A methodology for screening level control structures in plantwide control systems

Abstract In developing plantwide control structures, the very lowest loops, such as flow and level loops, are typically implemented using PID controllers. Here a general methodology for assessing the viability of plantwide level control strategies is presented. The methodology can be used as a screening tool to help direct a designer to plantwide control architectures that are promising. The approach is based on using steady-state gain matrices that include the rate of change of integrating variables, such as liquid levels. The relative gain and Niederlinski index are used to assess potential level control strategies. The methodology is applied to the Tennessee Eastman process, and it is shown that the vast majority of potential level control strategies are problematic in this plant. It is also shown that only two of the three levels in the process are integrating in nature. Insight into why the Tennessee Eastman process is so difficult to control is gained through the methodology.

[1]  JayHyung Lee,et al.  Nonlinear model predictive control of the Tennessee Eastman challenge process , 1995 .

[2]  Thomas J. McAvoy,et al.  Base control for the Tennessee Eastman problem , 1994 .

[3]  E. F. Vogel,et al.  A plant-wide industrial process control problem , 1993 .

[4]  William L. Luyben,et al.  Dynamics and control of recycle systems. 4. Ternary systems with one or two recycle streams , 1993 .

[5]  A. Niederlinski.  A heuristic approach to the design of linear multivariable interacting control systems , 1971 .

[6]  N. Lawrence Ricker,et al.  Decentralized control of the Tennessee Eastman Challenge Process , 1996 .

[7]  C. Georgakis,et al.  Plantwide regulatory control design procedure using a tiered framework , 1993 .

[8]  Evanghelos Zafiriou,et al.  Robust process control , 1987 .

[9]  W. Luyben.  Dynamics and control of recycle systems. 1. Simple open-loop and closed-loop systems , 1993 .

[10]  W. Luyben,et al.  Tuning PI controllers for integrator/dead time processes , 1992 .

[11]  A. Banerjee,et al.  Control configuration design applied to the Tennessee Eastman plant-wide control problem , 1995 .

[12]  Chen Gang,et al.  An improved base control for the Tennessee Eastman problem , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 American Control Conference - ACC'95.

[13]  J. D. Perkins,et al.  Selection of process control structure based on linear dynamic economics , 1993 .

[14]  William L. Luyben,et al.  Design and control of a complex process involving two reaction steps, three distillation columns, and two recycle streams , 1995 .

[15]  Yaman Arkun,et al.  A general method to calculate input-output gains and the relative gain array for integrating processes , 1990 .

[16]  T. McAvoy,et al.  Nonlinear Inferential Parallel Cascade Control , 1996 .

[17]  E. Bristol.  On a new measure of interaction for multivariable process control , 1966 .

[18]  Randy M. Miller,et al.  Incorporating Integrating Variables into Steady State Models for Plantwide Control Analysis and Design , 1998 .

[19]  Sigurd Skogestad,et al.  Pairing Criteria for Decentralized Control of Unstable Plants , 1994 .