Covalent Docking Predicts Substrates for Haloalkanoate Dehalogenase Superfamily Phosphatases

Enzyme function prediction remains an important open problem. Though structure-based modeling, such as metabolite docking, can identify substrates of some enzymes, it is ill-suited to reactions that progress through a covalent intermediate. Here we investigated the ability of covalent docking to identify substrates that pass through such a covalent intermediate, focusing particularly on the haloalkanoate dehalogenase superfamily. In retrospective assessments, covalent docking recapitulated substrate binding modes of known cocrystal structures and identified experimental substrates from a set of putative phosphorylated metabolites. In comparison, noncovalent docking of high-energy intermediates yielded nonproductive poses. In prospective predictions against seven enzymes, a substrate was identified for five. For one of those cases, a covalent docking prediction, confirmed by empirical screening, and combined with genomic context analysis, suggested the identity of the enzyme that catalyzes the orphan phosphatase reaction in the riboflavin biosynthetic pathway of Bacteroides.

[1]  A. van Loon,et al.  Regulation of Riboflavin Biosynthesis inBacillus subtilis Is Affected by the Activity of the Flavokinase/Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide Synthetase Encoded byribC , 1998, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  Eyal Akiva,et al.  Prediction and characterization of enzymatic activities guided by sequence similarity and genome neighborhood networks , 2014, eLife.

[3]  M. Holmquist,et al.  Alpha/Beta-hydrolase fold enzymes: structures, functions and mechanisms. , 2000, Current protein & peptide science.

[4]  Johannes C. Hermann,et al.  Structure-based activity prediction for an enzyme of unknown function , 2007, Nature.

[5]  Daniel W. A. Buchan,et al.  A large-scale evaluation of computational protein function prediction , 2013, Nature Methods.

[6]  J. Collet,et al.  A New Class of Phosphotransferases Phosphorylated on an Aspartate Residue in an Amino-terminal DXDX(T/V) Motif* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  T. Grundström,et al.  The acyl-enzyme mechanism of beta-lactamase action. The evidence for class C Beta-lactamases. , 1982, The Biochemical journal.

[8]  A. Leach,et al.  Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  J. Silberg,et al.  A transposase strategy for creating libraries of circularly permuted proteins , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  Janet M Thornton,et al.  Ligand selectivity and competition between enzymes in silico , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[11]  G. Klebe Virtual ligand screening: strategies, perspectives and limitations , 2006, Drug Discovery Today.

[12]  Gregory D. Schuler,et al.  Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information: update , 2004, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  J. Oakeshott,et al.  Kinetic and Sequence-Structure-Function Analysis of LinB Enzyme Variants with β- and δ-Hexachlorocyclohexane , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  Trey Ideker,et al.  Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization , 2010, Bioinform..

[15]  Mary Jo Ondrechen,et al.  Protein function annotation with Structurally Aligned Local Sites of Activity (SALSAs) , 2013, BMC Bioinformatics.

[16]  K N Houk,et al.  Why enzymes are proficient catalysts: beyond the Pauling paradigm. , 2005, Accounts of chemical research.

[17]  Heidi J. Imker,et al.  The Enzyme Function Initiative. , 2011, Biochemistry.

[18]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  Rapid Context-Dependent Ligand Desolvation in Molecular Docking , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[19]  A. Bacher,et al.  BIOSYNTHESIS OF VITAMIN B 2 (RIBOFLAVIN) , 2000 .

[20]  A. Bacher,et al.  Enzymes from the Haloacid Dehalogenase (HAD) Superfamily Catalyse the Elusive Dephosphorylation Step of Riboflavin Biosynthesis , 2013, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[21]  J. A. Maclaren THE EFFECTS OF CERTAIN PURINES AND PYRIMIDINES UPON THE PRODUCTION OF RIBOFLAVIN BY EREMOTHECIUM ASHBYII , 1952, Journal of bacteriology.

[22]  V. Bandarian,et al.  Biochemical and Structural Studies of 6-Carboxy-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterin Synthase Reveal the Molecular Basis of Catalytic Promiscuity within the Tunnel-fold Superfamily* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  Richard N. Armstrong,et al.  Prediction of Substrates for Glutathione Transferases by Covalent Docking , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[24]  D. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing , 1990, Proteins.

[25]  S. Roje,et al.  An FMN Hydrolase of the Haloacid Dehalogenase Superfamily Is Active in Plant Chloroplasts* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  A. Warshel Electrostatic Origin of the Catalytic Power of Enzymes and the Role of Preorganized Active Sites* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[27]  Roland L. Dunbrack Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[28]  R Abagyan,et al.  Flexible protein–ligand docking by global energy optimization in internal coordinates , 1997, Proteins.

[29]  Andrej Sali,et al.  Assignment of pterin deaminase activity to an enzyme of unknown function guided by homology modeling and docking. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[30]  A. Warshel,et al.  On catalytic preorganization in oxyanion holes: highlighting the problems with the gas-phase modeling of oxyanion holes and illustrating the need for complete enzyme models. , 2010, The Journal of organic chemistry.

[31]  Adam Godzik,et al.  Crystal structure of a metal‐dependent phosphoesterase (YP_910028.1) from Bifidobacterium adolescentis: Computational prediction and experimental validation of phosphoesterase activity , 2011, Proteins.

