A fog architecture for decentralized decision making in smart buildings

The integration of humans into smart buildings raises challenges between meeting individual preferences and the generic rules set to optimize energy effectiveness of interest to organizations. Merging the individual preferences of multiple occupants that share thermal zones compounds the challenge. To address related challenges, we have developed FRODO (Fog Architecture for Decision Support in Organizations), an architecture designed to establish a location- aware environment for conflict negotiation and decision support that is based on fog computing. This paper describes the model transformation from a centralized software architecture towards a decentralized Cyber-Physical System (CPS) which encompasses sensors, actuators, and the occupants of smart buildings. The transformation is implemented through MIBO, a framework that allows occupants to control their environment. MIBO has been extended to introduce a fog layer for improved negotiation and conflict resolution. This enables additional benefits to be optimized, such as increased quality of service, reduced latency, and improved security and resilience. The fog layer, introduced with FRODO, allows occupants and organizations to express and discuss conflicts in decision-making, at their point of origin.

[1]  Marimuthu Palaniswami,et al.  EHOPES: Data-centered Fog platform for smart living , 2015, 2015 International Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ITNAC).

[2]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  The Case for VM-Based Cloudlets in Mobile Computing , 2009, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[3]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  The Fog computing paradigm: Scenarios and security issues , 2014, 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems.

[4]  Volker Hartkopf,et al.  An integrated approach to design and engineering of intelligent buildings—The Intelligent Workplace at Carnegie Mellon University , 1997 .

[5]  Insup Lee,et al.  Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution , 2010, Design Automation Conference.

[6]  Vivian Loftness,et al.  The intuitive control of smart home and office environments , 2011, Onward! 2011.

[7]  B. F. Castro Buschmann, Frank; Meunier, Regine; Rohnert, Hans; Sommerlad, Peter; Stal, Michael. Pattern-oriented software architecture: a system of patterns, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1996 , 1997 .

[8]  M. Hammer,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation , 1993 .

[9]  Sebastian Peters,et al.  MIBO - A Framework for the Integration of Multimodal Intuitive Controls in Smart Buildings , 2016 .

[10]  Jan Ole Johanssen,et al.  An IDE for multimodal controls in smart buildings , 2016, ICMI.

[11]  Ivan Stojmenovic,et al.  Fog computing: A cloud to the ground support for smart things and machine-to-machine networks , 2014, 2014 Australasian Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (ATNAC).

[12]  Teruo Higashino,et al.  Edge-centric Computing: Vision and Challenges , 2015, CCRV.

[13]  Edward A. Lee Cyber Physical Systems: Design Challenges , 2008, 2008 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC).

[14]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Fog Computing: Helping the Internet of Things Realize Its Potential , 2016, Computer.

[15]  Sateesh Addepalli,et al.  Fog computing and its role in the internet of things , 2012, MCC '12.

[16]  Mohammad Abdullah Al Faruque,et al.  Energy Management-as-a-Service Over Fog Computing Platform , 2015, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[17]  Ralph Johnson,et al.  design patterns elements of reusable object oriented software , 2019 .