The evolution of knowledge within and across fields in modern physics

The exchange of knowledge across different areas and disciplines plays a key role in the process of knowledge creation, and can stimulate innovation and the emergence of new fields. We develop here a quantitative framework to extract significant dependencies among scientific disciplines and turn them into a time-varying network whose nodes are the different fields, while the weighted links represent the flow of knowledge from one field to another at a given period of time. Drawing on a comprehensive data set on scientific production in modern physics and on the patterns of citations between articles published in the various fields in the last 30 years, we are then able to map, over time, how the ideas developed in a given field in a certain time period have influenced later discoveries in the same field or in other fields. The analysis of knowledge flows internal to each field displays a remarkable variety of temporal behaviours, with some fields of physics showing to be more self-referential than others. The temporal networks of knowledge exchanges across fields reveal cases of one field continuously absorbing knowledge from another field in the entire observed period, pairs of fields mutually influencing each other, but also cases of evolution from absorbing to mutual or even to back-nurture behaviors.

[1]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Mapping the physics research space: a machine learning approach , 2019, EPJ Data Science.

[2]  Sune Lehmann,et al.  The chaperone effect in scientific publishing , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Hai Zhuge,et al.  A knowledge flow model for peer-to-peer team knowledge sharing and management , 2002, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Filippo Radicchi,et al.  Changing demographics of scientific careers: The rise of the temporary workforce , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Vincent D. Blondel,et al.  Career on the Move: Geography, Stratification, and Scientific Impact , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Karin Fladmoe-Lindquist,et al.  Breakthrough innovations in the U.S. biotechnology industry: the effects of technological space and geographic origin , 2006 .

[7]  Takashige Ishikawa,et al.  A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON SHEAR STRENGTH OF PUSH-OUT TESTS OF HEADED STUDS: Comprehensive and holistic analysis focusing on the type of slab, failure mode, and stud diameter , 2017 .

[8]  Peter Y. T. Sun,et al.  The impact of national cultures on structured knowledge transfer , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[9]  Vito Latora,et al.  The advantages of interdisciplinarity in modern science , 2017, 1712.07910.

[10]  Erjia Yan,et al.  Disciplinary knowledge production and diffusion in science , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Jari Saramäki,et al.  The evolution of interdisciplinarity in physics research , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[12]  T. Aste,et al.  Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers , 2019, Nature Communications.

[13]  Toni Giorgino,et al.  Exploring the role of interdisciplinarity in physics: Success, talent and luck , 2019, PloS one.

[14]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow , 2002 .

[15]  Han Zhu,et al.  Effect of aging on network structure. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[16]  Vito Latora,et al.  Anatomy of funded research in science , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  S. Shen-Orr,et al.  Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. , 2002, Science.

[18]  Nicola Elvassore,et al.  Extracellular matrix hydrogel derived from decellularized tissues enables endodermal organoid culture , 2019, Nature Communications.

[19]  Horatio M. Morgan,et al.  An Integrative Framework , 2019, Underdog Entrepreneurs.

[20]  H. Triandis,et al.  Cultural Variations in the Cross-Border Transfer of Organizational Knowledge: An Integrative Framework , 2002 .

[21]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  The dynamics of correlated novelties , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Vittorio Loreto,et al.  Efficient team structures in an open-ended cooperative creativity experiment , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science , 2002, Scientometrics.

[24]  Michael Szell,et al.  A century of physics , 2015, Nature Physics.

[25]  Weimao Ke,et al.  Mapping the diffusion of scholarly knowledge among major U.S. research institutions , 2006, Scientometrics.

[26]  Richard Van Noorden.  Interdisciplinary research by the numbers , 2015, Nature.

[27]  M. Kunitski,et al.  Double-slit photoelectron interference in strong-field ionization of the neon dimer , 2018, Nature Communications.

[28]  Tian Wei,et al.  Interrelations among scientific fields and their relative influences revealed by an input-output analysis , 2015, J. Informetrics.

[30]  Floriana Gargiulo,et al.  Driving forces of researchers mobility , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[31]  Daniel B. Larremore,et al.  Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks , 2015, Science Advances.

[32]  Martin Meyer,et al.  Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems , 2002, Scientometrics.

[33]  Ufuk Akcigit,et al.  Innovation network , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Ajay Agrawal,et al.  How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data , 2008 .

[35]  Diego Garlaschelli,et al.  Patterns of link reciprocity in directed networks. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[36]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex Networks: Principles, Methods and Applications , 2017 .

[37]  Michael Szell,et al.  Taking census of physics , 2019, Nature Reviews Physics.

[38]  Iman Tahamtan,et al.  Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature , 2016, Scientometrics.

[39]  Vanessa Cirkel-Bartelt,et al.  History of Astroparticle Physics and its Components , 2008, Living reviews in relativity.

[40]  Matjaz Perc,et al.  Self-organization of progress across the century of physics , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[41]  Qian Zhang,et al.  Characterizing scientific production and consumption in Physics , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[42]  Giuliano Armano,et al.  The Beneficial Role of Mobility for the Emergence of Innovation , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[43]  Vito Latora,et al.  Network dynamics of innovation processes , 2017, Physical review letters.

[44]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Geography, Networks, and Knowledge Flow , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[45]  Namita Srivastava,et al.  The Machine‐Learning Approach , 2020, Machine Learning for iOS Developers.