Giving Gossips Their Due: Information Provision in Games with Private Monitoring

The ability of a long-lived seller to maintain and profit from a good reputation may induce her to provide high quality or effort despite short-run incentives to the contrary. This incentive remains in place with private monitoring, provided that buyers share their information. However, this assumption is unrealistic in environments where information sharing is costly or the beneficiaries of a buyer’s sharing are strangers. I study a simple mechanism that induces costly information provision, and may explain such behavior in environments where the incentives are not overt. Agents who possess information may share it with the community and acquire a reputation for gossiping. Reputations function in tandem: sellers provide high effort because they face agents with reputations for information sharing, and expect the outcome of their dealings will be made public, while information holders share their information as a reputation for doing so results in higher effort from sellers.

[1]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Sanctioning Reputation Mechanisms in Online Trading Environments with Moral Hazard , 2004 .

[2]  V. Smith,et al.  Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Reply , 1999 .

[3]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Trust among strangers in internet transactions: Empirical analysis of eBay' s reputation system , 2002, The Economics of the Internet and E-commerce.

[4]  C. Shapiro Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputations , 1983 .

[5]  P. Resnick,et al.  The Market for Evaluations , 1999 .

[6]  Andrew Postlewaite,et al.  Social Norms and Random Matching Games , 1995 .

[7]  Elchanan Ben-Porath,et al.  Communication in repeated games with costly monitoring , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[8]  Thomas R. Palfrey,et al.  Altruism, Reputation, and Noise in Linear Public Goods Experiments , 1996 .

[9]  R. Kihlstrom,et al.  Advertising as a Signal , 1984, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  The role of institutions in the revival of trade: the law merchant , 1990 .

[11]  David M. Kreps,et al.  Reputation and imperfect information , 1982 .

[12]  Daniel B. KLElN Promise Keeping in the Great Society: A Model of Credit Information Sharing , 1992 .

[13]  Catherine C. Eckel,et al.  Altruism in Anonymous Dictator Games , 1996 .

[14]  Kyle Bagwell The economics of advertising , 2001 .

[15]  D. Fudenberg,et al.  Efficiency and Observability with Long-Run and Short-Run Players , 1994 .

[16]  Drew Fudenberg,et al.  The Folk Theorem in Repeated Games with Discounting or with Incomplete Information , 1986 .

[17]  John H. Miller,et al.  NOTES AND COMMENTS GIVING ACCORDING TO GARP: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE CONSISTENCY OF PREFERENCES FOR ALTRUISM , 2002 .

[18]  Gary E. Bolton How Effective are Electronic Reputation Mechanisms , 2003 .

[19]  V. Smith,et al.  Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games , 2000 .

[20]  Michihiro Kandori Social Norms and Community Enforcement , 1992 .

[21]  B. Klein,et al.  The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance , 1981, Journal of Political Economy.