Effects of Sedation by Intramuscular Administration of Medetomidine on Canine Abdominal Vascular System and Hepatic Parenchyma Imaging Using Enhancement Dynamic Computed Tomography

This prospective crossover study compared the effects of intramuscular administration of medetomidine for sedation on parameters of the abdominal vascular system, measured by enhancement computed tomography (CT), to those of propofol-induced sevoflurane maintenance anesthesia, as a control, in five clinically healthy adult male beagle dogs (11.4–12.8 kg). Each animal underwent both protocols at a 1-week interval. The enhancement (HU) and time to peak enhancement on CT were measured for the aorta (AO), caudal vena cava (CVC), portal vein (PV), and hepatic parenchyma (HP). The contrast effects in the AO, PV, and HP were significantly delayed under medetomidine sedation compared to the control anesthesia protocol. Particularly, the contrast effect in the PV and HP was significantly delayed under sedation, appearing approximately 1 min after contrast medium injection. This delay likely reflects the peripheral vasoconstrictive effect of medetomidine. We noted a generally early high contrast enhancement of the CVC under medetomidine sedation, likely contributed by the induced bradycardia. Therefore, findings obtained on contrast enhancement CT under medetomidine sedation may be different from those obtained under propofol-induced sevoflurane maintenance anesthesia. These differences are important to consider when using the findings to inform diagnosis.

[1]  M. Takiguchi,et al.  Computed tomographic features for differentiating benign from malignant liver lesions in dogs , 2019, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[2]  Sangeeta Rao,et al.  Computed tomographic angiography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis and evaluation of acute pancreatitis in dogs , 2018, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[3]  F. Dako,et al.  Dependent layering of venous refluxed contrast: A sign of critically low cardiac output , 2018, Radiology case reports.

[4]  Sangeeta Rao,et al.  CT angiographic changes in dogs with acute pancreatitis: A prospective longitudinal study. , 2019, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[5]  J. Kirpensteijn,et al.  Utility of contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the evaluation of canine insulinoma location , 2018, The Veterinary quarterly.

[6]  K. Edamura,et al.  Triple-phase helical computed tomography in dogs with solid splenic masses , 2017, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[7]  Sang-Kwon Lee,et al.  Effect of catheter size and injection rate of contrast agent on enhancement and image quality for triple‐phase helical computed tomography of the liver in small dogs , 2017, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[8]  K. Awai,et al.  Aortic and Hepatic Contrast Enhancement During Hepatic-Arterial and Portal Venous Phase Computed Tomography Scanning: Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis Using Age, Sex, Total Body Weight, Height, and Cardiac Output , 2017, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  Jiwon Seo,et al.  Optimal scan delay depending on contrast material injection duration in abdominal multi-phase computed tomography of pancreas and liver in normal Beagle dogs , 2016, Journal of veterinary science.

[10]  K. Edamura,et al.  Preoperative Differential Diagnosis of Canine Adrenal Tumors Using Triple-Phase Helical Computed Tomography. , 2016, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[11]  H. Tsujimoto,et al.  Characterization of triple-phase computed tomography in dogs with pancreatic insulinoma , 2015, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[12]  R. Kirberger,et al.  Triple phase dynamic computed tomographic perfusion characteristics of spirocercosis induced esophageal nodules in non-neoplastic versus neoplastic canine cases. , 2015, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[13]  H. Tsujimoto,et al.  Computed tomographic morphology and clinical features of extrahepatic portosystemic shunts in 172 dogs in Japan. , 2014, Veterinary journal.

[14]  K. Edamura,et al.  Triple-phase helical computed tomography in dogs with hepatic masses. , 2014, Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound.

[15]  R. Stollberger,et al.  Determination of cardiac output with dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[16]  R. O’Brien,et al.  Feasibility for using dual-phase contrast-enhanced multi-detector helical computed tomography to evaluate awake and sedated dogs with acute abdominal signs. , 2012, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[17]  I. Robertson,et al.  Optimization of contrast-enhanced multidetector abdominal computed tomography in sedated canine patients. , 2012, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[18]  H. Tsujimoto,et al.  CT characteristics of primary hepatic mass lesions in dogs. , 2012, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[19]  T. Iwasaki,et al.  Effect of contrast media formulation on computed tomography angiographic contrast enhancement. , 2008, Veterinary Radiology & Ultrasound.

[20]  L. Espino,et al.  Effects of medetomidine on doppler variables of major abdominal arteries in normal dogs , 2008, Veterinary Research Communications.

[21]  N. Bogot,et al.  Dependent venous contrast pooling and layering: a sign of imminent cardiogenic shock. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[22]  A. Zwingenberger,et al.  Dual-phase CT angiography of the normal canine portal and hepatic vasculature. , 2004, Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association.

[23]  J. Chen,et al.  Dependent pooling: a contrast-enhanced sign of cardiac arrest during CT. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  C. McGrath,et al.  Comparison of sedative and cardiorespiratory effects of medetomidine-butorphanol and medetomidine-ketamine combination in dogs. , 2000, Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia.

[25]  B. Pypendop,et al.  Hemodynamic effects of medetomidine in the dog: a dose titration study. , 1998, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[26]  L. Pablo,et al.  Comparison of sedative and cardiorespiratory effects of medetomidine and medetomidine-butorphanol combination in dogs. , 1996, American journal of veterinary research.

[27]  J. Rand,et al.  Echocardiographic evaluation of the effects of medetomidine and xylazine in dogs. , 1996, Australian veterinary journal.

[28]  R. Nishimura,et al.  Comparison of sedative effects induced by medetomidine, medetomidine-midazolam and medetomidine-butorphanol in dogs. , 1994, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[29]  suprascapularis V. AXILLARIS,et al.  VEINS , 1939, Springer Japan.