Cutting Edge: Evidence for a Dynamically Driven T Cell Signaling Mechanism

T cells use the αβ TCR to bind peptides presented by MHC proteins (pMHC) on APCs. Formation of a TCR–pMHC complex initiates T cell signaling via a poorly understood process, potentially involving changes in oligomeric state, altered interactions with CD3 subunits, and mechanical stress. These mechanisms could be facilitated by binding-induced changes in the TCR, but the nature and extent of any such alterations are unclear. Using hydrogen/deuterium exchange, we demonstrate that ligation globally rigidifies the TCR, which via entropic and packing effects will promote associations with neighboring proteins and enhance the stability of existing complexes. TCR regions implicated in lateral associations and signaling are particularly affected. Computational modeling demonstrated a high degree of dynamic coupling between the TCR constant and variable domains that is dampened upon ligation. These results raise the possibility that TCR triggering could involve a dynamically driven, allosteric mechanism.

[1]  Mark M Davis,et al.  Disruption of extracellular interactions impairs T cell receptor-CD3 complex stability and signaling. , 2007, Immunity.

[2]  Brian M Baker,et al.  T cell receptor recognition via cooperative conformational plasticity. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  B M Baker,et al.  Four A6-TCR/peptide/HLA-A2 structures that generate very different T cell signals are nearly identical. , 1999, Immunity.

[4]  B. Baker,et al.  TCRs Used in Cancer Gene Therapy Cross-React with MART-1/Melan-A Tumor Antigens via Distinct Mechanisms , 2011, The Journal of Immunology.

[5]  A. Wand,et al.  Conformational entropy in molecular recognition by proteins , 2007, Nature.

[6]  Jun Zhang,et al.  DNA binding alters coactivator interaction surfaces of the intact VDR–RXR complex , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[7]  David M. Kranz,et al.  Solution mapping of T cell receptor docking footprints on peptide-MHC , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Ivet Bahar,et al.  Anisotropic network model: systematic evaluation and a new web interface , 2006, Bioinform..

[9]  Mark M. Davis,et al.  Evidence for a functional sidedness to the αβTCR , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  I. Bahar,et al.  Structural changes involved in protein binding correlate with intrinsic motions of proteins in the unbound state. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Dynamic allostery: linkers are not merely flexible. , 2011, Structure.

[12]  A. Ortiz,et al.  Cooperativity Between T Cell Receptor Complexes Revealed by Conformational Mutants of CD3ɛ , 2009, Science Signaling.

[13]  Sean L Seymour,et al.  The Paragon Algorithm, a Next Generation Search Engine That Uses Sequence Temperature Values and Feature Probabilities to Identify Peptides from Tandem Mass Spectra*S , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[14]  Lila M. Gierasch,et al.  Sending Signals Dynamically , 2009, Science.

[15]  Meir Glick,et al.  Stable, soluble T-cell receptor molecules for crystallization and therapeutics. , 2003, Protein engineering.

[16]  I. Bahar,et al.  Global dynamics of proteins: bridging between structure and function. , 2010, Annual review of biophysics.

[17]  B. Baker,et al.  Disparate degrees of hypervariable loop flexibility control T-cell receptor cross-reactivity, specificity, and binding mechanism. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Structure‐based design of a T‐cell receptor leads to nearly 100‐fold improvement in binding affinity for pepMHC , 2009, Proteins.

[19]  B. Evavold,et al.  Two-stage cooperative T cell receptor-peptide major histocompatibility complex-CD8 trimolecular interactions amplify antigen discrimination. , 2011, Immunity.

[20]  E. Reinherz,et al.  The αβ T Cell Receptor Is an Anisotropic Mechanosensor* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[21]  B. Balgley,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Tandem MS Search Algorithms Using a Target-Decoy Search Strategy*S , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[22]  Omer Dushek,et al.  Mechanisms for T cell receptor triggering , 2011, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[23]  R. Ebright,et al.  Dynamically driven protein allostery , 2006, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[24]  James McCluskey,et al.  Antigen ligation triggers a conformational change within the constant domain of the alphabeta T cell receptor. , 2009, Immunity.

[25]  Charalampos G. Kalodimos,et al.  Dynamic activation of an allosteric regulatory protein , 2009, Nature.

[26]  L Mayne,et al.  Mechanisms and uses of hydrogen exchange. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[27]  M. Nishimura,et al.  Structural basis for the recognition of mutant self by a tumor-specific, MHC class II–restricted T cell receptor , 2007, Nature Immunology.

[28]  D. Beckett,et al.  Allosteric signaling in the biotin repressor occurs via local folding coupled to global dampening of protein dynamics. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[29]  Brian M Baker,et al.  Two different T cell receptors use different thermodynamic strategies to recognize the same peptide/MHC ligand. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  E. Reinherz,et al.  Distinctive CD3 Heterodimeric Ectodomain Topologies Maximize Antigen-Triggered Activation of αβ T Cell Receptors , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.

[31]  J. R. Engen,et al.  Hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry: what is it and what can it tell us? , 2010, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[32]  D. Baker,et al.  A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein–protein complexes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.