The influence of weather conditions on the activity of high-arctic arthropods inferred from long-term observations

BackgroundClimate change is particularly pronounced in the High Arctic and a better understanding of the repercussions on ecological processes like herbivory, predation and pollination is needed. Arthropods play an important role in the high-arctic ecosystem and this role is determined by their density and activity. However, density and activity may be sensitive to separate components of climate. Earlier emergence due to advanced timing of snowmelt following climate change may expose adult arthropods to unchanged temperatures but higher levels of radiation. The capture rate of arthropods in passive open traps like pitfall trap integrates density and activity and, therefore, serves as a proxy of the magnitude of such arthropod-related ecological processes. We used arthropod pitfall trapping data and weather data from 10 seasons in high-arctic Greenland to identify climatic effects on the activity pattern of nine arthropod taxa.ResultsWe were able to statistically separate the variation in capture rates into a non-linear component of capture date (density) and a linear component of weather (activity). The non-linear proxy of density always accounted for more of the variation than the linear component of weather. After accounting for the seasonal phenological development, the most important weather variable influencing the capture rate of flying arthropods was temperature, while surface-dwelling species were principally influenced by solar radiation.ConclusionConsistent with previous findings, air temperature best explained variation in the activity level of flying insects. An advancement of the phenology in this group due to earlier snowmelt will make individuals appear earlier in the season, but parallel temperature increases could mean that individuals are exposed to similar temperatures. Hence, the effect of climatic changes on the activity pattern in this group may be unchanged. In contrast, we found that solar radiation is a better proxy of activity levels than air temperature in surface-dwelling arthropods. An advancement of the phenology may expose surface-dwelling arthropods to higher levels of solar radiation, which suggest that their locomotory performance is enhanced and their contribution to ecological processes is increased.

[1]  Jesper Heile Christensen,et al.  Future climate change: Modeling and scenarios for the Arctic , 2005 .

[2]  E. Marshall,et al.  Isolating the components of activity-density for the carabid beetle Pterostichus melanarius in farmland , 1998, Oecologia.

[3]  J. Bale,et al.  Life on the edge: insect ecology in arctic environments. , 1998, Annual review of entomology.

[4]  H. Danks.  SOME EFFECTS OF PHOTOPERIOD, TEMPERATURE, AND FOOD ON EMERGENCE IN THREE SPECIES OF CHIRONOMIDAE (DIPTERA) , 1978, The Canadian Entomologist.

[5]  R. Briers,et al.  Flight activity of adult stoneflies in relation to weather , 2003 .

[6]  Erlendur Jónsson,et al.  A new window trap used in the assessment of the flight periods of Chironomidae and Simuliidae (Diptera) , 1986 .

[7]  S. F. Maclean,et al.  Seasonal Patterns of Abundance of Tundra Arthropods near Barrow , 1971 .

[8]  C. Topping,et al.  Limitations to the use of pitfall traps in ecological studies exemplified by a study of spiders in a field of winter wheat , 1992 .

[9]  P. Corbet,et al.  SEASONAL EMERGENCE AND ACTIVITY OF MOSQUITOES (DIPTERA: CULICIDAE) IN A HIGH-ARCTIC LOCALITY , 1973, The Canadian Entomologist.

[10]  Toke T. Høye,et al.  Phenology of High-Arctic Arthropods: Effects of Climate on Spatial, Seasonal, and Inter-Annual Variation , 2008 .

[11]  Toke T. Høye,et al.  Rapid advancement of spring in the High Arctic , 2007, Current Biology.

[12]  C. Nansen,et al.  Flight Activity of the Lesser Grain Borer, Rhyzopertha dominica F. (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae), in Relation to Weather , 2006 .

[13]  S. L. Sutton,et al.  The effect of microclimate on flying dipterans , 1992 .

[14]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[15]  M. Service,et al.  Effects of wind on the behaviour and distribution of mosquitoes and blackflies , 1980 .

[16]  O. Hoegh‐Guldberg,et al.  Ecological responses to recent climate change , 2002, Nature.

[17]  J. Waringer.  Phenology and the influence of meteorological parameters on the catching success of light-trapping for Trichoptera , 1991 .

[18]  S. Schueler,et al.  Estimating the density of ground-dwelling arthropods with pitfall traps using a nested-cross array , 2004 .