Assessment of the in-plane deformability of RC floors with traditional and innovative lightening elements in RC framed and wall structures

In this paper, the in-plane deformability of floors in Reinforced Concrete (RC) structures has been investigated in order to establish the role of lightening elements made of both traditional ceiling bricks and Expanded Polystyrene (EPS) blocks. The study has been firstly developed via the implementation of three-dimensional finite element models simulating the real geometry of the floors. The numerical results have been, then, used to assess the thickness of equivalent slabs introduced in three-dimensional finite elements models of simple structures made of Reinforced Concrete frames or walls. These models have been used for verifying the effective in-plane floor deformability as a function of the vertical resistant elements typology (frames or walls), the building geometry (plane shape ratio, height, number of floor, dimensions of vertical elements), and the thickness of the equivalent slab. The numerical analyses have enabled to give interesting indications about the reliability of the hypothesis of rigid floors as the investigated parameters change.

[1]  Asimina Athanatopoulou,et al.  CODE PROVISIONS AND ANALYTICAL MODELLING FOR THE IN-PLANE FLEXIBILITY OF FLOOR DIAPHRAGMS IN BUILDING STRUCTURES , 2001 .

[2]  Nader Panahshahi,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF RC BUILDINGS WITH INELASTIC FLOOR DIAPHRAGMS , 1991 .

[3]  Sudhir K. Jain Seismic Response of Buildings with Flexible Floors , 1984 .

[4]  Paul C. Jennings,et al.  Analytical models for low-rise buildings with flexible floor diaphragms , 1985 .

[5]  Mario De Stefano,et al.  A review of research on seismic behaviour of irregular building structures since 2002 , 2008 .

[6]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Buildings with Rigid Walls and Flexible Roof Diaphragms. II: Evaluation of a New Seismic Design Approach Based on Distributed Diaphragm Yielding , 2016 .

[7]  Shen-Haw Ju,et al.  Comparison of Building Analyses Assuming Rigid or Flexible Floors , 2000 .

[8]  Nader Panahshahi,et al.  Effect of openings on in-plane structural behavior of reinforced concrete floor slabs , 2016 .

[9]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Distributed Yielding Concept for Improved Seismic Collapse Performance of Rigid Wall-Flexible Diaphragm Buildings , 2016 .

[10]  Sudhir K. Jain,et al.  Seismic Analysis of Asymmetric Buildings with Flexible Floor Diaphragms , 2004 .

[11]  Robert B. Fleischman,et al.  Seismic Performance of Perimeter Lateral-System Structures with Highly Flexible Diaphragms , 2002 .

[12]  Daniel P. Abrams,et al.  Seismic Behavior of Structures with Flexible Diaphragms , 1996 .

[13]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis: Draper/Applied Regression Analysis , 1998 .

[14]  Mary Beth D. Hueste,et al.  Diaphragm Effects in Rectangular Reinforced Concrete Buildings , 2004 .

[15]  Robert B. Fleischman,et al.  Dynamic behavior of perimeter lateral‐system structures with flexible diaphragms , 2001 .

[16]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis. , 1967 .

[17]  Ahmet E. Aktan,et al.  Problems in Predicting Seismic Responses of RC Buildings , 1988 .

[18]  Arturo Tena-Colunga,et al.  Assessment of the diaphragm condition for floor systems used in urban buildings , 2015 .

[19]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Buildings with Rigid Walls and Flexible Roof Diaphragms. I: Evaluation of Current U.S. Seismic Provisions , 2016 .

[20]  Hassan S. Saffarini,et al.  In-Plane Floor Deformations in RC Structures , 1992 .