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[37]  Hilary A. Sigman,et al.  The Cost of Reducing Municipal Solid Waste , 1997 .

[38]  J. Manyika,et al.  Are you ready for the era of ‘big data’? , 2010 .

[39]  Vincent Miller.  New Media, Networking and Phatic Culture , 2008 .

[40]  A. Vedlitz,et al.  Public Attitudes Toward Water Management and Drought in the United States , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[41]  Daoyan Guo,et al.  How to achieve a cooperative mechanism of MSW source separation among individuals — An analysis based on evolutionary game theory , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.