A Unified Framework for Biomedical Terminologies and Ontologies

The goal of the OBO (Open Biomedical Ontologies) Foundry initiative is to create and maintain an evolving collection of non-overlapping interoperable ontologies that will offer unambiguous representations of the types of entities in biological and biomedical reality. These ontologies are designed to serve non-redundant annotation of data and scientific text. To achieve these ends, the Foundry imposes strict requirements upon the ontologies eligible for inclusion. While these requirements are not met by most existing biomedical terminologies, the latter may nonetheless support the Foundry's goal of consistent and non-redundant annotation if appropriate mappings of data annotated with their aid can be achieved. To construct such mappings in reliable fashion, however, it is necessary to analyze terminological resources from an ontologically realistic perspective in such a way as to identify the exact import of the 'concepts' and associated terms which they contain. We propose a framework for such analysis that is designed to maximize the degree to which legacy terminologies and the data coded with their aid can be successfully used for information-driven clinical and translational research.

[1]  J. R. Scotti,et al.  Available From , 1973 .

[2]  Barry Smith Fiat Objects , 2001 .

[3]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Mistakes in medical ontologies: where do they come from and how can they be detected? , 2004, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[4]  A. Rector,et al.  Relations in biomedical ontologies , 2005, Genome Biology.

[5]  Ole K. Hejlesen,et al.  Connecting Medical Informatics and Bio-Informatics , 2005 .

[6]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Towards a Reference Terminology for Ontology Research and Development in the Biomedical Domain , 2006, KR-MED.

[7]  James J. Cimino,et al.  In defense of the Desiderata , 2005, Journal of Biomedical Informatics.

[8]  Dan Suciu,et al.  A framework for using reference ontologies as a foundation for the semantic web , 2006, AMIA.

[9]  Christian Lovis,et al.  Reconciliation of Ontology and Terminology to Cope with Linguistics , 2007, MedInfo.

[10]  M. Ashburner,et al.  The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration , 2007, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Would SNOMED CT benefit from Realism-Based Ontology Evolution? , 2007, AMIA.

[12]  Michael Gruninger,et al.  Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference, FOIS 2008, Saarbrücken, Germany, October 31st - November 3rd, 2008 , 2008, FOIS.

[13]  Yannis Kalfoglou,et al.  Institutionalising ontology-based semantic integration , 2008, Appl. Ontology.

[14]  Cornelius Rosse,et al.  The Foundational Model of Anatomy Ontology , 2008, Anatomy Ontologies for Bioinformatics.

[15]  O Bodenreider,et al.  Biomedical ontologies in action: role in knowledge management, data integration and decision support. , 2008, Yearbook of medical informatics.

[16]  Barry Smith Ontology (Science) , 2008, FOIS.

[17]  Werner Ceusters,et al.  Toward an Ontological Treatment of Disease and Diagnosis , 2009, Summit on translational bioinformatics.

[18]  William R. Hogan What's in an 'is a' link? , 2009 .

[19]  Ronald Cornet,et al.  SNOMED CT’s Ontological Commitment , 2009 .