Interpretation of cell toxicity data for the estimation of potential irritation.

Three cytotoxicity assays were evaluated using 57 chemicals of various classes (inorganic and organic metal salts, solvents, detergents, reagents, drugs) which have widely different mechanisms of cytotoxicity. Baby hamster kidney fibroblasts (BHK-21/C13) and early (Keller) and late (MRC-5) passage human fibroblasts were used to measure cell detachment, cloning efficiency, and growth inhibition under subconfluent culture conditions. For the majority of chemicals, for which comparisons were made, the ranking order was roughly the same in all three tests and with all three cell types. However, for some chemicals specific growth effects could either be detected or excluded because the relationship between the data from the detachment assay and that from one of the growth assays was characteristically altered. The ranking order resulting from our in vitro data correlated better with threshold limit values for human workroom air (TLV/TWA) than with LD50 values (rat, oral). Correlations with data from Draize skin and eye irritation tests were not determined since the available in vivo values were derived using various different scoring systems. However, when our in vitro data were used to divide the chemicals into three crude classes, (i) non-irritant, (ii) mild to moderate irritant, or (iii) strong irritant or corrosive, and the results were compared with the known irritation potential for skin and mucous membranes derived from human exposure data, the in vitro data were more than 80% predictive of the in vivo classifications.

[1]  J. Bridges,et al.  MECHANISMS OF TOXIC INJURY , 1983, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  V Silano,et al.  Toxicology investigations with cell culture systems. , 1981, Toxicology.

[3]  E. Bosshard Review on skin and mucous-membrane irritation tests and their application. , 1985, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[4]  M. Scaife An in vitro cytotoxicity test to predict the ocular irritation potential of detergents and detergent products. , 1985, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[5]  G. Zbinden,et al.  Cell detachment and cloning efficiency as parameters for cytotoxicity. , 1982, Toxicology.

[6]  R. Kemp,et al.  Toxicity of commercial products on cells in suspension culture: a possible screen for the Draize eye irritation test. , 1985, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[7]  E. Borenfreund,et al.  A battery of potential alternatives to the Draize test: uridine uptake inhibition, morphological cytotoxicity, macrophage chemotaxis and exfoliative cytology. , 1985, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[8]  M. Gacula,et al.  Prediction of the eye irritation potential of shampoos using the in vitro SIRC cell toxicity test. , 1985, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.