Mosaic results after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy may be accompanied by changes in global gene expression

Aneuploidy in preimplantation embryos is a major cause of human reproductive failure. Unlike uniformly aneuploid embryos, embryos diagnosed as diploid-aneuploid mosaics after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) can develop into healthy infants. However, the reason why these embryos achieve full reproductive competence needs further research. Current RNA sequencing techniques allow for the investigation of the human preimplantation transcriptome, providing new insights into the molecular mechanisms of embryo development. In this prospective study, using euploid embryo gene expression as a control, we compared the transcriptome profiles of inner cell mass and trophectoderm samples from blastocysts with different levels of chromosomal mosaicism. A total of 25 samples were analyzed from 14 blastocysts with previous PGT-A diagnosis, including five low-level mosaic embryos and four high-level mosaic embryos. Global gene expression profiles visualized in cluster heatmaps were correlated with the original PGT-A diagnosis. In addition, gene expression distance based on the number of differentially expressed genes increased with the mosaic level, compared to euploid controls. Pathways involving apoptosis, mitosis, protein degradation, metabolism, and mitochondrial energy production were among the most deregulated within mosaic embryos. Retrospective analysis of the duration of blastomere cell cycles in mosaic embryos revealed several mitotic delays compared to euploid controls, providing additional evidence of the mosaic status. Overall, these findings suggest that embryos with mosaic results are not simply a misdiagnosis by-product, but may also have a genuine molecular identity that is compatible with their reproductive potential.

[1]  F. Spinella,et al.  Two clinical case reports of embryonic mosaicism identified with PGT-A persisting during pregnancy as true fetal mosaicism. , 2023, Human reproduction.

[2]  A. Capalbo,et al.  On the reproductive capabilities of aneuploid human preimplantation embryos. , 2022, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  E. Strong,et al.  Mosaic embryo transfer—first report of a live born with nonmosaic partial aneuploidy and uniparental disomy 15 , 2022, F&S reports.

[4]  Y. Niida,et al.  A comparison of mRNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) library preparation methods for transcriptome analysis , 2022, BMC Genomics.

[5]  K. Sermon,et al.  On the origins and fate of chromosomal abnormalities in human preimplantation embryos: an unsolved riddle. , 2022, Molecular human reproduction.

[6]  QingYun Mai,et al.  Which type of chromosomal mosaicism is compatible for embryo transfer: a systematical review and meta-analysis , 2022, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[7]  A. Heguy,et al.  Investigation of Global Gene Expression of Human Blastocysts Diagnosed as Mosaic using Next-generation Sequencing , 2022, Reproductive Sciences.

[8]  C. Rubio,et al.  PGDIS position statement on the transfer of mosaic embryos 2021. , 2022, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[9]  S. D. du Plessis,et al.  Using publicly available transcriptomic data to identify mechanistic and diagnostic biomarkers in azoospermia and overall male infertility , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[10]  M. Hachim,et al.  Using publicly available transcriptomic data to identify mechanistic and diagnostic biomarkers in azoospermia and overall male infertility , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Lipeng Chen,et al.  Endogenous hydrogen sulfide promotes human preimplantation embryonic development by regulating metabolism-related gene expression. , 2022, Nitric oxide : biology and chemistry.

[12]  J. Vermeesch,et al.  ESHRE survey results and good practice recommendations on managing chromosomal mosaicism , 2022, Human reproduction open.

[13]  Y. Niida,et al.  A comparison of mRNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) library preparation methods for transcriptome analysis , 2021, BMC genomics.

[14]  C. Rubio,et al.  Mosaic human preimplantation embryos and their developmental potential in a prospective, non-selection clinical trial , 2021, American journal of human genetics.

[15]  D. Cram,et al.  IVF embryo choices and pregnancy outcomes , 2021, Prenatal diagnosis.

[16]  F. Bissonnette,et al.  Evidence-based clinical prioritization of embryos with mosaic results: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[17]  Tong Chen,et al.  EVenn: Easy to create repeatable and editable Venn diagrams and Venn networks online. , 2021, Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao.

[18]  N. Treff,et al.  The "mosaic" embryo: misconceptions and misinterpretations in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. , 2021, Fertility and sterility.

[19]  G. Coticchio,et al.  Plasticity of the human preimplantation embryo: developmental dogmas, variations on themes and self-correction. , 2021, Human reproduction update.

[20]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Integrated pseudotime analysis of human pre-implantation embryo single-cell transcriptomes reveals the dynamics of lineage specification. , 2021, Cell stem cell.

[21]  J. Kawwass,et al.  Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes after Transfer of Mosaic Embryos: A Review , 2021, Journal of clinical medicine.

[22]  A. Mercader,et al.  The morphokinetic signature of mosaic embryos: evidence in support of their own genetic identity. , 2021, Fertility and sterility.

