Transcription factor clusters enable target search but do not contribute to target gene activation

Many transcription factors (TFs) localize in nuclear clusters of locally increased concentrations, but how TF clustering is regulated and how it influences gene expression is not well understood. Here, we use quantitative microscopy in living cells to study the regulation and function of clustering of the budding yeast TF Gal4 in its endogenous context. Our results show that Gal4 cluster formation is facilitated by, but does not completely depend on DNA binding and intrinsically disordered regions. Gal4 cluster properties are regulated by the Gal4-inhibitor Gal80 and Gal4 concentration. Moreover, we discover that clustering acts as a double-edged sword: self-interactions aid TF recruitment to target genes, but recruited Gal4 molecules that are not DNA-bound do not contribute to, and may even inhibit, transcription activation. We propose that cells need to balance the different effects of TF clustering on target search and transcription activation to facilitate proper gene expression.

[1]  Shasha Chong,et al.  Fixation can change the appearance of phase separation in living cells , 2022, bioRxiv.

[2]  R. Tjian,et al.  "Structure"-function relationships in eukaryotic transcription factors: The role of intrinsically disordered regions in gene regulation. , 2022, Molecular cell.

[3]  M. Staller.  Transcription factors perform a 2-step search of the nucleus. , 2022, Genetics.

[4]  R. Pappu,et al.  A conceptual framework for understanding phase separation and addressing open questions and challenges. , 2022, Molecular cell.

[5]  Yihan Lin,et al.  Modulating gene regulation function by chemically controlled transcription factor clustering , 2022, Nature Communications.

[6]  Guangchao Sui,et al.  A histidine cluster determines YY1-compartmentalized coactivators and chromatin elements in phase-separated enhancer clusters , 2022, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  T. Lenstra,et al.  Following the tracks: How transcription factor binding dynamics control transcription , 2022, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Xing-Ding Zhang,et al.  Formation of nuclear condensates by the Mediator complex subunit Med15 in mammalian cells , 2021, BMC Biology.

[9]  D. Pincus,et al.  Inducible transcriptional condensates drive 3D genome reorganization in the heat shock response , 2021, bioRxiv.

[10]  R. Tjian,et al.  Mechanisms governing target search and binding dynamics of hypoxia-inducible factors , 2021, bioRxiv.

[11]  R. Tjian,et al.  Tuning levels of low-complexity domain interactions to modulate endogenous oncogenic transcription , 2021, bioRxiv.

[12]  Z. Dosztányi,et al.  IUPred3: prediction of protein disorder enhanced with unambiguous experimental annotation and visualization of evolutionary conservation , 2021, Nucleic Acids Res..

[13]  D. Mazza,et al.  The needle and the haystack: single molecule tracking to probe the transcription factor search in eukaryotes , 2021, Biochemical Society transactions.

[14]  Yihan Lin,et al.  Co-condensation between transcription factor and coactivator p300 modulates transcriptional bursting kinetics. , 2021, Molecular cell.

[15]  K. Rippe,et al.  Transcription activation is enhanced by multivalent interactions independent of phase separation , 2021, bioRxiv.

[16]  J. Timmer,et al.  Liquid-liquid phase separation of light-inducible transcription factors increases transcription activation in mammalian cells and mice , 2021, Science Advances.

[17]  S. Hahn,et al.  Mediator subunit Med15 dictates the conserved “fuzzy” binding mechanism of yeast transcription activators Gal4 and Gcn4 , 2019, Nature Communications.

[18]  A. Holehouse,et al.  Intrinsically disordered protein regions and phase separation: sequence determinants of assembly or lack thereof. , 2020, Emerging topics in life sciences.

[19]  A. Pertsinidis,et al.  Single-gene imaging links genome topology, promoter-enhancer communication and transcription control , 2020, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

[20]  N. Barkai,et al.  Intrinsically Disordered Regions Direct Transcription Factor In Vivo Binding Specificity. , 2020, Molecular cell.

