High-performance brain-machine interface enabled by an adaptive optimal feedback-controlled point process decoder

Brain-machine interface (BMI) performance has been improved using Kalman filters (KF) combined with closed-loop decoder adaptation (CLDA). CLDA fits the decoder parameters during closed-loop BMI operation based on the neural activity and inferred user velocity intention. These advances have resulted in the recent ReFIT-KF and SmoothBatch-KF decoders. Here we demonstrate high-performance and robust BMI control using a novel closed-loop BMI architecture termed adaptive optimal feedback-controlled (OFC) point process filter (PPF). Adaptive OFC-PPF allows subjects to issue neural commands and receive feedback with every spike event and hence at a faster rate than the KF. Moreover, it adapts the decoder parameters with every spike event in contrast to current CLDA techniques that do so on the time-scale of minutes. Finally, unlike current methods that rotate the decoded velocity vector, adaptive OFC-PPF constructs an infinite-horizon OFC model of the brain to infer velocity intention during adaptation. Preliminary data collected in a monkey suggests that adaptive OFC-PPF improves BMI control. OFC-PPF outperformed SmoothBatch-KF in a self-paced center-out movement task with 8 targets. This improvement was due to both the PPF's increased rate of control and feedback compared with the KF, and to the OFC model suggesting that the OFC better approximates the user's strategy. Also, the spike-by-spike adaptation resulted in faster performance convergence compared to current techniques. Thus adaptive OFC-PPF enabled proficient BMI control in this monkey.

[1]  Byron M. Yu,et al.  Internal models engaged by brain-computer interface control , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[2]  Justin C. Sanchez,et al.  A Symbiotic Brain-Machine Interface through Value-Based Decision Making , 2011, PloS one.

[3]  Andrew S. Whitford,et al.  Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding , 2008, Nature.

[4]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Dynamic Analysis of Neural Encoding by Point Process Adaptive Filtering , 2004, Neural Computation.

[5]  E. Todorov,et al.  Infinite Horizon Optimal Control Framework for Goal Directed Movements , 2010 .

[6]  A B Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical representation of speed and direction during reaching. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  John P. Cunningham,et al.  A High-Performance Neural Prosthesis Enabled by Control Algorithm Design , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  J. Krakauer,et al.  A computational neuroanatomy for motor control , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  G. W. Wornell,et al.  Feedback-Controlled Parallel Point Process Filter for Estimation of Goal-Directed Movements From Neural Signals , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[10]  Nicolas Y. Masse,et al.  Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm , 2012, Nature.

[11]  David M. Santucci,et al.  Learning to Control a Brain–Machine Interface for Reaching and Grasping by Primates , 2003, PLoS biology.

[12]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  A parallel point-process filter for estimation of goal-directed movements from neural signals , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[13]  E N Brown,et al.  A Statistical Paradigm for Neural Spike Train Decoding Applied to Position Prediction from Ensemble Firing Patterns of Rat Hippocampal Place Cells , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  A. Schwartz,et al.  High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia , 2013, The Lancet.

[15]  Ziv M. Williams,et al.  A Real-Time Brain-Machine Interface Combining Motor Target and Trajectory Intent Using an Optimal Feedback Control Design , 2013, PloS one.

[16]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, Two Volume Set , 1995 .

[17]  J. M. Carmena,et al.  Closed-Loop Decoder Adaptation on Intermediate Time-Scales Facilitates Rapid BMI Performance Improvements Independent of Decoder Initialization Conditions , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[18]  Emery N. Brown,et al.  Neural population partitioning and a concurrent brain-machine interface for sequential motor function , 2012, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  Dawn M. Taylor,et al.  Direct Cortical Control of 3D Neuroprosthetic Devices , 2002, Science.

[20]  J. Carmena,et al.  Emergence of a Stable Cortical Map for Neuroprosthetic Control , 2009, PLoS biology.