Reliability of thermodilution derived cardiac output with different operator characteristics

Cardiac output (CO) is commonly measured using the thermodilution technique at the time of right heart catheterisation (RHC). However inter-operator variability, and the operator characteristics which may influence that, has not been quantified. Therefore, this study aimed to assess inter-operator variability with the thermodilution technique using a mock circulation loop (MCL) with calibrated flow sensors. Participants were blinded and asked to determine 4 levels of CO using the thermodilution technique, which was compared with the MCL calibrated flow sensors. The MCL was used to randomly generate CO between 3.0 and 7.0 L/min through changes in heart rate, contractility and vascular resistance with a RHC inserted through the MCL pulmonary artery. Participant characteristics including gender, specialty, age, height, weight, body-mass index, grip strength and RHC experience were recorded and compared to determine their relationship with CO measurement accuracy. In total, there were 15 participants, made up of consultant cardiologists (6), advanced trainees in cardiology (5) and intensive care consultants (4). The majority (9) had performed 26–100 previous RHCs, while 4 had performed more than 100 RHCs. Compared to the MCL-measured CO, participants overestimated CO using the thermodilution technique with a mean difference of +0.75 ± 0.71 L/min. The overall r2 value for actual vs measured CO was 0.85. The difference between MCL and thermodilution derived CO declined significantly with increasing RHC experience (P < 0.001), increasing body mass index (P < 0.001) and decreasing grip strength (P = 0.033). This study demonstrated that the thermodilution technique is a reasonable method to determine CO, and that operator experience was the only participant characteristic related to CO measurement accuracy. Our results suggest that adequate exposure to, and training in, the thermodilution technique is required for clinicians who perform RHC.

[1]  R. Normann,et al.  Signal processing strategies for enhancement of signal-to-noise ratio of thermodilution measurements , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Peter Baylor,et al.  Lack of Agreement Between Thermodilution and Fick Methods in the Measurement of Cardiac Output , 2006, Journal of intensive care medicine.

[3]  A. Maisel,et al.  Comparison between mixed venous oxygen saturation and thermodilution cardiac output in monitoring patients with severe heart failure treated with milrinone and dobutamine. , 1998, American heart journal.

[4]  L. Hillis,et al.  Underestimation of cardiac output by thermodilution in patients with tricuspid regurgitation. , 1989, The American journal of medicine.

[5]  R. Normann,et al.  Central venous blood temperature fluctuations and thermodilution signal processing in dogs , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  D. Scott,et al.  Pulmonary artery blood temperature and the measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution , 2002, Anaesthesia.

[7]  R. Riley,et al.  Comparison of the Fick and dye injection methods of measuring the cardiac output in man. , 1948, Federation proceedings.

[8]  Daniel L. Timms,et al.  Replication of the Frank-Starling response in a mock circulation loop , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  Daniel L. Timms,et al.  Simulation and enhancement of a cardiovascular device test rig , 2010, J. Simulation.

[10]  O. Thom,et al.  In vitro evaluation of an ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) device , 2016, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[11]  G. Fegler,et al.  MEASUREMENT OF CARDIAC OUTPUT IN ANÆSTHETIZED ANIMALS BY A THERMO‐DILUTION METHOD , 1954 .

[12]  Y. Nakamura,et al.  Comparison of thermodilution and Fick methods for measurement of cardiac output in tricuspid regurgitation. , 1992, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  L. Critchley,et al.  Journal of clinical monitoring and computing end of year summary 2018: hemodynamic monitoring and management , 2019, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[14]  M. Woo,et al.  Effect of tricuspid regurgitation on the reliability of the thermodilution cardiac output technique in congestive heart failure. , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[15]  G. Fegler.  The reliability of the thermodilution method for determination of the cardiac output and the blood flow in central veins. , 1957, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[16]  S. Green.  How Many Subjects Does It Take To Do A Regression Analysis. , 1991, Multivariate behavioral research.

[17]  Thermodilution cardiac output: comparison between automated and manual injection of indicator. , 1992, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[18]  G. Fegler,et al.  Measurement of cardiac output in anaesthetized animals by a thermodilution method. , 1954, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[19]  M. Zile,et al.  The effects of valvular regurgitation on thermodilution ejection fraction measurements. , 1992, Chest.

[20]  Ulrich Steinseifer,et al.  A compact mock circulation loop for the in vitro testing of cardiovascular devices. , 2010, Artificial organs.

[21]  J. Petre,et al.  Errors in thermodilution cardiac output measurements caused by rapid pulmonary artery temperature decreases after cardiopulmonary bypass. , 1992, Anesthesiology.

[22]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. , 1985, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  James S. Forrester,et al.  A new technique for measurement of cardiac output by thermodilution in man , 1971 .

[24]  G. Stewart,et al.  Researches on the Circulation Time and on the Influences which affect it , 1897, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  T. Similowski,et al.  Comparison of bedside measurement of cardiac output with the thermodilution method and the Fick method in mechanically ventilated patients , 2002, Critical care.