Knowledge transfer in virtual settings: the role of individual virtual competency

Economic forces, competitive pressures and technological advances have created an environment within which firms have developed new ways of organizing (e.g. virtual work settings) and managing their resources (e.g. knowledge management) in order to maintain and improve firm performance. Extant research has highlighted the challenges associated with managing knowledge in virtual settings. However, researchers are still struggling to provide effective guidance to practitioners in this field. We believe that a better understanding of individual virtual competency is a potential avenue for managing the complexity of knowledge transfer in virtual settings. In particular, we suggest that optimal knowledge transfers can be achieved by individuals armed with the right personal capabilities and skills for virtual work, particularly when those knowledge transfers are emergent, bottom‐up and cannot be specified a priori. The virtual competency exhibited by individuals can be the key to overcoming the constraints of knowledge transfers with such characteristics because underlying competency can facilitate effective action in unfamiliar and novel situations. In this conceptual research, we develop a theoretical model of individual virtual competence and describe its role in the communication process, which underpins effective knowledge transfer in virtual settings. Additionally, we consider the antecedent role that prior experience in virtual activity plays in aiding workers to develop virtual competence, which in turn engenders effective knowledge transfer. We conclude with implications for future research and for practicing managers.

[1]  Syed Shariq,et al.  How does knowledge transform as it is transferred? Speculations on the possibility of a cognitive theory of knowledgescapes , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[2]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The Effect of Communication Frequency and Channel Richness on the Convergence Between Chief Executive and Chief Information Officers , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[4]  Laku Chidambaram,et al.  Our Virtual World: The Transformation of Work, Play and Life via Technology , 2000 .

[5]  Jane S. Webster,et al.  Rational and social theories as complementary explanations of communication media choices: two polic , 1995 .

[6]  Malcolm R. Parks Making Friends in Cyberspace , 1996, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[7]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  A Sender-Receiver Framework for Knowledge Transfer , 2005, MIS Q..

[8]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[9]  C. Marlene Fiol,et al.  Identification in Face-to-Face, Hybrid, and Pure Virtual Teams: Untangling the Contradictions , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[10]  C. Higgins,et al.  A Self-Efficacy Theory Explanation for the Management of Remote Workers in Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[11]  J. Brown,et al.  Knowledge and Organization: A Social-Practice Perspective , 2001 .

[12]  Ned Kock,et al.  The Psychobiological Model: Towards a New Theory of Computer-Mediated Communication Based on Darwinian Evolution , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[13]  Michele Gorgoglione,et al.  Managing knowledge transfer by knowledge technologies , 2002 .

[14]  Manju K. Ahuja,et al.  Socialization in Virtual Groups , 2003 .

[15]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[16]  Mei Lu,et al.  How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[17]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[18]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Influence of Business Managers' IT Competence on Championing IT , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Business Competence of Information Technology Professionals: Conceptual Development and Influence on IT-Business Partnerships , 2004, MIS Q..

[20]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Using an adapted grounded theory approach for inductive theory building about virtual team development , 2000, DATB.

[21]  Jörgen Hansson,et al.  Virtual organizations and beyond - discover imaginary systems , 2001, Wiley series in practical strategy.

[22]  Gabriel Szulanski UNPACKING STICKINESS: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE BARRIERS TO TRANSFER BEST PRACTICE INSIDE THE FIRM. , 1995 .

[23]  Mark A. Fuller,et al.  Efficacy in Technology-Mediated Distributed Teams , 2006, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  L. Argote Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[25]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The driving forces in the virtual society , 1999, CACM.

[26]  Yuhyung Shin,et al.  A Person-Environment Fit Model for Virtual Organizations , 2004 .

[27]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Unraveling the Temporal Fabric of Knowledge Conversion: A Model of Media Selection and Use , 2006, MIS Q..

[28]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Relationship formation on the Internet: What's the big attraction? , 2002 .

[29]  Lyle M. Spencer,et al.  Competence at Work: Models for Superior Performance , 1993 .

[30]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Intraorganizational Networks : Effects of Network Position and Absorptive Capacity on Business Unit Innovation and Performance , 2007 .

[31]  Malcolm Munro,et al.  Understanding and measuring user competence , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[32]  Gabriel Szulanski The Process of Knowledge Transfer: A Diachronic Analysis of Stickiness , 2000 .

[33]  Lucy Gilson,et al.  Virtual Teams: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go From Here? , 2004 .

[34]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Role-Based Experiences, Media Perceptions, and Knowledge Transfer Success in Virtual Dyads , 2006 .

[35]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[36]  Louis Raymond,et al.  Impact of task uncertainty, end-user involvement, and competence on the success of end-user computing , 1998, Inf. Manag..

