Conducting Visual Surveys with a Small ROV in Shallow Water

Small remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), sometimes described as low-cost (<$150,000) ROVs, have become valuable tools in the study of marine organisms and their habitats. The versatility and relative simplicity of these vehicles is enabling scientists and fishery managers to develop a better understanding of the marine ecosystem that has not been possible using conventional survey methodologies. The ability to work at depths beyond the reach of scuba divers and in complex habitats inaccessible to trawl surveys is helping to “fill the information gap” between nearshore and deep offshore habitats, allowing for the development of more comprehensive management strategies of the ocean’s resources. Small ROVs are especially suited for use by natural resource agencies and academic institutions operating on limited budgets with minimal resources. In calm, nearshore conditions, a small ROV can be operated from vessels as small as 6 m with a minimum of equipment and crew. In contrast, conducting safe, quantitative surveys with a small ROV in more extreme marine environments increases the complexity of the operation and requires additional equipment and personnel to ensure success. This paper focuses on the technical aspects of designing and conducting shallow-water (<200 m) surveys with a small ROV, based on our experience using a Deep Ocean Engineering Phantom HD2+2 ROV in San Juan Channel, Washington. Topics addressed include equipment, navigation and tracking, deployment protocols, tether management, camera calibration, survey design, data collection, hazards and safety, transect length and width, and recent technological developments.

[1]  David O. Evans,et al.  Use of a Remotely Operated Vehicle to Study Habitat and Population Density of Juvenile Lake Trout , 1997 .

[2]  Donna M. Kocak,et al.  Remote sensing using laser projection photogrammetry for underwater surveys , 2004, IGARSS 2004. 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[3]  David S. Fox,et al.  Upwelling-driven nearshore hypoxia signals ecosystem and oceanographic changes in the northeast Pacific , 2004, Nature.

[4]  D. D. Hardin,et al.  Investigating seafloor disturbances with a small ROV , 1992 .

[5]  M. Clancy,et al.  Impacts of Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs) on the behavior of marine animals: an example using American lobsters , 1994 .

[6]  David J. Csepp,et al.  ROV Operation from a Small Boat , 2005 .

[7]  F. M. Caimi,et al.  Laser projection photogrammetry and video system for quantification and mensuration , 2002, OCEANS '02 MTS/IEEE.

[8]  Hanumant Singh,et al.  Advances in Doppler-based navigation of underwater robotic vehicles , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[9]  M. Zimmermann,et al.  Demersal groundfish densities in trawlable and untrawlable habitats off Washington: implications for the estimation of habitat bias in trawl surveys , 2003 .

[10]  H. Jachmann Comparison of aerial counts with ground counts for large African herbivores , 2002 .

[11]  F. Mueter,et al.  The use of an ROV in the study of juvenile flatfish , 1999 .

[12]  H. Sprunk,et al.  Modifications to low-cost remotely operated vehicles for scientific sampling , 1992 .

[13]  H. Sprunk,et al.  Scientific imaging with ROVs: tools and techniques , 1989 .

[14]  Malcolm B. Jones,et al.  Identification of patch structure within marine benthic landscapes using a remotely operated vehicle , 2003 .

[15]  Bruce H. Robison,et al.  Application Of Line Transect Methods To Surveying Demersal, Communities With Rovs And Manned Submersibles , 1991, OCEANS 91 Proceedings.

[16]  R. F. Tusting,et al.  Laser systems and structured illumination for quantitative undersea imaging , 1992 .