Are Gabor phases really useless for face recognition?

Gabor features have been recognized as one of the best representations for face recognition. Usually, only the magnitudes of the Gabor coefficients are thought of as being useful for face recognition, while the phases of the Gabor features are deemed to be useless and thus usually ignored by face recognition researchers. However, in this paper, our findings show that the latter should be reconsidered. By encoding Gabor phases through local binary patterns and local histograms, we have achieved very impressive recognition results, which are comparable to those of Gabor magnitudes-based methods. The results of our experiments also indicate that, by combining the phases with the magnitudes, higher accuracy can be achieved. Such observations suggest that more attention should be paid to the Gabor phases for face recognition.

[1]  LinLin Shen,et al.  A review on Gabor wavelets for face recognition , 2006, Pattern Analysis and Applications.

[2]  John Daugman,et al.  How iris recognition works , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[3]  Shree K. Nayar,et al.  Multiresolution histograms and their use for recognition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Hyeonjoon Moon,et al.  The FERET evaluation methodology for face-recognition algorithms , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[5]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[6]  Norbert Krüger,et al.  Face recognition by elastic bunch graph matching , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing.

[7]  Joachim M. Buhmann,et al.  Distortion Invariant Object Recognition in the Dynamic Link Architecture , 1993, IEEE Trans. Computers.

[8]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[9]  Michael J. Swain,et al.  Color indexing , 1991, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[10]  Wen Gao,et al.  Local Gabor binary pattern histogram sequence (LGBPHS): a novel non-statistical model for face representation and recognition , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[11]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Face recognition: A literature survey , 2003, CSUR.

[13]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[14]  Xuelong Li,et al.  Gait Components and Their Application to Gender Recognition , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[15]  Wen Gao,et al.  Review the strength of Gabor features for face recognition from the angle of its robustness to mis-alignment , 2004, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004..

[16]  Wen Gao,et al.  AdaBoost Gabor Fisher Classifier for Face Recognition , 2005, AMFG.

[17]  Xuelong Li,et al.  General Tensor Discriminant Analysis and Gabor Features for Gait Recognition , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[18]  B. K. Julsing,et al.  Face Recognition with Local Binary Patterns , 2012 .

[19]  Chengjun Liu,et al.  Gabor feature based classification using the enhanced fisher linear discriminant model for face recognition , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..