[23]  N. Treff,et al.  Isn’t it time to stop calling preimplantation embryos “mosaic”? , 2020, F&S reports.

[24]  K. Niakan,et al.  Initiation of a conserved trophectoderm program in human, cow and mouse embryos , 2020, Nature.

[25]  N. Treff,et al.  Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: A review of published blastocyst reanalysis concordance data , 2020, Prenatal diagnosis.

[26]  G. Patounakis,et al.  A multicenter, prospective, blinded, nonselection study evaluating the predictive value of an aneuploid diagnosis using a targeted next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy assay and impact of biopsy. , 2020, Fertility and sterility.

[27]  N. Baker Emerging mechanisms of cell competition , 2020, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[28]  M. Zernicka-Goetz,et al.  Developmental potential of aneuploid human embryos cultured beyond implantation , 2020, Nature Communications.

[29]  R. Navarro,et al.  Optimized NGS Approach for Detection of Aneuploidies and Mosaicism in PGT-A and Imbalances in PGT-SR , 2020, Genes.

[30]  M. Zernicka-Goetz,et al.  Autophagy-mediated apoptosis eliminates aneuploid cells in a mouse model of chromosome mosaicism , 2020, Nature Communications.

[31]  Joachim Goedhart,et al.  VolcaNoseR is a web app for creating, exploring, labeling and sharing volcano plots , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[32]  B. Menten,et al.  Chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts: the ultimate diagnostic dilemma. , 2020, Human reproduction update.

[33]  S. Kahraman,et al.  The birth of a baby with mosaicism resulting from a known mosaic embryo transfer: a case report , 2020, Human reproduction.

[34]  K. Kato,et al.  Trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic test and technical tips: A review , 2020, Reproductive medicine and biology.

[35]  Rajiv C. McCoy,et al.  Single-cell analysis of human embryos reveals diverse patterns of aneuploidy and mosaicism , 2020, bioRxiv.

[36]  M. Francois,et al.  Uterine SOX17: a key player in human endometrial receptivity and embryo implantation , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[37]  J. Rinn,et al.  RNA-seq as a tool for evaluating human embryo competence , 2019, Genome research.

[38]  M. Tzetis,et al.  Can trophectoderm RNA analysis predict human blastocyst competency? , 2019, Systems biology in reproductive medicine.

[39]  A. Mercader,et al.  Transcriptomic behavior of genes associated with chromosome 21 aneuploidies in early embryo development. , 2019, Fertility and sterility.

[40]  M. Meseguer,et al.  Novel noninvasive embryo selection algorithm combining time-lapse morphokinetics and oxidative status of the spent embryo culture medium. , 2019, Fertility and sterility.

[41]  D. Griffin,et al.  One hundred mosaic embryos transferred prospectively in a single clinic: exploring when and why they result in healthy pregnancies. , 2019, Fertility and sterility.

[42]  M. Romans Altered , 2019 .

[43]  Z. Storchová,et al.  The diverse consequences of aneuploidy , 2019, Nature Cell Biology.

[44]  J. Nichols,et al.  Single cell transcriptome analysis of human, marmoset and mouse embryos reveals common and divergent features of preimplantation development , 2018, Development.

[45]  A. Heguy,et al.  Human blastocysts of normal and abnormal karyotypes display distinct transcriptome profiles , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[46]  J. Remohi,et al.  Conventional versus minimal ovarian stimulation: an intra-patient comparison of ovarian response in poor-responder women according to Bologna Criteria. , 2018, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[47]  J. Lee,et al.  Single-cell RNA sequencing technologies and bioinformatics pipelines , 2018, Experimental & Molecular Medicine.

[48]  Peter J Park,et al.  Linking transcriptional and genetic tumor heterogeneity through allele analysis of single-cell RNA-seq data , 2018, Genome research.

[49]  A. Conti,et al.  Mitochondrial dysfunction in down syndrome: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets , 2018, Molecular medicine.

[50]  M. Gordon,et al.  Cellular Stress Associated with Aneuploidy. , 2018, Developmental cell.

[51]  Ge Guo,et al.  Integrated analysis of single-cell embryo data yields a unified transcriptome signature for the human pre-implantation epiblast , 2017, Development.

[52]  J. Marioni,et al.  Mosaic autosomal aneuploidies are detectable from single-cell RNAseq data , 2017, BMC Genomics.

[53]  R. McCoy Mosaicism in Preimplantation Human Embryos: When Chromosomal Abnormalities Are the Norm. , 2017, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[54]  Geet Duggal,et al.  Salmon: fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression using dual-phase inference , 2017, Nature Methods.