[37]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[38]  E. Salas,et al.  Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. , 1993 .

[39]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Processes for Virtual Organizations , 1999 .

[40]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  Knowledge transfer in virtual systems development teams: an exploratory study of four key enablers , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[41]  Dimitrina S. Dimitrova,et al.  Computer Networks as Social Networks: Collaborative Work, Telework, and Virtual Community , 1996 .

[42]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  An Investigation of Partner Similarity Dimensions on Knowledge Transfer , 2000 .

[43]  Patricia M. Fandt,et al.  Management: Challenges in the 21st Century , 1995 .

[44]  Benson Rosen,et al.  Virtual team effectiveness: a proposed research agenda , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[45]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Learning - by - Hiring: When Is Mobility More Likely to Facilitate Interfirm Knowledge Transfer? , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[46]  Ann Majchrzak,et al.  Enabling knowledge creation in far-flung teams: Best practices for IT support and knowledge sharing , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[47]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[48]  Ned Kock,et al.  Team adaptation to electronic communication media: evidence of compensatory adaptation in new product development teams , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[49]  A. Hughes Oxford English Dictionary. , 2008, Isis; an international review devoted to the history of science and its cultural influences.

[50]  Ojelanki K. Ngwenyama,et al.  Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning , 1997, MIS Q..

[51]  David J. Pauleen,et al.  Relationship building and the use of ICT in boundary-crossing virtual teams: a facilitator's perspective , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..

[52]  Jeffrey Stamps,et al.  Virtual teams: The new way to work , 1999 .

[53]  The rational and the social , 1989 .

[54]  Ian E. Wilson,et al.  The challenge of virtual organisation: critical success factors in dealing with constant change , 2004 .

[55]  Jim Suchan,et al.  The communication characteristics of virtual teams: a case study , 2001 .

[56]  Beth H. Jones,et al.  Impact of Communication Medium and Computer Support on Group Perceptions and Performance: A Comparison of Face-to-Face and Dispersed Meetings , 1993, MIS Q..

[57]  Kai R. T. Larsen,et al.  Preparing to work in the virtual organization , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[58]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[59]  John E. Sawyer,et al.  Virtualness and Knowledge in Teams: Managing the Love Triangle of Organizations, Individuals, and Information Technology , 2003, MIS Q..

[60]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[61]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Global software development: Exploring socialization and face-to-face meetings in distributed strategic projects , 2007, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[62]  W. D. Gray,et al.  Transfer of Cognitive Skills , 1987 .

[63]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[64]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[65]  David L. Paul,et al.  A Field of Study of the Effect of Interpersonal Trust on Virtual Collaborative Relationship Performance , 2004, MIS Q..

[66]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Information Technology Competence of Business Managers: A Definition and Research Model , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[67]  William R. King,et al.  Antecedents of Knowledge Transfer from Consultants to Clients in Enterprise System Implementations , 2005, MIS Q..

[68]  Rikard Lindgren,et al.  Design Principles for Competence Management Systems: A Synthesis of an Action Research Study , 2004, MIS Q..

[69]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Training to improve virtual team communication , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[70]  Daniel Robey,et al.  Situated learning in cross-functional virtual teams , 2000 .

[71]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[72]  Allen S. Lee Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation , 1994, MIS Q..

[73]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[74]  Robert M. Grant,et al.  Knowledge and Organization , 2001 .

[75]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[76]  D. Sandy Staples,et al.  A Self-Efficacy Theory Explanation for the Management of Remote Workers in Virtual Organizations , 1999, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[77]  C. Cramton The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[78]  Gloria Mark,et al.  Meeting Current Challenges for Virtually Collocated Teams: Participation, Culture and Integration , 2001 .

[79]  Malcolm Munro,et al.  Assessing User Competence: Conceptualization and Measurement , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[80]  John R. Carlson,et al.  Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions , 1999 .

[81]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Transfer of Cognitive Skill , 1989 .

[82]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  Information sharing as enabler for the virtual team: an experimental approach to assessing the role of electronic mail in disintermediation , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[83]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[84]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[85]  Jennifer L. Gibbs,et al.  Unpacking the Concept of Virtuality: The Effects of , 2022 .

[86]  Niki Panteli,et al.  Trust and temporary virtual teams: alternative explanations and dramaturgical relationships , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[87]  J. Levine,et al.  Knowledge Transfer in Organizations: Learning from the Experience of Others☆ , 2000 .

[88]  Paul J. Jackson,et al.  Organizational change and virtual teams: strategic and operational integration , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[89]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[90]  Jörgen Sandberg Understanding Human Competence at Work: An Interpretative Approach , 2000 .

[91]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .