Results of Detailed Hydrologic Characterization Tests - Fiscal Year 2000
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Dietmar Klotz,et al. Point dilution methods of investigating ground water flow by means of radioisotopes , 1968 .
[2] James J. Butler,et al. The use of slug tests to describe vertical variations in hydraulic conductivity , 1994 .
[3] Mary J. Hartman,et al. Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring for Fiscal Year 1999 , 2000 .
[4] T. Narasimhan,et al. An Evaluation of the Bouwer and Rice Method of Slug Test Analysis , 1995 .
[5] O. Lehn Franke,et al. Bias in Groundwater Samples Caused by Wellbore Flow , 1989 .
[6] C. E. Jacob,et al. A generalized graphical method for evaluating formation constants and summarizing well‐field history , 1946 .
[7] F. Spane. Applicability of Slug Interference Tests for Hydraulic Characterization of Unconfined Aquifers: (1) Analytical Assessment , 1996 .
[8] K. Karasaki,et al. Analytical models of slug tests , 1988 .
[9] Todd C. Rasmussen,et al. Identifying and Removing Barometric Pressure Effects in Confined and Unconfined Aquifers , 1997 .
[10] Paul D. Thorne,et al. Results of Detailed Hydrologic Characterization Tests - Fiscal Year 1999 , 2001 .
[11] A. Michalski,et al. Characterization of Transmissive Fractures by Simple Tracing of In-Well Flow , 1990 .
[12] F. Spane,et al. Hydrochemistry and hydrogeologic conditions within the Hanford Site upper basalt confined aquifer system , 1995 .
[13] Darrell I. Leap,et al. A single‐well tracing method for estimating regional advective velocity in a confined aquifer: Theory and preliminary laboratory verification , 1988 .
[14] Ram G. Agarwal,et al. A New Method To Account For Producing Time Effects When Drawdown Type Curves Are Used To Analyze Pressure Buildup And Other Test Data , 1980 .
[15] F. J. Frank,et al. Geology and ground-water characteristics of the Hanford Reservation of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Washington , 1972 .
[16] Edwin P. Weeks,et al. Barometric fluctuations in wells tapping deep unconfined aquifers , 1979 .
[17] S. P. Neuman. Analysis of Pumping Test Data From Anisotropic Unconfined Aquifers Considering Delayed Gravity Response , 1975 .
[18] Allen F. Moench,et al. Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water table aquifer , 1997 .
[19] James J. Butler,et al. The Role of Pumping Tests in Site Characterization: Some Theoretical Considerations , 1990 .
[20] K. R. Fecht,et al. Assessment of aquifer intercommunication in the B Pond-Gable Mountain Pond area of the Hanford Site , 1984 .
[21] James J. Butler,et al. Slug Tests in Unconfined Formations: An Assessment of the Bouwer and Rice Technique , 1995 .
[22] James J. Butler,et al. Improving the quality of parameter estimates obtained from slug tests , 1996 .
[23] Jr. Fa Spane. Effects of Barometric Fluctuations on Well Water-Level Measurements and Aquifer Test Data , 1999 .
[24] Istvan Bogardi,et al. FLOW DIRECTIONS WITH A SPREADSHEET , 1989 .
[25] S. P. Neuman. Theory of flow in unconfined aquifers considering delayed response of the water table , 1972 .
[26] F. A. Jr. Spane,et al. Selected hydraulic test analysis techniques for constant-rate discharge tests , 1993 .
[27] J. Pickens,et al. Scale‐dependent dispersion in a stratified granular aquifer , 1981 .
[28] A. Zuber,et al. BOREHOLE DILUTION TECHNIQUES: A CRITICAL REVIEW. , 1968 .
[29] George F. Pinder,et al. Calculation of Velocity in Three Space Dimensions from Hydraulic Head Measurements , 1982 .
[30] C. V. Theis. The relation between the lowering of the Piezometric surface and the rate and duration of discharge of a well using ground‐water storage , 1935 .
[31] D. R. Newcomer,et al. Calculation of groundwater discharge to the Columbia River in the 100-N Area , 1992 .
[32] F. Molz,et al. Design and Performance of Single‐Well Tracer Tests at the Mobile Site , 1985 .
[33] D. Guyonnet,et al. Evaluating the Volume of Porous Medium Investigated During Slug Tests , 1993 .
[34] S. Hall. Single Well Tracer Tests in Aquifer Characterization , 1993 .
[35] H. Bouwer,et al. A slug test for determining hydraulic conductivity of unconfined aquifers with completely or partially penetrating wells , 1976 .
[36] Jr . James J. Butler,et al. Slug tests in site characterization; some practical considerations , 1996 .
[37] M. S. Hantush. Hydraulics of Wells , 1964 .
[38] R. J. Zinkl,et al. Supplement to procedures, analysis, and comparison of groundwater velocity measurement methods for unconfined aquifers , 1988 .
[39] D. Bourdet,et al. Supplement to SPE 12777, Use of Pressure Derivative in Well-Test Interpretation , 1989 .
[40] Paul D. Thorne,et al. Analysis of the Hydrologic Response Associated With a Shutdown and Restart of the 200-ZP-1 Pump and Treat System , 2000 .
[41] W. E. Cronin,et al. A Method for Estimating Effective Porosity and Ground‐Water Velocity , 1991 .
[42] F. A. Spane,et al. Applicability of Slug Interference Tests for Hydraulic Characterization of Unconfined Aquifers: (2) Field Test Examples , 1996 .
[43] Williams,et al. Development of a three-dimensional ground-water model of the Hanford Site unconfined aquifer system: FY 1995 status report , 1995 .
[44] Bruce N. Bjornstad,et al. Revised Hydrogeology for the Suprabasalt Aquifer System, 200-East Area and Vicinity, Hanford Site, Washington , 2000 .
[45] H. Bouwer. The Bouwer and Rice Slug Test — An Updatea , 1989 .
[46] K. Novakowski. Analysis of pulse interference tests , 1989 .