Competition and Selection in Language Evolution

The primary thesis of this paper is that selection plays a role in language evolution. Underlying this position is the assumption that a language is a Lamarckian species, a construct extrapolated from idiolects spoken by individuals who acknowledge using the same verbal code to communicate with each other. There is no perfect replication in any case of language “acquisition”, which is actually a recreation process in which the learner makes a system out of features selected from utterances of different individuals with whom he/she has interacted. In a way similar to gene recombination in biology, each learner gradually and selectively reintegrates into new system features which are often modified in the process. At the population level, the congruence of some divergent idiolectal selections is often strong enough for a language to evolve into a new communal system. A fundamental question for my hypothesis is: What principles regulate selection? I also assume hybridism in language “transmission”, which is polyploidic, as features of every idiolect originate not only in various competing idiolects, but possibly also in different dialects or languages in contact. The question about feature selection remains the same.

[1]  D. Hull,et al.  Species, Languages and the Comparative Method , 2002 .

[2]  Michel DeGraff Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony, and Development , 2001 .

[3]  S. Mufwene Creolization is a social, not a structural, process , 2001 .

[4]  Sarah G. Thomason,et al.  A typology of contact languages , 1997 .

[5]  N. Smith,et al.  Pidgins and Creoles. An Introduction , 1994 .

[6]  W. Bruce Croft Typology and Universals , 1990 .

[7]  Claude Hagège,et al.  The Language Builder: An essay on the human signature in linguistic morphogenesis , 1993 .

[8]  Salikoko S. Mufwene,et al.  Pidgins, Creoles, Typology, and Markedness , 1991 .

[9]  H. R. Harvey,et al.  Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics , 1990 .

[10]  D. Bickerton The language bioprogram hypothesis , 1984, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[11]  R. Lewontin The Units of Selection , 1970, The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory.

[12]  D. Bolinger GETTING THE WORDS IN , 1970 .

[13]  David Lightfoot,et al.  Explaining language change: an evolutionary approach , 2002 .

[14]  S. Mufwene Review of From French to Creole: The development of new vernaculars in the French colonial world , 2002 .

[15]  S. Mufwene The ecology of language evolution , 2001 .

[16]  R. Chaudenson,et al.  Creolization of language and culture , 2001 .

[17]  E. Curtis,et al.  The Proceedings of the sixteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , 1998 .

[18]  J MaynardSmith,et al.  The units of selection. , 1998, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[19]  Salikoko S. Mufwene,et al.  The founder principle in creole genesis , 1996 .

[20]  Salikoko S. Mufwene,et al.  Why Grammars are Not Monolithic , 1992 .

[21]  R. Chaudenson Des îles, des hommes, des langues : essai sur la créolisation linguistique et culturelle , 1992 .

[22]  Elliott Sober,et al.  The Nature of Selection , 1984 .

[23]  Robert Dixon,et al.  Where have all the adjectives gone? and other essays in semantics and syntax , 1982 .

[24]  A. Meillet La chronologie des langues indo-européennes et le développement du genre féminin , 1930 .