Evaluation of two finite element formulations for a rapid 3D stress analysis of sandwich structures

Abstract For efficiently simulating the impact behavior of sandwich structures made from composite face sheets and a lightweight core a rapid and accurate 3D stress analysis is essential. For that reason, a three-layered finite element formulation based on plane stress assumptions was recently developed by Karger et al. [Karger, WA, Rolfes R, Rohwer K. A three-layered sandwich element with improved transverse shear stiffness and stress based on FSDT. Comput Struct, submitted for publication]. It has turned out, however, that under concentrated out-of-plane loads this element formulation lacks appropriate accuracy of stress results. Therefore, an improved finite element formulation is developed, which accounts for the full 3D stress state. In a post-processing routine, the transverse stresses are improved by using the Extended 2D Method, which was developed by Rolfes and Rohwer [Rolfes R, Rohwer K. Improved transverse shear stresses in composite finite elements based on first order shear deformation theory. Int J Numer Meth Eng 1997;40:51–60] and extended to a three-layered sandwich structure by Karger et al. Both the finite element formulation by Karger et al. and the new formulation presented in the present article use pure displacement approaches and require only C0-continuity conditions, which simplifies integration into existing FE codes and allows combined application with other finite elements. Two examples demonstrate the accuracy and applicability of the two elements.

[1]  Marco Di Sciuva,et al.  Development of an anisotropic, multilayered, shear-deformable rectangular plate element , 1985 .

[2]  K. Rohwer Improved transverse shear stiffnesses for anisotropic sandwich plates and shells. , 1993 .

[3]  N. Pagano,et al.  Exact Solutions for Rectangular Bidirectional Composites and Sandwich Plates , 1970 .

[4]  Raimund Rolfes,et al.  A three-layered sandwich element with improved transverse shear stiffness and stresses based on FSDT , 2006 .

[5]  Raimund Rolfes,et al.  Advances, Current Developments and Future Trends in Thin-Walled Composite Aerospace Structural Systems , 2004 .

[6]  Raimund Rolfes,et al.  Stress analysis of laminated structures from fiber-reinforced composite materials , 2004 .

[7]  Anthony N. Palazotto,et al.  A higher-order sandwich plate theory accounting for 3-D stresses , 2000 .

[8]  J. Reddy Mechanics of laminated composite plates and shells : theory and analysis , 1996 .

[9]  C. Sun,et al.  Theories for the Dynamic Response of Laminated Plates , 1973 .

[10]  Hidenori Murakami,et al.  Laminated Composite Plate Theory With Improved In-Plane Responses , 1986 .

[11]  K. H. Lee,et al.  An improved zig-zag model for the bending of laminated composite shells , 1990 .

[12]  N. Pagano,et al.  Exact Solutions for Composite Laminates in Cylindrical Bending , 1969 .

[13]  Raimund Rolfes,et al.  High Performance Tools for Failure, Damage Tolerance and Stability Analysis of Composite Structures , 2002 .

[14]  Mark J. Schulz,et al.  Shear correction factors and an energy-consistent beam theory , 1999 .

[15]  Raimund Rolfes,et al.  Improved transverse shear stresses in composite finite elements based on first order shear deformation theory , 1997 .

[16]  Raimund Rolfes,et al.  Efficient linear transverse normal stress analysis of layered composite plates , 1998 .

[17]  E. Carrera On the use of the Murakami's zig-zag function in the modeling of layered plates and shells , 2004 .

[18]  Erdogan Madenci,et al.  Analysis of thick sandwich construction by a {3,2}-order theory , 2001 .

[19]  Ning Hu,et al.  The stress analysis of sandwich shells faced with composite sheets based on 3D FEM , 2003 .