[21]  Diego M. Presman,et al.  Unraveling the molecular interactions involved in phase separation of glucocorticoid receptor , 2020, BMC Biology.

[22]  Zsuzsanna Dosztányi,et al.  Analyzing Protein Disorder with IUPred2A , 2020, Current protocols in bioinformatics.

[23]  M. Springer,et al.  Decoupling transcription factor expression and activity enables dimmer-switch gene regulation , 2020, bioRxiv.

[24]  C. Brangwynne,et al.  Nucleated transcriptional condensates amplify gene expression , 2019, Nature Cell Biology.

[25]  A. Pertsinidis,et al.  Single-Molecule Nanoscopy Elucidates RNA Polymerase II Transcription at Single Genes in Live Cells , 2019, Cell.

[26]  David Zwicker,et al.  Mechanisms of active regulation of biomolecular condensates , 2019, bioRxiv.

[27]  T. Lenstra,et al.  Live‐cell imaging reveals the interplay between transcription factors, nucleosomes, and bursting , 2019, The EMBO journal.

[28]  T. Mittag,et al.  Considerations and Challenges in Studying Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation and Biomolecular Condensates , 2019, Cell.

[29]  N. Hannett,et al.  Enhancer features that drive formation of transcriptional condensates , 2018, bioRxiv.

[30]  Anders S. Hansen,et al.  Guided nuclear exploration increases CTCF target search efficiency , 2018, bioRxiv.

[31]  N. Hannett,et al.  Transcription Factors Activate Genes through the Phase-Separation Capacity of Their Activation Domains , 2018, Cell.

[32]  Melissa M. Harrison,et al.  Temporal control of gene expression by the pioneer factor Zelda through transient interactions in hubs , 2018, Nature Communications.

[33]  P. Cramer,et al.  RNA polymerase II clustering through carboxy-terminal domain phase separation , 2018, Nature Structural & Molecular Biology.

[34]  Daniel S. Day,et al.  Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control , 2018, Science.

[35]  Charles H. Li,et al.  Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates , 2018, Science.

[36]  R. Tjian,et al.  Imaging dynamic and selective low-complexity domain interactions that control gene transcription , 2018, Science.

[37]  Melissa M. Harrison,et al.  Dynamic multifactor hubs interact transiently with sites of active transcription in Drosophila embryos , 2018, bioRxiv.

[38]  A. Aharoni,et al.  A Live-Cell Imaging Approach for Measuring DNA Replication Rates. , 2018, Cell reports.

[39]  Mustafa Mir,et al.  Dense Bicoid hubs accentuate binding along the morphogen gradient , 2017, bioRxiv.

[40]  S. Hohmann,et al.  Transcription factor clusters regulate genes in eukaryotic cells , 2017, bioRxiv.

[41]  R. Young,et al.  A Phase Separation Model for Transcriptional Control , 2017, Cell.

[42]  Jared E. Toettcher,et al.  Spatiotemporal Control of Intracellular Phase Transitions Using Light-Activated optoDroplets , 2017, Cell.

[43]  T. Lenstra,et al.  Single‐Molecule mRNA Detection in Live Yeast , 2016, Current protocols in molecular biology.

[44]  K. Quinlan,et al.  Directing an artificial zinc finger protein to new targets by fusion to a non-DNA-binding domain , 2015, Nucleic acids research.

[45]  Florian Finkernagel,et al.  Zinc Finger Independent Genome-Wide Binding of Sp2 Potentiates Recruitment of Histone-Fold Protein Nf-y Distinguishing It from Sp1 and Sp3 , 2015, PLoS genetics.

[46]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  3D imaging of Sox2 enhancer clusters in embryonic stem cells , 2014, eLife.

[47]  M. Crossley,et al.  Regions outside the DNA-binding domain are critical for proper in vivo specificity of an archetypal zinc finger transcription factor , 2013, Nucleic acids research.

