Diffusion of an evidence-based smoking cessation intervention through Facebook: a randomised controlled trial study protocol

Introduction Online social networks represent a potential mechanism for the dissemination of health interventions including smoking cessation; however, which elements of an intervention determine diffusion between participants is unclear. Diffusion is frequently measured using R, the reproductive rate, which is determined by the duration of use (t), the ‘contagiousness’ of an intervention (β) and a participant's total contacts (z). We have developed a Facebook ‘app’ that allows us to enable or disable various components designed to impact the duration of use (expanded content, proactive contact), contagiousness (active and passive sharing) and number of contacts (use by non-smoker supporters). We hypothesised that these elements would be synergistic in their impact on R, while including non-smokers would induce a ‘carrier’ state allowing the app to bridge clusters of smokers. Methods and analysis This study is a fractional factorial, randomised control trial of the diffusion of a Facebook application for smoking cessation. Participants recruited through online advertising are randomised to 1 of 12 cells and serve as ‘seed’ users. All user interactions are tracked, including social interactions with friends. Individuals installing the application that can be traced back to a seed participant are deemed ‘descendants’ and form the outcome of interest. Analysis will be conducted using Poisson regression, with event count as the outcome and the number of seeds in the cell as the exposure. Results The results will be reported as a baseline R0 for the reference group, and incidence rate ratio for the remainder of predictors. Ethics and Dissemination This study uses an abbreviated consent process designed to minimise barriers to adoption and was deemed to be minimal risk by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Results will be disseminated through traditional academic literature as well as social media. If feasible, anonymised data and underlying source code are intended to be made available under an open source license. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT01746472.

[1]  Kenneth F Schulz,et al.  Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice , 2002, The Lancet.

[2]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Use of smoking-cessation treatments in the United States. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  Nathan K. Cobb,et al.  Characterizing Internet Searchers of Smoking Cessation Information , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  J. Noell,et al.  A randomised control study of a fully automated internet based smoking cessation programme , 2006, Tobacco Control.

[5]  D B Abrams,et al.  Integrating individual and public health perspectives for treatment of tobacco dependence under managed health care: A combined stepped-care and matching model , 1996, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[6]  Andy McEwen,et al.  Online support for smoking cessation: a systematic review of the literature. , 2009, Addiction.

[7]  M. Munafo,et al.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. , 2012, Health technology assessment.

[8]  M. Goolsby,et al.  Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence , 2008, Pediatrics.

[9]  D. Mant,et al.  Systematic review and validation of prediction rules for identifying children with serious infections in emergency departments and urgent-access primary care. , 2012, Health technology assessment.

[10]  Nathan K. Cobb,et al.  Health behavior interventions in the age of facebook. , 2012, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  John E. Perez,et al.  Toward evidence-based Internet interventions: A Spanish/English Web site for international smoking cessation trials. , 2006, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[12]  G. Eysenbach.  The Law of Attrition , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[13]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market , 2006, Science.

[14]  Seung-Kwon Myung,et al.  Effects of Web- and computer-based smoking cessation programs: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[15]  S. Murphy,et al.  The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and the sequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART): new methods for more potent eHealth interventions. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[16]  A. Jemal,et al.  Under-use of smoking-cessation treatments: results from the National Health Interview Survey, 2000. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[17]  A E Ades,et al.  An evaluation of the feasibility, cost and value of information of a multicentre randomised controlled trial of intravenous immunoglobulin for sepsis (severe sepsis and septic shock): incorporating a systematic review, meta-analysis and value of information analysis. , 2012, Health technology assessment.

[18]  Nathan K. Cobb,et al.  Initial evaluation of a real-world Internet smoking cessation system. , 2005, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[19]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  Web-based smoking-cessation programs: results of a randomized trial. , 2008, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  Kirthi Kalyanam,et al.  Adaptive experimentation in interactive marketing: The case of viral marketing at Plaxo , 2007 .

[21]  Matthew J. Salganik,et al.  How Many People Do You Know?: Efficiently Estimating Personal Network Size , 2010, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[22]  N. Christakis,et al.  SUPPLEMENTARY ONLINE MATERIAL FOR: The Collective Dynamics of Smoking in a Large Social Network , 2022 .

[23]  L. Wahl,et al.  Perspectives on the basic reproductive ratio , 2005, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[24]  C. Orleans,et al.  Increasing the demand for and use of effective smoking-cessation treatments reaping the full health benefits of tobacco-control science and policy gains--in our lifetime. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[25]  Aziz Sheikh,et al.  Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[26]  Ting-Yuan Liu,et al.  Relationships between social norms, social network characteristics, and HIV risk behaviors in Thailand and the United States. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[27]  Paul Ohm.  Broken Promises of Privacy: Responding to the Surprising Failure of Anonymization , 2009 .

[28]  Nathan K. Cobb,et al.  Social network structure of a large online community for smoking cessation. , 2010, American journal of public health.

[29]  David B Abrams,et al.  A randomized trial of Internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[30]  Cohen-Cole,et al.  Estimating peer effects on health in social networks : A response to , 2008 .

[31]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[32]  David B Abrams,et al.  Internet- vs. telephone-administered questionnaires in a randomized trial of smoking cessation. , 2006, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[33]  J. Prochaska,et al.  In Search of How People Change: Applications to Addictive Behaviors , 1992, The American psychologist.

[34]  Amanda L. Graham,et al.  A Review of Web-Assisted Tobacco Interventions (WATIs) , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[35]  Beth Bock,et al.  Smoking cessation treatment on the Internet: content, quality, and usability. , 2004, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.

[36]  Brian A. King,et al.  Current cigarette smoking among adults - United States, 2005-2014. , 2015, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[37]  Megan E. Piper,et al.  Time to first cigarette in the morning as an index of ability to quit smoking: implications for nicotine dependence. , 2007, Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco.