Validity Ofvertical and Horizontal Individualism and Collectivism in Singapore

The cross-cultural construct validity of vertical and horizontal individualism (VI and HI) and horizontal and vertical collectivism (HC and VC) at the individual level of analysis is examined across 180 U.S. and 184 Singapore students. The findings showed that the four-factor structure was invariant for a 16-item attitudinal measure (although one item did not fit well), the U.S. students were more HI and the Singapore students were more VC, and the constructs had culture-general and culture-specific associations with values and interests. Although the cross-cultural validity of the structure and individualism-collectivism dimension of the constructs were supported, the precision of the operationalization of the vertical-horizontal dimension by the 16-item measure is called into question because the expected correlations were not found.

[1]  H. Triandis,et al.  Scenarios for the Measurement of Collectivism and Individualism , 1998 .

[2]  J. L. Holland,et al.  Making Vocational Choices: A Theory of Careers , 1973 .

[3]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications. , 1996 .

[4]  J. L. Holland,et al.  Making vocational choices : a theory of vocational personalities and work environments , 1984 .

[5]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Horizontal and Vertical Dimensions of Individualism and Collectivism: A Theoretical and Measurement Refinement , 1995 .

[6]  John W. Berry,et al.  Handbook of cross-cultural psychology : Volume 1. Theory and method, 2nd edition , 1996 .

[7]  S. Schwartz.  Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. , 1994 .

[8]  T. Little.  Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) Analyses of Cross-Cultural Data: Practical and Theoretical Issues. , 1997, Multivariate behavioral research.

[9]  H. Triandis,et al.  Allocentric versus idiocentric tendencies: Convergent and discriminant validation , 1985 .

[10]  H. Triandis.  The Psychological Measurement of Cultural Syndromes. , 1996 .

[11]  Shigehiro Oishi,et al.  The Measurement of Values and Individualism-Collectivism , 1998 .

[12]  M. Brewer,et al.  Scientific Inquiry and the Social Sciences: A Volume in Honor of Donald T. Campbell. , 1983 .

[13]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[14]  S. Schwartz.  Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values , 1994 .

[15]  Michael Harris Bond,et al.  On the Empirical Identification of Dimensions for Cross-Cultural Comparisons , 1989 .

[16]  M. Gelfand,et al.  Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism , 1998 .

[17]  Frederick T. L. Leong,et al.  Theoretical issues in cross-cultural career development: Cultural validity and cultural specificity. , 1995 .

[18]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language , 1993 .

[19]  Ronald Cohen,et al.  A handbook of method in cultural anthropology , 1973 .

[20]  Keith F Widaman,et al.  Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. , 1993, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  H. Triandis,et al.  Measurement in Cross-Cultural Psychology , 1985 .

[22]  Frederick T. L. Leong,et al.  Cross-Cultural Validation of Holland's Theory in Singapore: Beyond Structural Validity of RIASEC , 2001 .

[23]  Kwok Leung,et al.  Methods and data analysis of comparative research , 1997 .

[24]  W. Meredith.  Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance , 1993 .

[25]  H. Triandis.  Individualism And Collectivism , 1995 .

[26]  W. Walsh,et al.  Handbook of vocational psychology , 1983 .

[27]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .