Using multiple measures, this two-part investigation examined what text characteristics readers considered interesting and uninteresting, the relationships among these text characteristics, and how interest affected recall in two different expository texts on a high-interest topic—dinosaurs. Based on think-alouds and postreading verbal reports of college students in the first experiment, five text characteristics were most associated with interest: (a) information that was important, new, and valued; (b) information that was unexpected; (c) connections readers made between the text and their prior knowledge or experience; (d) imagery and descriptive language; and (e) authors' connections (e.g., comparisons and analogies). Characteristics that made the texts uninteresting involved problems related to comprehension—specifically, lack of adequate explanation and background information, difficult vocabulary, and lack of coherence. In addition, lack of credibility interfered with the value of the new information and theories presented in the texts. In the second experiment, rating results indicated that interest and importance were highly correlated. In recall, a statistically significant interaction was found between interest and importance, with information rated as both interesting and important recalled best. Results are discussed in terms of the theoretical and empirical literature on interest, with implications for curriculum development and research.
En esta investigacion, que comprende dos experimentos, se usaron varias medidas para examinar las caracteristicas de textos que resultaron interesantes y poco interesantes a los lectores, las relaciones entre estas caracteristicas textuales y la forma en que el interes afecto el recuerdo de dos textos expositivos diferentes acerca de un tema de gran interes: los dinosaurios. En el primer experimento, basado en protocolos de pensamiento en voz alta y relatos posteriores a la lectura hechos por estudiantes universitarios, se encontraron cinco caracteristicas textuales muy asociadas al interes: (a) informacion importante, nueva y valorada, (b) informacion inesperada, (c) conexiones entre el texto y el conocimiento previo o experiencia de los lectores, (d) lenguaje imaginativo/descriptivo y (e) conexiones hechas por los autores (e.g., comparaciones y analogias). Las caracteristicas de los textos poco interesantes consistieron en problemas relacionados con la comprension, especificamente la falta de explicacion adecuada e informacion previa, un vocabulario dificil y la falta de coherencia. Ademas, la falta de credibilidad interfirio con el valor de la informacion nueva y las teorias presentadas en los textos. En el segundo experimento, se observo una correlacion alta entre el interes y la importancia. En los relatos, se hallo una interaccion estadisticamente significativa entre interes e importancia, la informacion evaluada como interesante e importante fue mejor recordada. Se discuten los resultados en terminos de la literatura teorica y empirica sobre el interes, con implicancias para el diseno curricular y la investigacion.
Durch das Anwenden verschiedener Masstabe erforschte diese zweiteilige Untersuchung die Textcharakteristiken welche die Leser als interessant und uninteressant empfinden, die Zusammenhange zwischen diesen Textcharakteristiken, und wie sich dieses Interesse auf die Wiederholung von zwei ausgesuchten verschiedenen Texten uber ein hochinteressantes Thema—Dinosaurier—auswirkt. Basierend auf lautes Denken und Nachlesen der mundlichen Berichte von Hochschulstudenten beim ersten Experiment wurden funf Textcharakteristiken hauptsachlich mit folgenden Interessen assoziiert: (a) als wichtig hingenommene, neue, und wertvolle Informationen; (b) Information welche nicht erwartet wurde; (c) Verbindungen, welche die Leser zwischen dem Text und ihren Vorkenntnissen oder Erfahrungen machten; (d) imaginare/darstellerische Sprache; und (e) Verbindungen zu Autoren (z.B. Vergleiche und Analogien). Charakteristiken, die den Text uninteressant er scheinen liesen, bestanden aus Problemen in Bezug auf Verstehen und Erfassen, speziell der Mangel an ausreichender Erklarung und Hintergrundinformationen, schwieriges Vokabular und mangelnder Klarheit [Koharenz]. Erganzend beeintrachtigte ein Mangel an Glaubwurdigkeit den Wert der in den Texten unterbreiteten neuen Informationen und Theorien. In dem zweiten Experiment wiesen die Bewertungsergebnisse daraufhin, das Interesse und Wichtigkeit in einem hochgradigen Zusammenhang standen. In Ruckschau wurde statistisch ein bedeutenderes Zusammenspiel zwischen Interesse und Wichtignahme bzw. Wesentlichkeit festgestellt, mit am besten erinnerten Informationen, die sowohl als beides—interessant und wesentlich—eingestuft wurden. Ergebnisse werden im Rahmen der theoretischen und empirischen Literatur je nach Interesse diskutiert, mit Implikationen fur Lehrplanentwicklung und Forschung.
En utilisant de multiples mesures, cette investigation en deux parties a examine quelles caracteristiques du texte les lecteurs jugent interessantes et ininteressantes, les relations entre ces caracteristiques textuelles, et comment l'interet affecte le rappel dans deux textes informatifs differents portant sur un theme d'un grand interet, les dinosaures. En se basant sur des verbalisations de la pensee et des rapports verbaux post-experimentaux d'etudiants de premier cycle dans la premiere experience, on a trouve cinq caracteristiques textuelles tres associees a l'interet: a) une information importante, nouvelle, et valorisee; b) une information inattendue; c) des mises en rapport faites par le lecteur entre le texte et ses connaissances ou experiences anterieures; d) un langage image/descriptif; et e) des mises en rapport faites par les auteurs (par exemple, des compara isons et des analogies). Les caracteristiques qui rendent les textes ininteressants incluent des problemes lies a la comprehension, specifiquement, un defaut d'explication adequate et d'information de base, un vocabulaire difficile, et un manque de coherence. De plus, le manque de credibilite interfere avec la valeur de l'information nouvelle et les theories presentees dans les textes. Dans la seconde experience, les echelles d'evaluation indiquent que l'interet et l'importance sont fortement correles. Dans le rappel, on a trouve une interaction statistiquement significative entre l'interet et l'importance, l'information jugee a la fois interessante et importante etant mieux rappelee. On discute les resultats en fonction de la litterature theorique et empirique relative a l'interet, et des implications pour l'evolution des programmes scolaires et de la recherche.