[32]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Hierarchical docking of databases of multiple ligand conformations. , 2005, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[33]  Nir London,et al.  Covalent Docking of Large Libraries for the Discovery of Chemical Probes , 2014, Nature chemical biology.

[34]  Iddo Friedberg,et al.  Automated protein function predictionçthe genomic challenge , 2006 .

[35]  Patricia C. Babbitt,et al.  Prediction of function for the polyprenyl transferase subgroup in the isoprenoid synthase superfamily , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Brian K Shoichet,et al.  Structure-based discovery of a novel, noncovalent inhibitor of AmpC beta-lactamase. , 2002, Structure.

[37]  J. Gasteiger,et al.  Automatic generation of 3D-atomic coordinates for organic molecules , 1990 .

[38]  Janet M Thornton,et al.  Towards fully automated structure-based function prediction in structural genomics: a case study. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  S. Cahill,et al.  Kinetic and mechanistic analysis of the Escherichia coli ribD-encoded bifunctional deaminase-reductase involved in riboflavin biosynthesis. , 2008, Biochemistry.

[40]  Michael A. Hicks,et al.  The Structure–Function Linkage Database , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[41]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Using shape complementarity as an initial screen in designing ligands for a receptor binding site of known three-dimensional structure. , 1988, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[42]  The UniProt Consortium,et al.  Reorganizing the protein space at the Universal Protein Resource (UniProt) , 2011, Nucleic Acids Res..

[43]  Liran Carmel,et al.  Genome-wide Analysis of Substrate Specificities of the Escherichia coli Haloacid Dehalogenase-like Phosphatase Family* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[44]  J. Kraut Serine proteases: structure and mechanism of catalysis. , 1977, Annual review of biochemistry.

[45]  Jeremy R. Greenwood,et al.  Epik: a software program for pKa prediction and protonation state generation for drug-like molecules , 2007, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[46]  Patricia C. Babbitt,et al.  Biases in the Experimental Annotations of Protein Function and Their Effect on Our Understanding of Protein Function Space , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[47]  Karen N. Allen,et al.  Markers of fitness in a successful enzyme superfamily. , 2009, Current opinion in structural biology.

[48]  John J Irwin,et al.  Predicting substrates by docking high-energy intermediates to enzyme structures. , 2006, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[49]  Angelo D. Favia,et al.  Molecular docking for substrate identification: the short-chain dehydrogenases/reductases. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  Mark D'Souza,et al.  From Genetic Footprinting to Antimicrobial Drug Targets: Examples in Cofactor Biosynthetic Pathways , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[51]  Shoshana D. Brown,et al.  Homology models guide discovery of diverse enzyme specificities among dipeptide epimerases in the enolase superfamily , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Virtual screening against highly charged active sites: identifying substrates of alpha-beta barrel enzymes. , 2005, Biochemistry.

[53]  C. Orengo,et al.  One fold with many functions: the evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[54]  Peter Rossmanith,et al.  Simulated Annealing , 2008, Taschenbuch der Algorithmen.

[55]  Daniel S. Hitchcock,et al.  Substrate Deconstruction and the Nonadditivity of Enzyme Recognition , 2014, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[56]  M. Fischer 7.02 – Riboflavin Biosynthesis , 2010 .

[57]  Benjamin A. Ellingson,et al.  Conformer Generation with OMEGA: Algorithm and Validation Using High Quality Structures from the Protein Databank and Cambridge Structural Database , 2010, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[58]  Matthew P Jacobson,et al.  Computation-facilitated assignment of the function in the enolase superfamily: a regiochemically distinct galactarate dehydratase from Oceanobacillus iheyensis . , 2009, Biochemistry.

[59]  D. Dunaway-Mariano,et al.  The catalytic scaffold of the haloalkanoic acid dehalogenase enzyme superfamily acts as a mold for the trigonal bipyramidal transition state , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  Gregory D. Hawkins,et al.  Extension of the platform of applicability of the SM5.42R universal solvation model , 1999 .

[61]  Christine A. Orengo,et al.  Exploiting Protein Structures to Predict Protein Functions , 2011 .

[62]  Peter Kolb,et al.  Functional Annotation and Structural Characterization of a Novel Lactonase Hydrolyzing d-Xylono-1,4-lactone-5-phosphate and l-Arabino-1,4-lactone-5-phosphate , 2014, Biochemistry.

[63]  A. Bacher,et al.  Biosynthesis of vitamin b2 (riboflavin). , 2000, Annual review of nutrition.

[64]  Daniel S. Hitchcock,et al.  Structure-guided discovery of new deaminase enzymes. , 2013, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[65]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Virtual screening: an endless staircase? , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[66]  K. Sharp,et al.  Calculating the electrostatic potential of molecules in solution: Method and error assessment , 1988 .

[67]  Siewert J. Marrink,et al.  Computationally Efficient and Accurate Enantioselectivity Modeling by Clusters of Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2014, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[68]  G. Schneider,et al.  The manifold of vitamin B6 dependent enzymes. , 2000, Structure.

[69]  Ritesh Kumar,et al.  Discovery of new enzymes and metabolic pathways using structure and genome context , 2016 .

[70]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  Structure-Based Discovery of a Novel, Noncovalent Inhibitor of AmpC β-Lactamase , 2002 .

[71]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Functional annotation and three-dimensional structure of Dr0930 from Deinococcus radiodurans, a close relative of phosphotriesterase in the amidohydrolase superfamily. , 2009, Biochemistry.