Bio-compatibility in selection of materials for implantation.

In this paper the factors which contribute importantly to incompatibility and functional failure of implant materials are examined. The interaction of these criteria in the etiology of implant failure is discussed in terms of the host response to an inert implant and the modulation of this response in the presence of cytotoxic sequellae. Cellular injury either of traumatic or biochemical origin is seen to stimulate sequestration of the offending implant by fibrous tissue. Difficulties associated with routine quantification of such response by animal implantation studies have led to development of rapid in vitro techniques to predict the quantity and cytotoxicity of moeities released by an implant. These techniques are based on infrared analysis and primary mammalian tissue culture with a pseudo body fluid to which materials are exposed at elevated temperature. The protocols allow formulation of rational criteria for rejection of candidate materials for clinical implantation and acceptance for definitive preclinical animal implant studies. The procedures are applicable for routine monitoring of materials accepted for fabrication of prototype or production implants and of fabricated prostheses.

[1]  C. Homsy,et al.  Biochemical engineering materials screening and monitoring. , 1969, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[2]  M. Debakey,et al.  THE FATE OF DACRON VASCULAR GRAFTS. , 1964, Archives of surgery.

[3]  D. Lyman,et al.  THE EFFECT OF CHEMICAL STRUCTURE AND SURFACE PROPERTIES OF POLYMERS ON THE COAGULATION OF BLOOD. I. SURFACE FREE ENERGY EFFECTS. , 1965, Transactions - American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.

[4]  R. Carmen,et al.  In vitro testing of silicone rubber heart-valve poppets for liquid absorption. , 1968, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[5]  P. Sawyer THE EFFECT OF VARIOUS METAL INTERFACES ON BLOOD AND OTHER LIVING CELLS * , 1968, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  A. Ferguson,et al.  Tissue reaction in rabbit muscle exposed to metallic implants. , 1967, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  T. Gillman,et al.  Studies in the healing of cutaneous wounds. I. The healing of incisions through the skin of pigs. , 1966, Archives of surgery.

[8]  Szczypinski Af Present status of suture materials. , 1966 .

[9]  N. D. Greene,et al.  Corrosion and fracture of type 316 SMO orthopedic implants. , 1969, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  E. Oppenheimer,et al.  Observations on the effects of powdered polymer in the carcinogenic process. , 1961, Cancer research.

[11]  J. Cahoon,et al.  Metallurgical analyses of failed orthopedic implants. , 1968, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[12]  R. Dutton,et al.  Heparin Bonding on Colloidal Graphite Surfaces , 1963, Science.

[13]  R. Oglesby,et al.  The behavior of biological materials at different sites of implantation. , 1968, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[14]  R. D. Falb,et al.  BLOOD‐COMPATIBLE PLASTICS * , 1968, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[15]  J. Autian,et al.  TISSUE CULTURE METHOD FOR SCREENING TOXICITY OF PLASTIC MATERIALS TO BE USED IN MEDICAL PRACTICE. , 1965, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.