[1]
P. Alexander,et al.
The Role of Subject-Matter Knowledge and Interest in the Processing of Linear and Nonlinear Texts
,
1994
.
[2]
S. Tobias.
Interest, Prior Knowledge, and Learning
,
1994
.
[3]
B. Meyer.
Use of Top-Level Structure in Text: Key for Reading Comprehension of Ninth-Grade Students.
,
1980
.
[4]
M. Mitchell.
Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom.
,
1993
.
[5]
Peter N. Winograd.
Strategic difficulties in summarizing texts
,
1984
.
[6]
Mark Sadoski,et al.
Reader Response and Long-Term Recall for Journalistic Text: The Roles of Imagery, Affect, and Importance.
,
1990
.
[7]
Mark Sadoski,et al.
Impact of concreteness on comprehensibility, interest, and memory for text: Implications for dual coding theory and text design.
,
1993
.
[8]
Joseph P. Magliano,et al.
Conscious understanding during comprehension
,
1996
.
[9]
Roger C. Schank,et al.
Interestingness: Controlling Inferences
,
1979,
Artif. Intell..
[10]
Margaret G. McKeown,et al.
Revising Social Studies Text from a Text-Processing Perspective: Evidence of Improved Comprehensibility.
,
1991
.
[11]
Patricia A. Alexander,et al.
Interrelationship of Knowledge, Interest, and Recall: Assessing a Model of Domain Learning
,
1995
.
[12]
Bruce K. Britton,et al.
Instructional texts rewritten by five expert teams: Revisions and retention improvements.
,
1989
.
[13]
Gregory Schraw,et al.
Seduction of the strategic reader: effects of interest on strategies and recall
,
1993
.
[14]
Suzanne E. Wade,et al.
Effects of Importance and Interest on Recall of Biographical Text
,
1990
.
[15]
Gregory Schraw.
Processing and Recall Differences among Seductive Details.
,
1998
.
[16]
Patricia A. Alexander,et al.
How Subject-Matter Knowledge Affects Recall and Interest
,
1994
.
[17]
Suzanne Hidi,et al.
Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students' recall of expository texts.
,
1988
.
[18]
Commentary: Improving Instructional Text: Some Lessons Learned
,
1991
.
[19]
Connie A. Bridge,et al.
The Effects of Reader and Text Characteristics on Imagery Reported During and After Reading
,
1989
.
[20]
R. Mayer,et al.
The Role of Interest in Learning From Scientific Text and Illustrations: On the Distinction Between Emotional Interest and Cognitive Interest
,
1997
.
[21]
Suzanne Hidi,et al.
Interest and Its Contribution as a Mental Resource for Learning
,
1990
.
[22]
Thomas M. Duffy,et al.
Models for the Design of Instructional Text.
,
1989
.
[23]
Margaret G. McKeown,et al.
Giving a text voice can improve students' understanding
,
1995
.
[24]
Patricia A. Alexander,et al.
The role of importance and interest in the processing of text
,
1996
.
[25]
Ruth Garner,et al.
Topic knowledge, cognitive interest, and text recall: A microanalysis.
,
1991
.
[26]
Edward B. Fry,et al.
Fry's Readability Graph: Clarifications, Validity, and Extension to Level 17.
,
1977
.
[27]
Ralph E. Reynolds,et al.
Effect of Interest on Attention and Learning
,
1988
.
[28]
Paul Whitney,et al.
Think-Aloud Protocols and the Study of Comprehension
,
1996
.
[29]
Suzanne Hidi,et al.
That's Important But is it Interesting? Two Factors in Text Processing
,
1982
.
[30]
E. Goetz,et al.
That's News to Me: Readers' Responses to Brief Newspaper Articles
,
1994
.
[31]
Gregory Schraw,et al.
Sources of Situational Interest
,
1995
.
[32]
William F. Brewer,et al.
The Role of Anomalous Data in Knowledge Acquisition: A Theoretical Framework and Implications for Science Instruction
,
1993
.
[33]
Mark Sadoski,et al.
Concreteness effects in text recall: dual coding or context availability?
,
1995
.
[34]
Ulrich Schiefele,et al.
Interest, Learning, and Motivation
,
1991
.
[35]
Patricia A. Alexander,et al.
Interest and Learning From Text
,
1991
.
[36]
Suzanne E. Wade,et al.
Effect of Self-Selected Study Methods on Learning.
,
1989
.
[37]
C. S. White,et al.
Effects of 'Seductive Details' on Macroprocessing and Microprocessing in Adults and Children
,
1989
.
[38]
Margery R. Bernstein.
Relationship between Interest and Reading Comprehension
,
1955
.
[39]
W. Kintsch.
Learning from text, levels of comprehension, or: Why anyone would read a story anyway
,
1980
.