[48]  S. McKnight,et al.  Phosphorylation-Regulated Binding of RNA Polymerase II to Fibrous Polymers of Low-Complexity Domains , 2013, Cell.

[49]  Xiaorong Tao,et al.  Self-Association of the Gal4 Inhibitor Protein Gal80 Is Impaired by Gal3: Evidence for a New Mechanism in the GAL Gene Switch , 2013, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[50]  B. Pugh,et al.  Comprehensive Genome-wide Protein-DNA Interactions Detected at Single-Nucleotide Resolution , 2011, Cell.

[51]  Bin Wu,et al.  Real-Time Observation of Transcription Initiation and Elongation on an Endogenous Yeast Gene , 2011, Science.

[52]  J. Thoden,et al.  The Interaction between an Acidic Transcriptional Activator and Its Inhibitor , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[53]  D. Speicher,et al.  Structural basis for dimerization in DNA recognition by Gal4. , 2008, Structure.

[54]  R. Sternglanz,et al.  NADP Regulates the Yeast GAL Induction System , 2008, Science.

[55]  M. Tokunaga,et al.  Highly inclined thin illumination enables clear single-molecule imaging in cells , 2008, Nature Methods.

[56]  R. J. Reece,et al.  Galactose metabolism in yeast-structure and regulation of the leloir pathway enzymes and the genes encoding them. , 2008, International review of cell and molecular biology.

[57]  J. MacKinnon.  Bootstrap Hypothesis Testing , 2007 .

[58]  M. Hodel,et al.  Nuclear Localization Signal Receptor Affinity Correlates with in Vivo Localization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[59]  A. Traven,et al.  Yeast Gal4: a transcriptional paradigm revisited , 2006, EMBO reports.

[60]  Michael R Green,et al.  In vivo target of a transcriptional activator revealed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. , 2004, Genes & development.

[61]  A. Mizutani,et al.  Regions of GAL4 critical for binding to a promoter in vivo revealed by a visual DNA‐binding analysis , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[62]  S. Johnston,et al.  The DNA binding and activation domains of Gal4p are sufficient for conveying its regulatory signals , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[63]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Transcriptional activation by recruitment , 1997, Nature.

[64]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Quantitation of putative activator‐target affinities predicts transcriptional activating potentials. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[65]  B. van Steensel,et al.  Localization of the glucocorticoid receptor in discrete clusters in the cell nucleus. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[66]  S. Johnston,et al.  GAL4 interacts with TATA-binding protein and coactivators , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[67]  Michael Carey,et al.  DNA recognition by GAL4: structure of a protein-DNA complex , 1992, Nature.

[68]  M. Johnston,et al.  Regulated expression of the GAL4 activator gene in yeast provides a sensitive genetic switch for glucose repression. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  J. Leatherwood,et al.  An amino-terminal fragment of GAL4 binds DNA as a dimer. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[70]  S. Fields,et al.  A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions , 1989, Nature.

[71]  Mark Ptashne,et al.  Negative effect of the transcriptional activator GAL4 , 1988, Nature.

[72]  P. Silver,et al.  Mutations that alter both localization and production of a yeast nuclear protein. , 1988, Genes & development.

[73]  M. Ptashne,et al.  The carboxy-terminal 30 amino acids of GAL4 are recognized by GAL80 , 1987, Cell.

[74]  R. Kornberg,et al.  A GAL family of upstream activating sequences in yeast: roles in both induction and repression of transcription. , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[75]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Specific DNA binding of GAL4, a positive regulatory protein of yeast , 1985, Cell.

[76]  P. Silver,et al.  Amino terminus of the yeast GAL4 gene product is sufficient for nuclear localization. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[77]  A. Laughon,et al.  Isolation and preliminary characterization of the GAL4 gene, a positive regulator of transcription in yeast. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.