Rethinking hyporheic flow and transient storage to advance understanding of stream‐catchment connections

[1] Although surface water and groundwater are increasingly referred to as one resource, there remain environmental and ecosystem needs to study the 10 m to 1 km reach scale as one hydrologic system. Streams gain and lose water over a range of spatial and temporal scales. Large spatial scales (kilometers) have traditionally been recognized and studied as river-aquifer connections. Over the last 25 years hyporheic exchange flows (1–10 m) have been studied extensively. Often a transient storage model has been used to quantify the physical solute transport setting in which biogeochemical processes occur. At the longer 10 m to 1 km scale of stream reaches it is now clear that streams which gain water overall can coincidentally lose water to the subsurface. At this scale, the amounts of water transferred are not necessarily significant but the exchanges can, however, influence solute transport. The interpretation of seemingly straightforward questions about water, contaminant, and nutrient fluxes into and along a stream can be confounded by flow losses which are too small to be apparent in stream gauging and along flow paths too long to be detected in tracer experiments. We suggest basic hydrologic approaches, e.g., measurement of flow along the channel, surface and subsurface solute sampling, and routine measurements of the water table that, in our opinion, can be used to extend simple exchange concepts from the hyporheic exchange scale to a scale of stream-catchment connection.

[1]  Andrea Bottacin-Busolin,et al.  Solute transport in rivers with multiple storage zones: The STIR model , 2008 .

[2]  R. J. Avanzino,et al.  COMPARISON OF TRACER-DILUTION AND CURRENT-METER DISCHARGE MEASUREMENTS IN A SMALL GRAVEL-BED STREAM, LITTLE LOST MAN CREEK, CALIFORNIA , 1989 .

[3]  K. Singha,et al.  Imaging hyporheic zone solute transport using electrical resistivity , 2009 .

[4]  Roy Haggerty,et al.  Power‐law residence time distribution in the hyporheic zone of a 2nd‐order mountain stream , 2002 .

[5]  E. Hester,et al.  Moving beyond the banks: hyporheic restoration is fundamental to restoring ecological services and functions of streams. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Katherine Walton-Day,et al.  Assessment of metal loads in watersheds affected by acid mine drainage by using tracer injection and synoptic sampling: Cement Creek, colorado, USA , 2002 .

[7]  C. Hopkinson,et al.  Surface and hyporheic transient storage dynamics throughout a coastal stream network , 2010 .

[8]  K. Bencala,et al.  The Effect of streambed topography on surface‐subsurface water exchange in mountain catchments , 1993 .

[9]  K. Bencala A Perspective on Stream-Catchment Connections , 1993, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[10]  J. Stanford,et al.  Ecology and management of the hyporheic zone: stream–groundwater interactions of running waters and their floodplains , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[11]  Aaron I. Packman,et al.  Effect of flow‐induced exchange in hyporheic zones on longitudinal transport of solutes in streams and rivers , 2002 .

[12]  Kamini Singha,et al.  Characterizing hyporheic transport processes — Interpretation of electrical geophysical data in coupled stream–hyporheic zone systems during solute tracer studies , 2010 .

[13]  D. B. Simons,et al.  Hydraulics of mountain rivers , 2007 .

[14]  Geoffrey C. Poole,et al.  Stream hydrogeomorphology as a physical science basis for advances in stream ecology , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[15]  Michael N. Gooseff,et al.  Comparing transient storage modeling and residence time distribution (RTD) analysis in geomorphically varied reaches in the Lookout Creek basin, Oregon, USA , 2003 .

[16]  T. C. Winter,et al.  Ground Water and Surface Water: A Single Resource , 1999 .

[17]  S. Wondzell Effect of morphology and discharge on hyporheic exchange flows in two small streams in the Cascade Mountains of Oregon, USA , 2006 .

[18]  W. Woessner Stream and Fluvial Plain Ground Water Interactions: Rescaling Hydrogeologic Thought , 2000 .

[19]  James E. Saiers,et al.  Solute transport and storage mechanisms in wetlands of the Everglades, south Florida , 2005 .

[20]  J. Harvey,et al.  Characterizing multiple timescales of stream and storage zone interaction that affect solute fate and transport in streams , 2000 .

[21]  Christopher D. Arp,et al.  A method for estimating surface transient storage parameters for streams with concurrent hyporheic storage , 2009 .

[22]  Robert L. Runkel,et al.  One-Dimensional Transport with Inflow and Storage (OTIS): A Solute Transport Model for Streams and Rivers , 1998 .

[23]  Michael N. Gooseff,et al.  Channel water balance and exchange with subsurface flow along a mountain headwater stream in Montana, United States , 2009 .

[24]  P. Mulholland,et al.  Nutrient dynamics in streams and the role of J-NABS , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[25]  Michael N. Gooseff,et al.  Hydrologic connectivity between landscapes and streams: Transferring reach‐ and plot‐scale understanding to the catchment scale , 2009 .