[55]  N. Benvenisty,et al.  Analysis of chromosomal aberrations and recombination by allelic bias in RNA-Seq , 2016, Nature Communications.

[56]  Alexey Sergushichev,et al.  An algorithm for fast preranked gene set enrichment analysis using cumulative statistic calculation , 2016 .

[57]  Alvaro Plaza Reyes,et al.  Single-Cell RNA-Seq Reveals Lineage and X Chromosome Dynamics in Human Preimplantation Embryos , 2016, Cell.

[58]  Parveen Kumar,et al.  Mouse model of chromosome mosaicism reveals lineage-specific depletion of aneuploid cells and normal developmental potential , 2016, Nature Communications.

[59]  J. M. Jensen,et al.  Distinct differences in global gene expression profiles in non-implanted blastocysts and blastocysts resulting in live birth. , 2015, Gene.

[60]  P. Robson,et al.  Defining the three cell lineages of the human blastocyst by single-cell RNA-seq , 2015, Development.

[61]  D. Petrov,et al.  Evidence of Selection against Complex Mitotic-Origin Aneuploidy during Preimplantation Development , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[62]  M. Meseguer,et al.  Morphokinetics as a predictor of self-correction to diploidy in tripronucleated intracytoplasmic sperm injection-derived human embryos. , 2015, Fertility and sterility.

[63]  C. Ponting,et al.  G&T-seq: parallel sequencing of single-cell genomes and transcriptomes , 2015, Nature Methods.

[64]  W. Huber,et al.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2 , 2014, Genome Biology.

[65]  D. Griffin,et al.  The origin, mechanisms, incidence and clinical consequences of chromosomal mosaicism in humans. , 2014, Human reproduction update.

[66]  Björn Usadel,et al.  Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data , 2014, Bioinform..

[67]  D. Keefe,et al.  Telomere Length Reprogramming in Embryos and Stem Cells , 2014, BioMed research international.

[68]  Åsa K. Björklund,et al.  Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2 , 2014, Nature Protocols.

[69]  Deanne M. Taylor,et al.  Uniparental disomy in the human blastocyst is exceedingly rare. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[70]  Jason M. Sheltzer,et al.  A transcriptional and metabolic signature of primary aneuploidy is present in chromosomally unstable cancer cells and informs clinical prognosis. , 2013, Cancer research.

[71]  Ruiqiang Li,et al.  Single-cell RNA-Seq profiling of human preimplantation embryos and embryonic stem cells , 2013, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[72]  S. Horvath,et al.  Genetic programs in human and mouse early embryos revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing , 2013, Nature.

[73]  S. Kimber,et al.  Global Gene Expression Profiling of Individual Human Oocytes and Embryos Demonstrates Heterogeneity in Early Development , 2013, PloS one.

[74]  R. Sandberg,et al.  Full-Length mRNA-Seq from single cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[75]  R. Kishi,et al.  Maternal folate, alcohol and energy metabolism-related gene polymorphisms and the risk of recurrent pregnancy loss , 2012, Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease.

[76]  Farshid Moussavi,et al.  Dynamic blastomere behaviour reflects human embryo ploidy by the four-cell stage , 2012, Nature Communications.

[77]  P. Walter,et al.  The Unfolded Protein Response: From Stress Pathway to Homeostatic Regulation , 2011, Science.

[78]  M. Blasco,et al.  Different telomere-length dynamics at the inner cell mass versus established embryonic stem (ES) cells , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[79]  S. Linnarsson,et al.  Characterization of the single-cell transcriptional landscape by highly multiplex RNA-seq. , 2011, Genome research.

[80]  H. Niemann,et al.  Species-Specific Telomere Length Differences Between Blastocyst Cell Compartments and Ectopic Telomere Extension in Early Bovine Embryos by Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase1 , 2011, Biology of reproduction.

[81]  A. Amon,et al.  Identification of Aneuploidy-Selective Antiproliferation Compounds , 2011, Cell.

[82]  J. Bilodeau,et al.  Altered placental glutathione peroxidase mRNA expression in preeclampsia according to the presence or absence of labor. , 2011, Placenta.

[83]  Catalin C. Barbacioru,et al.  mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell , 2009, Nature Methods.

[84]  S. Hatakeyama,et al.  TRIM36 interacts with the kinetochore protein CENP-H and delays cell cycle progression. , 2009, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[85]  G. Vajta,et al.  Vitrification of human mature oocytes in clinical practice. , 2009, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[86]  M. Kuwayama,et al.  Highly efficient vitrification for cryopreservation of human oocytes and embryos: the Cryotop method. , 2007, Theriogenology.

[87]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[88]  E. Dejana,et al.  Human cytotrophoblasts adopt a vascular phenotype as they differentiate. A strategy for successful endovascular invasion? , 1997, The Journal of clinical investigation.