Synergy between pollution and carbon emissions control: Comparing China and the United States

We estimate the potential synergy between pollution and climate control in the U.S. and China, summarizing the results as emissions cross-elasticities of control. In both countries, ancillary carbon reductions resulting from SO2 and NOx control tend to rise with the increased stringency of control targets, reflecting the eventual need for wholesale change toward non-fossil technologies when large reductions are required. Under stringent pollution targets, the non-target effects tend to be higher in China than in the U.S., due to China's heavy reliance on coal. This result suggests that China may have greater incentives to reduce SO2 and NOx with locally apparent pollution benefits, but related efforts would at the same time reduce CO2 emissions significantly. We also find strong non-target effects of CO2 abatement in both countries, but the cross effects in this direction depend less on the stringency of control and are stronger in the U.S. than in China.

[1]  Scott E. Atkinson,et al.  Non-separable pollution control: Implications for a CO2 emissions cap and trade system , 2014 .

[2]  Jiming Hao,et al.  Air quality management in China: issues, challenges, and options. , 2012, Journal of environmental sciences.

[3]  Caleb J. Waugh,et al.  An integrated assessment of air pollutant abatement opportunities in a computable general equilibrium framework , 2012 .

[4]  P. Bosch,et al.  Climate change 2007 - mitigation of climate change , 2007 .

[5]  Markus Amann,et al.  Co-benefits of post-2012 global climate mitigation policies , 2013, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[6]  Richard D. Morgenstern,et al.  The Ancillary Carbon Benefits of SO2 Reductions from a Small-Boiler Policy in Taiyuan, PRC , 2004 .

[7]  Banco Mundial Cost of pollution in China: economic estimates of physical damages , 2007 .

[8]  Eliza Harris,et al.  Development of a spectroscopic technique for continuous online monitoring of oxygen and site-specific nitrogen isotopic composition of atmospheric nitrous oxide. , 2014, Analytical chemistry.

[9]  Daniel Bodansky,et al.  The Copenhagen Climate Change Conference: A Postmortem , 2010, American Journal of International Law.

[10]  Valerie J. Karplus,et al.  Climate Co-benefits of Tighter SO 2 and NO x Regulations in China , 2012 .

[11]  Valerie J. Karplus,et al.  Carbon co-benefits of tighter SO2 and NOx regulations in China , 2013 .

[12]  Robert McDougall,et al.  Global trade, assistance, and production : The GTAP 5 Data Base , 2002 .

[13]  Yeora Chae,et al.  Co-benefit analysis of an air quality management plan and greenhouse gas reduction strategies in the Seoul metropolitan area. , 2010 .

[14]  R. Weiss,et al.  Estimating regional methane surface fluxes: the relative importance of surface and GOSAT mole fraction measurements , 2012 .

[15]  Dieter Kranzlmüller,et al.  Proceedings of the First international conference on Information and communication on technology for the fight against global warming , 2011 .

[16]  Yan Xu,et al.  Local air pollutant emission reduction and ancillary carbon benefits of SO2 control policies: Application of AIM/CGE model to China , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  The future of U.S. natural gas production, use, and trade , 2011 .

[18]  Valerie J. Karplus,et al.  Markets versus Regulation: The Efficiency and Distributional Impacts of U.S. Climate Policy Proposals , 2014 .

[19]  Kira J M Matus,et al.  Toward integrated assessment of environmental change: air pollution health effects in the USA , 2008 .

[20]  Mark D. Agee,et al.  Non-Separable Pollution Control: Implications for a CO2 Emissions Cap and Trade System , 2012 .

[21]  Thomas Damassa,et al.  GHG MITIGATION IN THE UNITED STATES: AN OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT POLICY LANDSCAPE , 2012 .

[22]  Dennis L. Meadows,et al.  Limits to growth : the 30-year update , 2004 .

[23]  Alison C. Smith The Climate Bonus: Co-benefits of Climate Policy , 2013 .

[24]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) Model: Version 4 , 2005 .

[25]  The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act : 1990 to 2020 , 2010 .

[26]  Johannes Bollen,et al.  Local air pollution and global climate change. A combined cost-benefit analysis. , 2009 .

[27]  Fabian Wagner,et al.  GAINS - An Interactive Tool for Assessing International GHG Mitigation Regimes , 2011, ICT-GLOW.

[28]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Health damages from air pollution in China. , 2012 .

[29]  J. Corfee-Morlot,et al.  Co-Benefits of Climate Change Mitigation Policies: Literature Review and New Results , 2009 .

[30]  Xuehong Wang Clearing the Air: The Health and Economic Damages of Air Pollution in China , 2008 .

[31]  Dale W. Jorgenson,et al.  An Integrated Assessment of the Economic Costs and Environmental Benefits of Pollution and Carbon Control , 2012 .

[32]  P. James The future of coal , 1982 .

[33]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Climate policies can help resolve energy security and air pollution challenges , 2013, Climatic Change.

[34]  G. Nemet,et al.  Implications of incorporating air-quality co-benefits into climate change policymaking , 2010 .